Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
J Surg Res. 2022 Dec;280:543-550. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.08.002. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
The lymph node yield (LNY) and lymph node ratio (LNR) of nodal metastases following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) have been reported as prognostic parameters in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, they have not been compared in the setting of various neoadjuvant therapy modalities.
A single institutional retrospective study identified 134 patients diagnosed with resectable, BLR- and LA-PDAC who underwent PD at Fox Chase Cancer Center between 2010 and 2019. Patients were categorized based on first-line treatment as follows: surgery first (SF), total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), and single modality neoadjuvant therapy (SMNT). The histopathological reports of the surgical specimens were examined to obtain LNY and determine the counts of lymph nodes with metastases. Subsequently, LNR was calculated as the number of positive lymph nodes divided by the number of lymph nodes examined.
Overall, 49, 38, 27, 12, and 8 patients underwent SF approach, SMNT, incomplete TNT, induction TNT, and consolidation TNT, respectively. There was no difference in R0 resection and vascular resection between the groups (P = 0.096 and 0.794, respectively). The median counts of LNY were 22, 15, 21, 11.5, and 10, respectively (P < 0.001). The average LNR was 0.16, 0.07, 0.03, 0.02, and 0.02, respectively (P < 0.001). There were statistically significant differences in overall survival in the TNT groups (log-rank test P = 0.030).
PDAC patients who undergo the TNT modality exhibit lower LNY and improved LNR compared with the SF approach and SMNT neoadjuvant therapy groups. This is likely explained by the increased treatment response and lymph node obliteration associated with the TNT approach. Our results question the minimal requirement of 11-18 harvested lymph nodes for PD following TNT.
淋巴结转移率(LNY)和淋巴结比率(LNR)已被报道为胰十二指肠切除术(PD)后胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)患者的预后参数。然而,它们在各种新辅助治疗模式下尚未进行比较。
一项单机构回顾性研究纳入了 2010 年至 2019 年期间在 Fox Chase Cancer Center 接受 PD 治疗的 134 例可切除、BLR 和 LA-PDAC 患者。患者根据一线治疗分为以下几类:手术优先(SF)、完全新辅助治疗(TNT)和单一模式新辅助治疗(SMNT)。检查手术标本的组织病理学报告以获取 LNY 并确定转移淋巴结的数量。随后,将 LNR 计算为阳性淋巴结数除以检查的淋巴结数。
总体而言,分别有 49、38、27、12 和 8 例患者接受了 SF 方法、SMNT、不完全 TNT、诱导 TNT 和巩固 TNT。各组之间 RO 切除和血管切除无差异(P=0.096 和 0.794)。LNY 的中位数分别为 22、15、21、11.5 和 10(P<0.001)。平均 LNR 分别为 0.16、0.07、0.03、0.02 和 0.02(P<0.001)。TNT 组的总生存率存在统计学差异(对数秩检验 P=0.030)。
与 SF 方法和 SMNT 新辅助治疗组相比,接受 TNT 治疗的 PDAC 患者的 LNY 较低,LNR 改善。这可能是由于 TNT 方法与治疗反应增加和淋巴结破坏有关。我们的结果质疑了 TNT 后 PD 所需的 11-18 个切除淋巴结的最低要求。