Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 30;10(7):e034342. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034342.
Physical inactivity is a costly and leading health risk factor. Engaging in moderate or more intense regular physical activity reduces premature mortality at the population level. Walking is a viable option for achieving the recommended level of physical activity. Yet, the sedentary lifestyle is trending. Determinants of physical activity may be personal, social or environmental. Health promotion endeavours aiming to enhance population-level physical activity are reported in the literature. However, a full range of factors influencing the development and implementation of sustainable indoor walking programmes is unclear. The current review protocol is aimed at describing a process of realist synthesis to uncover contexts, mechanisms and outcomes of indoor walking intervention programmes, which might reveal facilitators, constraints and barriers of planning, implementing and participating in indoor walking initiatives open for the members of the general public.
We will employ a realist synthesis to determine successes or failures in certain circumstances for specific stakeholders, which will aid in developing a sustainable mall walking health promotion and community engagement programme. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed-method articles and reports will be screened for intervention theories and models in order to identify elements of programmes that may be linked to the success or failure of the interventions. Data related to the context, mechanism and outcome of the interventions will be collected, analysed and synthesised iteratively until a theoretical understanding develops, which might explain the intricacies of the success and failure of identified indoor walking programmes. The review process will be conducted and evaluated by using the recommended tools.
Ethical approval, such as Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board, was not required for this study because no direct interaction with patients will occur for data collection and analysis. We will disseminate directly to the scholarly community through publication and presentation and may post on social media or websites.
CRD42020150415.
身体活动不足是代价高昂且主要的健康风险因素。有规律地进行适度或更剧烈的身体活动可降低人群水平的过早死亡率。步行是达到推荐身体活动水平的可行选择。然而,久坐不动的生活方式正在流行。身体活动的决定因素可能是个人、社会或环境因素。旨在提高人群身体活动水平的健康促进工作在文献中有报道。然而,影响室内步行计划的制定和实施的各种因素尚不清楚。本研究方案旨在描述一个现实主义综合的过程,以揭示室内步行干预计划的背景、机制和结果,这可能揭示规划、实施和参与面向公众的室内步行计划的促进因素、限制因素和障碍。
我们将采用现实主义综合方法来确定特定利益相关者在特定情况下的成功或失败,这将有助于制定一个可持续的购物中心步行健康促进和社区参与计划。将筛选定性、定量和混合方法的文章和报告,以确定干预理论和模型,以确定可能与干预成功或失败相关的计划要素。将收集、分析和综合与干预相关的背景、机制和结果数据,直到形成一个理论理解,这可能解释所确定的室内步行计划成功和失败的复杂性。审查过程将使用推荐的工具进行和评估。
本研究不需要联合健康研究伦理委员会的伦理批准,因为在数据收集和分析过程中不会与患者直接互动。我们将直接向学术界传播,通过发表和演讲传播,并可能在社交媒体或网站上发布。
PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42020150415。