Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
School of Nursing, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Pediatr Diabetes. 2020 Nov;21(7):1343-1352. doi: 10.1111/pedi.13099. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
Youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D) commonly do not meet HbA1c targets. Youth-directed goal setting as a strategy to improve HbA1c has not been well characterized and associations between specific goal focus areas and glycemic control remain unexplored.
To inform future trials, this analysis characterized intended focus areas of youth self-directed goals and examined associations with change in HbA1c over a 18 months.
We inductively coded counseling session data from youth in the Flexible Lifestyle Empowering Change Intervention (n = 122, 13-16 years, T1D duration >1 year, HbA1c 8-13%) to categorize intended goal focus areas and examine associations between frequency of goal focus areas selected by youth and change in HbA1c between first and last study visit.
We identified 13 focus areas that categorized youth goal intentions. Each session where youth goal setting concurrently incorporated blood glucose monitoring (BGM), continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), and insulin dosing was associated with a 0.4% (95% CI: -0.77, -0.01; P = .03) lower HbA1c at the end of intervention participation. No association was observed between HbA1c and frequency of sessions where goal intentions focused on BG only (without addressing insulin or CGM) (β: 0.07; 95% CI: -0.07, 0.21; P = .33) nor insulin dosing only (without addressing BGM or CGM) (β: 0.00; 95% CI: -0.11, 0.10; P = .95).
Findings exemplify how guiding youth goal development and combining multiple behaviors proximally related to glycemic control into goal setting may benefit HbA1c among youth with T1D. More research characterizing optimal goal setting practices in youth with T1D is needed.
患有 1 型糖尿病(T1D)的年轻人通常无法达到 HbA1c 目标。以设定青年人为导向的目标作为改善 HbA1c 的策略尚未得到充分描述,特定目标重点领域与血糖控制之间的关联仍未得到探索。
为了为未来的试验提供信息,本分析描述了年轻人自我设定目标的预期重点领域,并研究了这些目标与 HbA1c 在 18 个月内变化的关系。
我们对来自灵活生活方式赋权改变干预(n=122,年龄 13-16 岁,T1D 病程>1 年,HbA1c 8-13%)中的年轻人的咨询会议数据进行了归纳编码,以对目标重点领域进行分类,并研究年轻人选择的目标重点领域的频率与研究开始和结束时之间 HbA1c 变化之间的关系。
我们确定了 13 个重点领域,将年轻人的目标意图进行了分类。每次年轻人在设定目标时同时结合了血糖监测(BGM)、连续血糖监测(CGM)和胰岛素剂量调整,都会导致干预结束时 HbA1c 降低 0.4%(95%CI:-0.77,-0.01;P=0.03)。但在仅关注血糖(不涉及胰岛素或 CGM)的目标设定会议(β:0.07;95%CI:-0.07,0.21;P=0.33)或仅关注胰岛素剂量(不涉及 BGM 或 CGM)的目标设定会议(β:0.00;95%CI:-0.11,0.10;P=0.95)与 HbA1c 之间没有观察到关联。
这些发现例证了指导年轻人制定目标并将与血糖控制密切相关的多种行为纳入目标设定中如何使 T1D 青少年的 HbA1c 受益。需要对 T1D 青少年中最佳目标设定实践进行更多研究。