• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动态血糖监测的频率及血糖指标:来自沙特阿拉伯的真实世界观察性数据。

Frequency of flash glucose monitoring and glucose metrics: real-world observational data from Saudi Arabia.

作者信息

Al-Harbi Mohammad Y, Albunyan Abdulhameed, Alnahari Ahmed, Kao Kalvin, Brandner Laura, El Jammal Manal, Dunn Timothy C

机构信息

Therapeutic Services Deputyship, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2022 May 3;14(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13098-022-00831-y.

DOI:10.1186/s13098-022-00831-y
PMID:35501880
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9063302/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This real-world data study analyzed glucose metrics from FreeStyle Libre flash glucose monitoring in relation to scanning frequency, time in range (TIR) and estimated A1c (eA1c) in Saudi Arabia.

METHODS

Anonymized reader data were analyzed according to scanning frequency quartiles, eA1c categories (<7%,≥7%‒≤9% or>9%) and TIR categories (<50%,≥50%‒≤70% or>70%). Sensors, grouped by reader, were required to have≥120 h of operation. Differences in scanning frequency, eA1c, TIR, time in hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia, and glucose variability (standard deviation [SD] and coefficient of variation [CV]) were analyzed between groups.

RESULTS

6097 readers, 35,747 sensors, and 40 million automatic glucose measurements were analyzed. Patients in the highest scanning frequency quartile (Q4, mean 32.0 scans/day) had lower eA1c (8.47%), greater TIR (46.4%) and lower glucose variation (SD 75.0 mg/dL, CV 38.2%) compared to the lowest quartile (Q1, mean 5.2 scans/day; eA1c 9.77%, TIR 32.8%, SD 94.9 mg/dL, CV 41.3%). Lower eA1c and higher TIR were associated with greater scanning frequency, lower glucose variability and less time in hyperglycemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher scanning frequency in flash glucose users from Saudi Arabia is associated with lower eA1c, higher TIR, lower glucose variability and less time in hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia.

摘要

背景

这项真实世界数据研究分析了沙特阿拉伯使用FreeStyle Libre闪光葡萄糖监测仪测得的葡萄糖指标与扫描频率、血糖达标时间(TIR)和估计糖化血红蛋白(eA1c)之间的关系。

方法

根据扫描频率四分位数、eA1c类别(<7%、≥7%‒≤9%或>9%)和TIR类别(<50%、≥50%‒≤70%或>70%)对匿名的读者数据进行分析。按读者分组的传感器需有≥120小时的运行时间。分析了各组之间在扫描频率、eA1c、TIR、低血糖和高血糖时间以及葡萄糖变异性(标准差[SD]和变异系数[CV])方面的差异。

结果

分析了6097名读者、35747个传感器以及4000万次自动葡萄糖测量值。与最低四分位数组(Q1,平均每天5.2次扫描;eA1c 9.77%,TIR 32.8%,SD 94.9mg/dL,CV 41.3%)相比,最高扫描频率四分位数组(Q4,平均每天32.0次扫描)的患者eA1c较低(8.47%),TIR较高(46.4%),葡萄糖变异性较低(SD 75.0mg/dL,CV 38.2%)。较低的eA1c和较高的TIR与更高的扫描频率、更低的葡萄糖变异性以及更短的高血糖时间相关。

结论

沙特阿拉伯闪光葡萄糖监测仪使用者更高的扫描频率与更低的eA1c、更高的TIR、更低的葡萄糖变异性以及更短的低血糖或高血糖时间相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01aa/9063302/c09ec694c328/13098_2022_831_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01aa/9063302/c09ec694c328/13098_2022_831_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01aa/9063302/c09ec694c328/13098_2022_831_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Frequency of flash glucose monitoring and glucose metrics: real-world observational data from Saudi Arabia.动态血糖监测的频率及血糖指标:来自沙特阿拉伯的真实世界观察性数据。
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2022 May 3;14(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13098-022-00831-y.
2
Flash Glucose Monitoring in Israel: Understanding Real-World Associations between Self-Monitoring Frequency and Metrics of Glycemic Control.以色列的动态血糖监测:了解自我监测频率与血糖控制指标之间的真实关联。
Endocr Pract. 2022 May;28(5):472-478. doi: 10.1016/j.eprac.2022.02.004. Epub 2022 Feb 12.
3
Real world hypoglycaemia related to glucose variability and Flash glucose scan frequency assessed from global FreeStyle Libre data.从全球 FreeStyle Libre 数据评估与血糖波动和 Flash 血糖扫描频率相关的真实世界低血糖事件。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022 Nov;24(11):2102-2107. doi: 10.1111/dom.14795. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
4
Real-world flash glucose monitoring in Brazil: can sensors make a difference in diabetes management in developing countries?巴西的真实世界动态血糖监测:传感器能否在发展中国家的糖尿病管理中发挥作用?
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2020 Jan 7;12:3. doi: 10.1186/s13098-019-0513-z. eCollection 2020.
5
Association between scanning frequency of flash glucose monitoring and continuous glucose monitoring-derived glycemic makers in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.1型糖尿病儿童和青少年中闪光葡萄糖监测扫描频率与持续葡萄糖监测得出的血糖指标之间的关联
Pediatr Int. 2021 Feb;63(2):154-159. doi: 10.1111/ped.14412. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
6
Flash glucose monitoring system in patients with type 1 diabetes in healthcare center in Brazil: real world data from a short-term prospective study.巴西医疗中心 1 型糖尿病患者的瞬态血糖监测系统:一项短期前瞻性研究的真实世界数据。
Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2023 Mar 30;67(3):289-297. doi: 10.20945/2359-3997000000540. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
7
Low Initial Adherence with Flash Glucose Monitoring is Not a Predictor of Long-Term Glycemic Outcomes: Longitudinal Analysis of the Association Between Experience, Adherence, and Glucose Control for FreeStyle Libre Users.动态葡萄糖监测初始依从性低并非长期血糖结果的预测指标:对FreeStyle Libre用户的经验、依从性和血糖控制之间关联的纵向分析
Diabetes Ther. 2023 Jul;14(7):1231-1240. doi: 10.1007/s13300-023-01422-4. Epub 2023 May 22.
8
"Mind the gap please…": estimated vs. measured Ac from continuous measurement of interstitial glucose over a 3-month period in patients with type 1 diabetes.“请注意间隙……”:1型糖尿病患者在3个月期间通过持续测量组织间葡萄糖得出的估算血糖与实测血糖对比
Acta Clin Belg. 2020 Apr;75(2):109-115. doi: 10.1080/17843286.2018.1561780. Epub 2018 Dec 31.
9
Flash glucose monitoring reduces glycemic variability and hypoglycemia: real-world data from Spain.实时血糖监测可降低血糖变异性和低血糖风险:来自西班牙的真实世界数据。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Mar;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-001052.
10
Flash Glucose Monitoring in Croatia: The Optimal Number of Scans per Day to Achieve Good Glycemic Control in Type 1 Diabetes.克罗地亚的瞬感血糖监测:1 型糖尿病患者达到良好血糖控制的最佳每日扫描次数。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Oct 25;59(11):1893. doi: 10.3390/medicina59111893.

引用本文的文献

1
The Relationship Between Hemoglobin A1c, Time in Range, and Glycemic Management Indicator in Patients With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯一家三级医疗医院中1型和2型糖尿病患者的糖化血红蛋白、血糖达标时间与血糖管理指标之间的关系
Cureus. 2024 Jul 6;16(7):e63947. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63947. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Association of scan frequency with CGM-derived metrics and influential factors in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus.扫描频率与1型糖尿病成年患者的连续血糖监测衍生指标及影响因素的关联
Diabetol Int. 2023 Sep 12;15(1):109-116. doi: 10.1007/s13340-023-00655-9. eCollection 2024 Jan.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Association between scanning frequency of flash glucose monitoring and continuous glucose monitoring-derived glycemic makers in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.1型糖尿病儿童和青少年中闪光葡萄糖监测扫描频率与持续葡萄糖监测得出的血糖指标之间的关联
Pediatr Int. 2021 Feb;63(2):154-159. doi: 10.1111/ped.14412. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
2
Frequency of flash glucose monitoring readings, hemoglobin A1c and time in range: a real life study in adults with type 1 diabetes.动态血糖监测读数频率、糖化血红蛋白及血糖达标时间:1型糖尿病成人患者的一项真实生活研究
Acta Diabetol. 2020 Nov;57(11):1395-1397. doi: 10.1007/s00592-020-01577-7. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
3
Assessment of Patient-reported Satisfaction and Metabolic Outcomes Following Initiation of the Second Generation of Flash Glucose Monitoring in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes.
评估 1 型糖尿病患者使用第二代瞬感血糖仪后报告的满意度和代谢结果。
Curr Diabetes Rev. 2024;20(4):e100823219628. doi: 10.2174/1573399820666230810123504.
4
Adherence to glucose monitoring with intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring in patients with type 1 diabetes.1 型糖尿病患者应用间歇性扫描连续血糖监测仪的血糖监测依从性。
Endocrine. 2023 Mar;79(3):477-483. doi: 10.1007/s12020-022-03288-1. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
Flash glucose monitoring reduces glycemic variability and hypoglycemia: real-world data from Spain.
实时血糖监测可降低血糖变异性和低血糖风险:来自西班牙的真实世界数据。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Mar;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-001052.
4
Glycemic variability modifies the relationship between time in range and hemoglobin A1c estimated from continuous glucose monitoring: A preliminary study.血糖变异性改变了基于连续血糖监测的血糖控制时间与糖化血红蛋白之间的关系:一项初步研究。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020 Mar;161:108032. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108032. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
5
6. Glycemic Targets: .6. 血糖目标: 。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(Suppl 1):S66-S76. doi: 10.2337/dc20-S006.
6
2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: .2. 糖尿病的分类和诊断: 。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(Suppl 1):S14-S31. doi: 10.2337/dc20-S002.
7
Quality of Life and Glucose Control After 1 Year of Nationwide Reimbursement of Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults Living With Type 1 Diabetes (FUTURE): A Prospective Observational Real-World Cohort Study.1 型糖尿病患者接受间歇性扫描连续血糖监测 1 年后的生活质量和血糖控制(FUTURE):一项前瞻性观察性真实世界队列研究。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Feb;43(2):389-397. doi: 10.2337/dc19-1610. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
8
Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9 edition.2019 年全球及各区域糖尿病患病率估算值及 2030 年和 2045 年预测值:国际糖尿病联盟糖尿病地图集(第 9 版)的结果。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019 Nov;157:107843. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107843. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
9
Marked improvement in HbA following commencement of flash glucose monitoring in people with type 1 diabetes.糖化血红蛋白在 1 型糖尿病患者开始使用瞬感葡萄糖监测后显著改善。
Diabetologia. 2019 Aug;62(8):1349-1356. doi: 10.1007/s00125-019-4894-1. Epub 2019 Jun 9.
10
Clinical Targets for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Interpretation: Recommendations From the International Consensus on Time in Range.临床连续血糖监测数据解读目标:时间范围国际共识推荐意见。
Diabetes Care. 2019 Aug;42(8):1593-1603. doi: 10.2337/dci19-0028. Epub 2019 Jun 8.