Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences.
Psychol Aging. 2020 Aug;35(5):663-675. doi: 10.1037/pag0000371.
Recent evidence indicates that older adults' decreased ability to inhibit irrelevant information may lead to increased processing and greater memory for distractor information compared with younger adults. The present experiments examine the generality of this finding in a series of Stroop studies. In Experiment 1, participants studied a list of words then received a Stroop color naming task, with to-be-remembered words embedded within the Stroop task. Although there was evidence of a disproportionate age-related Stroop effect, there was no evidence of an age difference in episodic recognition memory for words from the Stroop task. Experiment 2 extended this paradigm to a more implicit demasking task. Again, there was evidence of an age-related disproportionate Stroop effect, however, there were no differences in memory for unattended words in demasking performance. Experiment 3 was a direct replication of a previous study which reported age differences in the influence of unattended words, via implicit priming in a general knowledge test. The results did not replicate the original study such that younger adults showed slightly more priming from distractors than older adults. The results provide converging evidence that although older adults have more difficulty inhibiting irrelevant information in the Stroop task, distractor information does not seem to disproportionately influence later memory for older adults compared with younger adults. These studies suggest that it is critical to consider the locus of memory encoding in distractor tasks to better understand the relationship between inhibitory processes during the distractor task and later memory performance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
最近的证据表明,与年轻人相比,老年人抑制无关信息的能力下降,可能导致他们对分心信息的处理和记忆增加。本系列 Stroop 研究实验检验了这一发现的普遍性。在实验 1 中,参与者学习了一系列单词,然后接受 Stroop 颜色命名任务,要记住的单词嵌入在 Stroop 任务中。尽管有证据表明年龄相关的 Stroop 效应不成比例,但在 Stroop 任务中对单词的情节记忆识别没有年龄差异的证据。实验 2 将这一范式扩展到更隐式的去掩蔽任务。同样,有证据表明年龄相关的不成比例的 Stroop 效应,然而,在去掩蔽表现中,对未注意单词的记忆没有差异。实验 3 是对之前一项研究的直接复制,该研究报告了在一般知识测试中的隐式启动中,未注意单词对年轻人和老年人的影响存在年龄差异。结果并没有复制原始研究,即年轻人比老年人从分心词中获得的启动略多。这些结果提供了一致的证据,尽管老年人在 Stroop 任务中抑制无关信息的能力较差,但与年轻人相比,分心信息似乎不会不成比例地影响老年人的后续记忆。这些研究表明,在分心任务中考虑记忆编码的位置对于更好地理解分心任务期间的抑制过程与后续记忆表现之间的关系至关重要。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。