• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Total Neoadjuvant Treatment for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Is Associated With Limited Lymph Node Yield but Improved Ratio.全新辅助治疗胰腺导管腺癌与淋巴结获取量有限相关,但改善了比例。
J Surg Res. 2022 Dec;280:543-550. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.08.002. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
2
Neoadjuvant therapy is associated with a reduced lymph node ratio in patients with potentially resectable pancreatic cancer.新辅助治疗与潜在可切除胰腺癌患者的淋巴结比率降低有关。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Apr;22(4):1168-75. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4192-6. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
3
[The relationship between the index of lymph node metastasis and the prognosis of pancreatic cancer patients after R0 resection].[淋巴结转移指数与胰腺癌患者R0切除术后预后的关系]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2020 Jun 23;42(6):474-479. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20191125-00760.
4
The number and ratio of positive lymph nodes affect pancreatic cancer patient survival after neoadjuvant therapy and pancreaticoduodenectomy.阳性淋巴结的数量和比例影响新辅助治疗及胰十二指肠切除术后胰腺癌患者的生存情况。
Histopathology. 2016 Jan;68(2):210-20. doi: 10.1111/his.12732. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
5
Prognostic assessment of different lymph node staging methods for pancreatic cancer with R0 resection: pN staging, lymph node ratio, log odds of positive lymph nodes.R0切除的胰腺癌不同淋巴结分期方法的预后评估:pN分期、淋巴结比率、阳性淋巴结的对数优势比
Pancreatology. 2014 Jul-Aug;14(4):289-94. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2014.05.794. Epub 2014 Jun 14.
6
Total neoadjuvant therapy is associated with improved overall survival and pathologic response in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.新辅助治疗与胰腺腺癌患者总生存和病理缓解改善相关。
J Surg Oncol. 2022 Sep;126(3):502-512. doi: 10.1002/jso.26906. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
7
Can standardized pathology examination increase the lymph node yield following laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma?标准化病理检查能否提高导管腺癌腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术后的淋巴结获取量?
HPB (Oxford). 2018 Feb;20(2):175-181. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.08.038. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
8
Neoadjuvant chemoradiation is associated with decreased lymph node ratio in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: A propensity score matched analysis.新辅助放化疗与边界可切除胰腺癌中淋巴结比率降低相关:倾向评分匹配分析。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2021 Feb;20(1):74-79. doi: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2020.08.001. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
9
Prognostic impact of lymph node status in patients after total pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A strobe-compliant study.胰腺导管腺癌全胰切除术后患者淋巴结状态的预后影响:一项符合STROBE标准的研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Feb;99(8):e19327. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019327.
10
Lymph node ratio versus number of affected lymph nodes as predictors of survival for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma.淋巴结比率与受影响的淋巴结数量作为可切除胰腺腺癌生存的预测指标。
World J Surg. 2010 Apr;34(4):768-75. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0336-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing and validating a computed tomography radiomics strategy to predict lymph node metastasis in pancreatic cancer.开发并验证一种用于预测胰腺癌淋巴结转移的计算机断层扫描放射组学策略。
World J Radiol. 2025 Aug 28;17(8):109373. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i8.109373.
2
Prediction of 5-year postoperative survival and analysis of key prognostic factors in stage III colorectal cancer patients using novel machine learning algorithms.使用新型机器学习算法预测III期结直肠癌患者术后5年生存率并分析关键预后因素
Front Oncol. 2025 Jul 14;15:1604386. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1604386. eCollection 2025.
3
Development of a prognostic model based on positive lymph node ratio for yp stage III colorectal cancer.基于阳性淋巴结比率的yp III期结直肠癌预后模型的开发。
Updates Surg. 2025 Jun 23. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02298-8.
4
Prognosis Associated with Complete Pathological Response Following Neoadjuvant Treatment for PancreaTic AdenOcarciNOma in the FOFLIRINOX Era: the Multicenter TONO Study.FOFLIRINOX时代新辅助治疗后胰腺导管腺癌完全病理缓解的预后:多中心TONO研究
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Apr;32(4):2809-2818. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16735-2. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
5
Preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19.9 level predicts lymph node metastasis in resectable adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: a further plea for biological resectability criteria.术前糖类抗原19.9水平可预测可切除性胰头腺癌的淋巴结转移:进一步呼吁采用生物学可切除性标准。
Int J Surg. 2024 Oct 1;110(10):6092-6099. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000773.
6
Nomogram for predicting the preoperative lymph node metastasis in resectable pancreatic cancer.用于预测可切除胰腺癌术前淋巴结转移的列线图。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Oct;149(13):12469-12477. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05048-8. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
7
Neoadjuvant Treatments for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Where We Are and Where We Are Going.胰腺导管腺癌的新辅助治疗:我们所处的位置与前进的方向
J Clin Med. 2023 May 25;12(11):3677. doi: 10.3390/jcm12113677.
8
Editorial: Neoadjuvant treatment for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.社论:可切除及边界可切除胰腺癌的新辅助治疗
Front Oncol. 2023 Jan 25;13:1138587. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1138587. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Trials of Systemic Chemotherapy for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Review.可切除胰腺癌的系统化疗临床试验:综述。
JAMA Surg. 2021 Jul 1;156(7):663-672. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0149.
2
Pancreatic cancer in the era of COVID-19 pandemic: Which one is the lesser of two evils?新冠疫情时代的胰腺癌:两害相权,何者为轻?
World J Clin Oncol. 2021 Feb 24;12(2):54-60. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i2.54.
3
Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Operable Pancreatic Cancer.可切除胰腺癌的全新辅助治疗
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Apr;28(4):2246-2256. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09149-3. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
4
Lymph Node Ratio as a Prognostic Marker in Pancreatic Cancer Survival: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.淋巴结比率作为胰腺癌生存预后标志物的系统评价与Meta分析
Cureus. 2020 Aug 6;12(8):e9597. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9597.
5
Significance of Lymph Node Resection After Neoadjuvant Therapy in Pancreatic, Gastric, and Rectal Cancers.新辅助治疗后胰腺、胃和直肠肿瘤淋巴结切除的意义。
Ann Surg. 2020 Sep 1;272(3):438-446. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004181.
6
Surgical Outcome Results From SWOG S1505: A Randomized Clinical Trial of mFOLFIRINOX Versus Gemcitabine/Nab-paclitaxel for Perioperative Treatment of Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.SWOG S1505 研究的手术结果:吉西他滨/白蛋白紫杉醇对比改良 FOLFIRINOX 用于可切除胰腺导管腺癌围手术期治疗的随机临床试验。
Ann Surg. 2020 Sep 1;272(3):481-486. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004155.
7
Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Versus Immediate Surgery for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Results of the Dutch Randomized Phase III PREOPANC Trial.可切除及临界可切除胰腺癌的术前放化疗与直接手术对比:荷兰随机III期PREOPANC试验结果
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jun 1;38(16):1763-1773. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02274. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
8
Lymph node ratio as valuable predictor in pancreatic cancer treated with R0 resection and adjuvant treatment.淋巴结比率是 R0 切除和辅助治疗胰腺癌的有价值的预测指标。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Oct 15;19(1):952. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6193-0.
9
Completion of Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Upfront Surgical Resection for Pancreatic Cancer Is Uncommon Yet Associated With Improved Survival.术前手术切除后完成辅助化疗在胰腺癌中并不常见,但与改善生存有关。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Nov;26(12):4108-4116. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07602-6. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
10
Prognostic Value of Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio in Pancreatic Cancer.转移性淋巴结比率在胰腺癌中的预后价值
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2019 Mar;10(1):50-54. doi: 10.1007/s13193-018-0824-9. Epub 2018 Oct 26.

全新辅助治疗胰腺导管腺癌与淋巴结获取量有限相关,但改善了比例。

Total Neoadjuvant Treatment for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Is Associated With Limited Lymph Node Yield but Improved Ratio.

机构信息

Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2022 Dec;280:543-550. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.08.002. Epub 2022 Sep 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2022.08.002
PMID:36096019
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9631810/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The lymph node yield (LNY) and lymph node ratio (LNR) of nodal metastases following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) have been reported as prognostic parameters in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, they have not been compared in the setting of various neoadjuvant therapy modalities.

METHODS

A single institutional retrospective study identified 134 patients diagnosed with resectable, BLR- and LA-PDAC who underwent PD at Fox Chase Cancer Center between 2010 and 2019. Patients were categorized based on first-line treatment as follows: surgery first (SF), total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), and single modality neoadjuvant therapy (SMNT). The histopathological reports of the surgical specimens were examined to obtain LNY and determine the counts of lymph nodes with metastases. Subsequently, LNR was calculated as the number of positive lymph nodes divided by the number of lymph nodes examined.

RESULTS

Overall, 49, 38, 27, 12, and 8 patients underwent SF approach, SMNT, incomplete TNT, induction TNT, and consolidation TNT, respectively. There was no difference in R0 resection and vascular resection between the groups (P = 0.096 and 0.794, respectively). The median counts of LNY were 22, 15, 21, 11.5, and 10, respectively (P < 0.001). The average LNR was 0.16, 0.07, 0.03, 0.02, and 0.02, respectively (P < 0.001). There were statistically significant differences in overall survival in the TNT groups (log-rank test P = 0.030).

CONCLUSIONS

PDAC patients who undergo the TNT modality exhibit lower LNY and improved LNR compared with the SF approach and SMNT neoadjuvant therapy groups. This is likely explained by the increased treatment response and lymph node obliteration associated with the TNT approach. Our results question the minimal requirement of 11-18 harvested lymph nodes for PD following TNT.

摘要

简介

淋巴结转移率(LNY)和淋巴结比率(LNR)已被报道为胰十二指肠切除术(PD)后胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)患者的预后参数。然而,它们在各种新辅助治疗模式下尚未进行比较。

方法

一项单机构回顾性研究纳入了 2010 年至 2019 年期间在 Fox Chase Cancer Center 接受 PD 治疗的 134 例可切除、BLR 和 LA-PDAC 患者。患者根据一线治疗分为以下几类:手术优先(SF)、完全新辅助治疗(TNT)和单一模式新辅助治疗(SMNT)。检查手术标本的组织病理学报告以获取 LNY 并确定转移淋巴结的数量。随后,将 LNR 计算为阳性淋巴结数除以检查的淋巴结数。

结果

总体而言,分别有 49、38、27、12 和 8 例患者接受了 SF 方法、SMNT、不完全 TNT、诱导 TNT 和巩固 TNT。各组之间 RO 切除和血管切除无差异(P=0.096 和 0.794)。LNY 的中位数分别为 22、15、21、11.5 和 10(P<0.001)。平均 LNR 分别为 0.16、0.07、0.03、0.02 和 0.02(P<0.001)。TNT 组的总生存率存在统计学差异(对数秩检验 P=0.030)。

结论

与 SF 方法和 SMNT 新辅助治疗组相比,接受 TNT 治疗的 PDAC 患者的 LNY 较低,LNR 改善。这可能是由于 TNT 方法与治疗反应增加和淋巴结破坏有关。我们的结果质疑了 TNT 后 PD 所需的 11-18 个切除淋巴结的最低要求。