Suppr超能文献

巨细胞动脉炎的结局测量指标及 OMERACT 核心结局集考虑的评估工具的测量学特性:系统评价。

Outcomes Measured in Polymyalgia Rheumatica and Measurement Properties of Instruments Considered for the OMERACT Core Outcome Set: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

H. Twohig, MRCP, MRCGP, S. Muller, PhD, Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK;

C. Owen, MBBS (Hons), FRACP, Department of Rheumatology, Austin Health, and Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

J Rheumatol. 2021 Jun;48(6):883-893. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.200248. Epub 2020 Aug 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To systematically identify the outcome measures and instruments used in clinical studies of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and to evaluate evidence about their measurement properties.

METHODS

Searches based on the MeSH term "polymyalgia rheumatica" were carried out in 5 databases. Two researchers were involved in screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. Once outcomes and instruments used were identified and categorized, key instruments were selected for further review through a consensus process. Studies on measurement properties of these instruments were appraised against the COSMIN-OMERACT (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments-Outcome Measures in Rheumatology) checklist to determine the extent of evidence supporting their use in PMR.

RESULTS

Forty-six studies were included. In decreasing order of frequency, the most common outcomes (and instruments) used were markers of systemic inflammation [erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP)], pain [visual analog scale (VAS)], stiffness (duration in minutes), and physical function (elevation of upper limbs). Instruments selected for further evaluation were ESR, CRP, pain VAS, morning stiffness duration, and the Health Assessment Questionnaire. Five studies evaluated measurement properties of these instruments, but none met all of the COSMIN-OMERACT checklist criteria.

CONCLUSION

Measurement of outcomes in studies of PMR lacks consistency. The critical patient-centered domain of physical function is poorly assessed. None of the candidate instruments considered for inclusion in the core outcome set had high-quality evidence, derived from populations with PMR, on their full range of measurement properties. Further studies are needed to determine whether these instruments are suitable for inclusion in a core outcome measurement set for PMR.

摘要

目的

系统识别多发性肌痛症(PMR)临床研究中使用的结局测量指标和工具,并评估其测量特性的证据。

方法

使用 MeSH 术语“polymyalgia rheumatica”在 5 个数据库中进行检索。两名研究人员参与筛选、数据提取和偏倚风险评估。一旦确定并分类了结局和使用的工具,就通过共识过程选择关键工具进行进一步审查。使用 COSMIN-OMERACT(一致性标准选择健康测量工具-风湿病结局测量)清单评估这些工具的测量特性研究,以确定支持其在 PMR 中使用的证据程度。

结果

共纳入 46 项研究。按出现频率降序排列,最常见的结局(和工具)是全身炎症标志物[红细胞沉降率(ESR)、C 反应蛋白(CRP)]、疼痛[视觉模拟量表(VAS)]、僵硬(持续时间以分钟计)和身体功能(上肢抬高)。选择进行进一步评估的工具是 ESR、CRP、疼痛 VAS、晨僵持续时间和健康评估问卷。五项研究评估了这些工具的测量特性,但没有一项符合 COSMIN-OMERACT 清单的所有标准。

结论

PMR 研究中结局的测量缺乏一致性。关键的以患者为中心的身体功能领域评估不足。考虑纳入核心结局测量集的候选工具中,没有一种工具具有基于 PMR 患者的、关于其全面测量特性的高质量证据。需要进一步研究来确定这些工具是否适合纳入 PMR 的核心结局测量集。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验