• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新辅助治疗后胰腺、胃和直肠肿瘤淋巴结切除的意义。

Significance of Lymph Node Resection After Neoadjuvant Therapy in Pancreatic, Gastric, and Rectal Cancers.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2020 Sep 1;272(3):438-446. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004181.

DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000004181
PMID:32740236
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Gastrointestinal cancers are increasingly being treated with NAT before surgical resection. Currently, quality metrics are linked to the number of LNs resected to determine subsequent treatment and prognosis. We hypothesize that NAT decreases LN metastasis, downstages patients, and decreases overall lymph node yields (LNY) compared to initial surgical resection. With increasing use of NAT, this brings into question the validity of quality metrics.

METHODS

Gastric (stage II/III), pancreatic (stage I/II/III), and rectal cancers (stage II/III) (2010-2015) treated with surgery with/without NAT were identified in National Cancer Database. We evaluated total LNY and LN metastasis with/without NAT and clinical and pathological stage to evaluate rates of downstaging.

RESULTS

A total of 7934 gastric, 15,908 pancreatic, and 21,354 rectal cancer patients were included of which 61.1%, 21.2%, and 85.7% received NAT, respectively. NAT patients were more likely to be downstaged (39.9% vs 11.1% gastric P< 0.001, 30.6% vs 3.2% pancreatic P< 0.001, 52.0% vs 16.3% rectal P< 0.001), have lower LNYs (18.8 vs 19.1 gastric P = 0.239, 18.4 vs 17.5 pancreatic P< 0.001, 15.7 vs 20.0 rectal P< 0.001) and have N0 pathologic disease (43.6% vs 26.7% gastric P< 0.001, 51.1% vs 30.9% pancreatic P< 0.001, 65.9% vs 49.4% rectal P< 0.001) when compared to initial surgical resection.

CONCLUSION

NAT for gastrointestinal cancers results in overall lower LN yields, lower LN metastases, and significant downstaging of tumors. As all patients undergoing NAT receive multimodality therapy, LN yield recommendations may not be true quality metric changing.

摘要

目的

在手术切除前,越来越多的胃肠道癌症患者接受新辅助治疗(NAT)。目前,质量指标与切除的淋巴结数量相关联,以确定后续治疗和预后。我们假设与初始手术切除相比,NAT 可降低淋巴结转移率、降低患者分期并减少总体淋巴结产量(LNY)。随着 NAT 使用的增加,这对质量指标的有效性提出了质疑。

方法

在国家癌症数据库中确定了 2010 年至 2015 年间接受手术联合/不联合 NAT 治疗的胃(II/III 期)、胰腺(I/II/III 期)和直肠(II/III 期)癌患者。我们评估了有/无 NAT 的总 LNY 和淋巴结转移情况以及临床和病理分期,以评估降级率。

结果

共纳入 7934 例胃癌、15908 例胰腺癌和 21354 例直肠癌患者,其中分别有 61.1%、21.2%和 85.7%接受了 NAT。NAT 患者更有可能降级(39.9%比 11.1%的胃癌 P<0.001,30.6%比 3.2%的胰腺癌 P<0.001,52.0%比 16.3%的直肠癌 P<0.001),LNY 更低(18.8 比 19.1 的胃癌 P=0.239,18.4 比 17.5 的胰腺癌 P<0.001,15.7 比 20.0 的直肠癌 P<0.001),并且无病理疾病的淋巴结(43.6%比 26.7%的胃癌 P<0.001,51.1%比 30.9%的胰腺癌 P<0.001,65.9%比 49.4%的直肠癌 P<0.001)。

结论

胃肠道癌症的 NAT 治疗总体上导致较低的淋巴结产量、较低的淋巴结转移和肿瘤显著降级。由于所有接受 NAT 的患者都接受了多模式治疗,因此淋巴结产量推荐可能不是真正的质量指标变化。

相似文献

1
Significance of Lymph Node Resection After Neoadjuvant Therapy in Pancreatic, Gastric, and Rectal Cancers.新辅助治疗后胰腺、胃和直肠肿瘤淋巴结切除的意义。
Ann Surg. 2020 Sep 1;272(3):438-446. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004181.
2
Resected irradiated rectal cancers: Are twelve lymph nodes really necessary in the era of neoadjuvant therapy?根治性放疗后的直肠癌:在新辅助治疗时代,真的需要 12 个淋巴结吗?
Am J Surg. 2018 Sep;216(3):444-449. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.08.014. Epub 2017 Aug 26.
3
Who Should Get Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation?新辅助放化疗后哪些患者应行侧方盆腔淋巴结清扫术?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2019 Oct;62(10):1158-1166. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001465.
4
Neoadjuvant chemoradiation is associated with decreased lymph node ratio in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: A propensity score matched analysis.新辅助放化疗与边界可切除胰腺癌中淋巴结比率降低相关:倾向评分匹配分析。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2021 Feb;20(1):74-79. doi: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2020.08.001. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
5
Lymph node metastases in rectal cancer after preoperative radiochemotherapy: impact of intramesorectal distribution and residual micrometastatic involvement.直肠癌术前放化疗后淋巴结转移:直肠内分布和残留微转移受累的影响。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2013 Aug;37(8):1283-9. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3182886ced.
6
Lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic factor in node positive rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by curative resection.淋巴结比率是接受术前放化疗后行根治性切除的淋巴结阳性直肠癌患者的独立预后因素。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(13):5365-9. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.13.5365.
7
Lymph node identification following neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: A stage-stratified analysis using the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER)-medicare database.直肠癌新辅助治疗后的淋巴结识别:使用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)-医疗保险数据库进行的分期分层分析。
J Surg Oncol. 2015 Sep;112(4):415-20. doi: 10.1002/jso.23991. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
8
Tumour stage and preoperative chemoradiotherapy influence the lymph node yield in stages I-III rectal cancer: results from a prospective nationwide cohort study.肿瘤分期和术前放化疗影响Ⅰ-Ⅲ期直肠癌的淋巴结检出数:一项前瞻性全国队列研究结果。
Colorectal Dis. 2014 Apr;16(4):O144-9. doi: 10.1111/codi.12521.
9
Lymph node yield is an independent predictor of survival in rectal cancer regardless of receipt of neoadjuvant therapy.无论是否接受新辅助治疗,淋巴结获取数量都是直肠癌患者生存的独立预测因素。
J Clin Pathol. 2017 Jul;70(7):584-592. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2016-203995. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
10
Selective lateral lymph node dissection after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer.直肠癌新辅助放化疗后选择性侧方淋巴结清扫。
World J Gastroenterol. 2020 Jun 7;26(21):2877-2888. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i21.2877.

引用本文的文献

1
A predictive nomogram for assessing the likelihood of retrieving 12 lymph nodes after rectal cancer surgery: a single-center study.评估直肠癌手术后获取12枚淋巴结可能性的预测列线图:一项单中心研究
Front Oncol. 2025 Aug 25;15:1617058. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1617058. eCollection 2025.
2
Utility and clinical significance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for diagnosing lymphadenopathies in biliary tract cancer.内镜超声引导下组织获取在诊断胆道癌淋巴结病变中的应用价值及临床意义
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 27;15(1):3363. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87473-y.
3
D2 Lymphadenectomy for Gastric Cancer: Advancements and Technical Considerations.
胃癌的D2淋巴结清扫术:进展与技术考量
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Mar;32(3):2129-2140. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16545-6. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
4
Assessment of Laparoscopic Spleen-Preserving Hilar Lymphadenectomy for Advanced Proximal Gastric Cancer Without Invasion Into the Greater Curvature: A Randomized Clinical Trial.腹腔镜保留脾脏贲门周围淋巴结清扫术治疗未侵犯大弯侧的进展期近端胃癌的评估:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2023 Jan 1;158(1):10-18. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.5307.
5
Total Neoadjuvant Treatment for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Is Associated With Limited Lymph Node Yield but Improved Ratio.全新辅助治疗胰腺导管腺癌与淋巴结获取量有限相关,但改善了比例。
J Surg Res. 2022 Dec;280:543-550. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.08.002. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
6
Comparison of Four Lymph Node Staging Systems in Gastric Adenocarcinoma after Neoadjuvant Therapy - A Population-Based Study.新辅助治疗后胃腺癌四种淋巴结分期系统的比较——一项基于人群的研究
Front Surg. 2022 May 27;9:918198. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.918198. eCollection 2022.
7
A greater lymph node yield is required during pathological examination in microsatellite instability-high gastric cancer.在微卫星不稳定型高胃癌的病理检查中需要获得更多的淋巴结。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Mar 25;21(1):319. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08044-8.