• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知障碍患者和痴呆患者的偏好:定量患者偏好研究的系统评价。

Preferences of Cognitively Impaired Patients and Patients Living with Dementia: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Patient Preference Studies.

机构信息

German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), site Rostock/Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.

Institute for Community Medicine, Section Epidemiology of Health Care and Community Health, University Medicine Greifswald (UMG), Greifswald, Germany.

出版信息

J Alzheimers Dis. 2020;77(2):885-901. doi: 10.3233/JAD-191299.

DOI:10.3233/JAD-191299
PMID:32741807
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Treatment decisions based on guidelines rather than patients' preferences determine adherence to and compliance with treatment, which, in turn, could improve health-related outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To summarize the stated treatment and care preferences of people with dementia (PwD).

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted to assess the stated preferences of PwD. The inclusion criterion was the use of quantitative methods to elicit stated preferences, enabling a ranking of preferences.

RESULTS

Eleven studies revealed preferences for diagnostics, treatment decisions, patient-related outcomes, care services, end-of-life care, leisure activities, and digital life story work. PwDs prefer accurate, pain-free, and comfortable diagnostic procedures without radioactive markers as well as being accompanied by a caregiver. PwD's quality of life (QoL), self-efficacy, and depression were equally most important for PwD and caregivers. However, PwD memory was only important for caregivers but not for PwD, and caregiver QoL was moderately important for PwD but least important for caregivers. Additionally, comfort and family involvement were most important for patients' end-of-life care, whereas caregivers most preferred good communication and pain management. Also, preferences depend on the living situation: Patients living not alone prefer a regular care provider most, whereas those living alone only want to live nearby the caregiver. Preferences for leisure activities did not differ between past and present ratings, indicating that PwD prefer activities that have always been carried out.

CONCLUSION

Only a few studies have applied quantitative methods to elicit the preferences of PwD. More research is needed to capture the stated preferences for the treatment, care, and support of PwD to improve health-related outcomes and the allocation of healthcare resources.

摘要

背景

基于指南而非患者偏好做出的治疗决策决定了治疗的依从性和遵从性,而这反过来又可以改善与健康相关的结果。

目的

总结痴呆症患者(PwD)的既定治疗和护理偏好。

方法

进行了一项系统评价,以评估 PwD 的既定偏好。纳入标准是使用定量方法引出既定偏好,从而对偏好进行排序。

结果

11 项研究揭示了对诊断、治疗决策、患者相关结局、护理服务、临终关怀、休闲活动和数字生活故事工作的偏好。PwD 更喜欢准确、无痛和舒适的无放射性标记的诊断程序,并希望有护理人员陪伴。PwD 的生活质量(QoL)、自我效能感和抑郁对 PwD 和护理人员同等重要。然而,PwD 的记忆对护理人员很重要,但对 PwD 不重要,而护理人员的生活质量对 PwD 很重要,但对护理人员不重要。此外,舒适和家庭参与对患者临终关怀最重要,而护理人员最希望有良好的沟通和疼痛管理。此外,偏好取决于生活状况:不住在一起的患者最希望有一个固定的护理提供者,而独居的患者只希望住在护理人员附近。对休闲活动的偏好没有过去和现在的评分差异,这表明 PwD 更喜欢一直进行的活动。

结论

只有少数研究应用定量方法来引出 PwD 的偏好。需要更多的研究来捕捉 PwD 对治疗、护理和支持的既定偏好,以改善与健康相关的结果和医疗资源的分配。

相似文献

1
Preferences of Cognitively Impaired Patients and Patients Living with Dementia: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Patient Preference Studies.认知障碍患者和痴呆患者的偏好:定量患者偏好研究的系统评价。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2020;77(2):885-901. doi: 10.3233/JAD-191299.
2
Advance Care Planning in Dementia: Do Family Carers Know the Treatment Preferences of People with Early Dementia?痴呆症患者的预先护理计划:家庭护理人员是否了解早期痴呆症患者的治疗偏好?
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 13;11(7):e0159056. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159056. eCollection 2016.
3
Predictors of self- and caregiver-rated quality of life for people with dementia living in the community and in nursing homes in northern Taiwan.预测居住在台湾北部社区和养老院的痴呆症患者的自我和护理人员生活质量。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2015 May;27(5):825-36. doi: 10.1017/S1041610214002506. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
4
Priorities and Preferences of People Living with Dementia or Cognitive Impairment - A Systematic Review.痴呆症或认知障碍患者的优先事项和偏好——一项系统综述
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Dec 14;15:2793-2807. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S333923. eCollection 2021.
5
Effect of Collaborative Dementia Care via Telephone and Internet on Quality of Life, Caregiver Well-being, and Health Care Use: The Care Ecosystem Randomized Clinical Trial.电话和互联网协作式痴呆护理对生活质量、照顾者幸福感和医疗保健利用的影响:护理生态系统随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Dec 1;179(12):1658-1667. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.4101.
6
Preferences for end-of-life treatment: concordance between older adults with dementia or mild cognitive impairment and their spouses.临终治疗偏好:痴呆或轻度认知障碍老年人与其配偶之间的一致性。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2012 Nov;24(11):1798-804. doi: 10.1017/S1041610212000877. Epub 2012 May 22.
7
Predictors of unmet needs in Chilean older people with dementia: a cross-sectional study.智利痴呆老年人群中未满足需求的预测因素:一项横断面研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Apr 15;19(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1131-1.
8
Predictors of quality of life ratings for persons with dementia simultaneously reported by patients and their caregivers: the Cache County (Utah) Study.患者及其照护者同时报告的痴呆患者生活质量评分的预测因素:Cache 县(犹他州)研究。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2012 Jul;24(7):1094-102. doi: 10.1017/S1041610212000063. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
9
Quality of life of community-residing persons with dementia based on self-rated and caregiver-rated measures.基于自评和照料者评价的社区居住痴呆患者的生活质量。
Qual Life Res. 2012 Oct;21(8):1379-89. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-0044-z. Epub 2011 Oct 26.
10
Psychological well-being over time among informal caregivers caring for persons with dementia living at home.长期居家照顾痴呆患者的非正式照护者的心理健康状况。
Aging Ment Health. 2017 Nov;21(11):1138-1146. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2016.1211621. Epub 2016 Jul 27.

引用本文的文献

1
From suspicion of cognitive decline to dementia diagnosis: a systematic review of healthcare professionals' considerations and attitudes.从认知能力下降的怀疑到痴呆症诊断:对医疗保健专业人员的考量与态度的系统评价
Age Ageing. 2025 May 31;54(6). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaf176.
2
Characteristics, Needs, and Perspectives of Individuals Living Alone With Dementia: An Integrative Review.独居痴呆症患者的特征、需求与展望:一项综合综述
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 23;8(1):e70348. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70348. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3
Development and evaluation of a caregiver checklist for primary care.
基层医疗护理人员清单的开发与评估
Fam Syst Health. 2024 Nov 21. doi: 10.1037/fsh0000937.
4
Clinically Important Benefits and Harms of Monoclonal Antibodies Targeting Amyloid for the Treatment of Alzheimer Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.针对阿尔茨海默病治疗的靶向淀粉样蛋白的单克隆抗体的临床重要获益和危害:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Fam Med. 2024 Jan-Feb;22(1):50-62. doi: 10.1370/afm.3050.
5
A Best-Worst Scaling Study of the General Population's Preferences for Activities in Living Arrangements for Persons With Dementia.一项针对一般人群在痴呆症患者居住安排中活动偏好的最佳-最差标度研究。
Patient. 2024 Mar;17(2):121-131. doi: 10.1007/s40271-023-00661-8. Epub 2023 Dec 8.
6
Preferences for deprescribing antihypertensive medications amongst clinicians, carers and people living with dementia: a discrete choice experiment.降压药物停药偏好研究:临床医生、护理人员和痴呆症患者的离散选择实验。
Age Ageing. 2023 Aug 1;52(8). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad153.
7
A systematic review to identify the use of stated preference research in the field of older adult care.一项旨在确定老年人护理领域中陈述性偏好研究应用情况的系统评价。
Eur J Ageing. 2022 Nov 7;19(4):1005-1056. doi: 10.1007/s10433-022-00738-7. eCollection 2022 Dec.
8
Do They Align? Congruence Between Patient Preferences of People Living with Cognitive Impairments and Physicians' Judgements for Person-Centered Care: An Analytic Hierarchy Process Study.他们一致吗?认知障碍患者的偏好与医生的判断对于以患者为中心的护理的一致性:一项层次分析法研究。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2023;91(2):727-741. doi: 10.3233/JAD-220753.
9
The cultural adaptation of the go wish card game for use in Flanders, Belgium: a public health tool to identify and discuss end-of-life preferences.将“go wish 卡牌游戏”文化改编,用于比利时佛兰德斯地区:一种公共卫生工具,用于识别和讨论临终偏好。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Nov 17;22(1):2110. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14523-9.
10
Development of a Quantitative Preference Instrument for Person-Centered Dementia Care-Stage 2: Insights from a Formative Qualitative Study to Design and Pretest a Dementia-Friendly Analytic Hierarchy Process Survey.开发以患者为中心的痴呆症护理为导向的定量偏好工具 - 第 2 阶段:形成性定性研究的见解,以设计和预测试痴呆症友好的层次分析法调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 13;19(14):8554. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148554.