• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1型糖尿病儿童和青少年中闪光葡萄糖监测扫描频率与持续葡萄糖监测得出的血糖指标之间的关联

Association between scanning frequency of flash glucose monitoring and continuous glucose monitoring-derived glycemic makers in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.

作者信息

Suzuki Junichi, Urakami Tatsuhiko, Yoshida Kei, Kuwabara Remi, Mine Yusuke, Aoki Masako, Morioka Ichiro

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Pediatr Int. 2021 Feb;63(2):154-159. doi: 10.1111/ped.14412. Epub 2021 Feb 15.

DOI:10.1111/ped.14412
PMID:32744360
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We assessed the association between scanning frequency of flash glucose monitoring (FGM) and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-derived glycemic markers in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.

METHODS

Subjects consisted of 85 children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes using FGM. We assessed the association between scanning frequencies of FGM- and CGM-derived metrics: Time in range (TIR) (70-180 mg/dL), time below range (TBR) (<70 mg/dL), time above range (>180 mg/dL), and other glycemic markers - laboratory-measured HbA1c and CGM-estimated glucose and HbA1c (eA1c) levels in the subjects.

RESULTS

The mean number of scans was 11.5 ± 3.5 (5-20) times per day, and scanning was most frequently conducted during a period of 18-24 h. Scanning frequency showed significant positive correlation with TIR (r = 0.719, P < 0.0001) and inverse correlation with time above range (r = -0.743, P < 0.0001), but did not correlate with TBR. There were also significant inverse correlations between scanning frequency and glucose, HbA1c, and eA1c levels (r = -0.765, -0.815, and -0.793, respectively, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Frequent glucose testing with FGM decreased hyperglycemia with increased TIR, but did not reduce TBR. Coping with a rapid fall of glucose and unexpected hypoglycemia with more advanced technology might contribute to a reduction in TBR.

摘要

背景

我们评估了1型糖尿病儿童和青少年中闪光葡萄糖监测(FGM)的扫描频率与连续葡萄糖监测(CGM)得出的血糖指标之间的关联。

方法

研究对象为85名使用FGM的1型糖尿病儿童和青少年。我们评估了FGM扫描频率与CGM得出的指标之间的关联:血糖达标时间(TIR)(70 - 180mg/dL)、血糖低于范围时间(TBR)(<70mg/dL)、血糖高于范围时间(>180mg/dL)以及其他血糖指标——受试者实验室测量的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)以及CGM估算的血糖和糖化血红蛋白(eA1c)水平。

结果

平均扫描次数为每天11.5 ± 3.5(5 - 20)次,扫描最频繁的时间段为18 - 24小时。扫描频率与TIR呈显著正相关(r = 0.719,P < 0.0001),与血糖高于范围时间呈负相关(r = -0.743,P < 0.0001),但与TBR无相关性。扫描频率与血糖、HbA1c和eA1c水平之间也存在显著负相关(分别为r = -0.765、-0.815和-0.793,P < 0.0001)。

结论

通过FGM频繁进行血糖检测可减少高血糖情况,使TIR增加,但并未降低TBR。采用更先进的技术应对血糖快速下降和意外低血糖情况可能有助于降低TBR。

相似文献

1
Association between scanning frequency of flash glucose monitoring and continuous glucose monitoring-derived glycemic makers in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.1型糖尿病儿童和青少年中闪光葡萄糖监测扫描频率与持续葡萄糖监测得出的血糖指标之间的关联
Pediatr Int. 2021 Feb;63(2):154-159. doi: 10.1111/ped.14412. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
2
Individualization of recommendations from the international consensus on continuous glucose monitoring-derived metrics in Japanese children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.国际共识推荐指标在日本 1 型糖尿病儿童和青少年中的个体化应用。
Endocr J. 2020 Oct 28;67(10):1055-1062. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ20-0193. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
3
Significance of "Time below Range" as a Glycemic Marker Derived from Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Japanese Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes.基于连续血糖监测的“时间低于目标范围”作为血糖标志物在日本 1 型糖尿病儿童和青少年中的意义。
Horm Res Paediatr. 2020;93(4):251-257. doi: 10.1159/000510454. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
4
Use of flash glucose-sensing technology (FreeStyle Libre) in youth with type 1 diabetes: AWeSoMe study group real-life observational experience.应用瞬感葡萄糖监测技术(FreeStyle Libre)于 1 型糖尿病青少年患者:AWeSoMe 研究组真实世界观察性经验。
Acta Diabetol. 2018 Dec;55(12):1303-1310. doi: 10.1007/s00592-018-1218-8. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
5
Frequent scanning using flash glucose monitoring contributes to better glycemic control in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.频繁使用瞬感血糖监测有助于改善 1 型糖尿病患儿和青少年的血糖控制。
J Diabetes Investig. 2022 Jan;13(1):185-190. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13618. Epub 2021 Jul 17.
6
Relationship between key continuous glucose monitoring-derived metrics and specific cognitive domains in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.2 型糖尿病患者关键连续血糖监测指标与特定认知领域的关系。
BMC Neurol. 2023 May 20;23(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12883-023-03242-2.
7
Flash glucose monitoring system in patients with type 1 diabetes in healthcare center in Brazil: real world data from a short-term prospective study.巴西医疗中心 1 型糖尿病患者的瞬态血糖监测系统:一项短期前瞻性研究的真实世界数据。
Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2023 Mar 30;67(3):289-297. doi: 10.20945/2359-3997000000540. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
8
Efficacy of flash glucose monitoring in pregnant women with poorly controlled pregestational diabetes (FlashMom): A randomized pilot study.妊娠期糖尿病血糖控制不佳孕妇中应用瞬感葡萄糖监测的疗效(FlashMom):一项随机先导研究。
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2021 Jun 7;31(6):1851-1859. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2021.03.013. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
9
High Glycemic Variability Is Associated with Worse Continuous Glucose Monitoring Metrics in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes.高血糖变异性与 1 型糖尿病儿童和青少年的连续血糖监测指标恶化相关。
Horm Res Paediatr. 2021;94(9-10):369-373. doi: 10.1159/000521430. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
10
Flash Glucose Monitoring in Israel: Understanding Real-World Associations between Self-Monitoring Frequency and Metrics of Glycemic Control.以色列的动态血糖监测:了解自我监测频率与血糖控制指标之间的真实关联。
Endocr Pract. 2022 May;28(5):472-478. doi: 10.1016/j.eprac.2022.02.004. Epub 2022 Feb 12.

引用本文的文献

1
International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2024 Diabetes Technologies: Glucose Monitoring.国际儿童和青少年糖尿病学会2024年临床实践共识指南:糖尿病技术之血糖监测
Horm Res Paediatr. 2024;97(6):615-635. doi: 10.1159/000543156. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
2
Scans per day as predictors of optimal glycemic control in people with type 1 diabetes mellitus using flash glucose monitoring: what number of scans per day should raise a red flag?每天扫描次数可预测使用瞬感葡萄糖监测的 1 型糖尿病患者的血糖控制情况:每天应扫描多少次以引起警惕?
Acta Diabetol. 2024 Mar;61(3):343-350. doi: 10.1007/s00592-023-02204-x. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
3
Implementation of flash glucose monitoring in four pediatric diabetes clinics: controlled before and after study to produce real-world evidence of patient benefit.
在四家儿科糖尿病诊所中实施瞬感血糖监测:一项前瞻性对照研究,旨在提供真实世界的患者获益证据。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2023 Aug;11(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003561.
4
Efficacy of unblinded and blinded intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring for glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes.未盲和盲法间断扫描连续血糖监测在 1 型糖尿病成人血糖控制中的疗效。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Feb 22;14:1110845. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1110845. eCollection 2023.
5
ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Diabetes technologies: Glucose monitoring.国际儿童青少年糖尿病研究学会(ISPAD)2022年临床实践共识指南:糖尿病技术:血糖监测
Pediatr Diabetes. 2022 Dec;23(8):1390-1405. doi: 10.1111/pedi.13451.
6
[Evaluation of FreeStyle Libre in pediatric t1dm: improved glycemic control, reduction in diabetic ketoacidosis and severe hypoglycemia].[儿童1型糖尿病中FreeStyle Libre的评估:改善血糖控制、降低糖尿病酮症酸中毒和严重低血糖症]
Probl Endokrinol (Mosk). 2022 Feb 22;68(3):86-92. doi: 10.14341/probl12877.
7
Frequency of flash glucose monitoring and glucose metrics: real-world observational data from Saudi Arabia.动态血糖监测的频率及血糖指标:来自沙特阿拉伯的真实世界观察性数据。
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2022 May 3;14(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13098-022-00831-y.
8
Frequent scanning using flash glucose monitoring contributes to better glycemic control in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.频繁使用瞬感血糖监测有助于改善 1 型糖尿病患儿和青少年的血糖控制。
J Diabetes Investig. 2022 Jan;13(1):185-190. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13618. Epub 2021 Jul 17.
9
Technological Ecological Momentary Assessment Tools to Study Type 1 Diabetes in Youth: Viewpoint of Methodologies.用于研究青少年1型糖尿病的技术生态瞬时评估工具:方法论视角
JMIR Diabetes. 2021 Jun 3;6(2):e27027. doi: 10.2196/27027.