Ileri-Tayar Merve, Bugg Julie M, Dudey Thomas, Braver Todd S
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2025 Aug 25. doi: 10.1037/xge0001824.
We provide a comprehensive investigation of proactive and reactive control during Stroop task performance with younger, middle-aged, and older adults to test predictions of the dual mechanisms of control framework. A novel color-word vocal response paradigm was utilized with separate proactive, baseline, and reactive conditions, which differed in list-wide and item-specific proportion congruencies, along with matched and randomly alternating color naming and word reading blocks. When compared to baseline, the proactive condition indexes processes that actively maintain goal-relevant information during contexts in which distraction is expected, while the reactive condition indexes dynamic adjustment processes engaged when items associated with high cognitive control demands are unpredictably encountered. Using a large sample ( = 327) and targeted analyses measuring primary and secondary behavioral markers of proactive and reactive control, the findings strongly indicate that while younger adults demonstrate robust engagement of proactive control mechanisms, proactive control effects were absent in older adults and diminished in middle-aged adults, suggesting a lifespan-related pattern of change. In contrast, the findings highlight the selectivity of the proactive pattern, as indices of reactive control did not exhibit age-related change, nor were there any effects of proportion congruency in matched word reading blocks. Together, these findings provide strong confirmation of the dual mechanisms of control framework in suggesting a tight linkage between proactive control capacity and the dynamic neurocognitive processes that change across the adult lifespan. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
我们对年轻人、中年人和老年人在执行斯特鲁普任务期间的主动控制和反应控制进行了全面调查,以检验控制框架双重机制的预测。我们采用了一种新颖的颜色-单词发声反应范式,包括单独的主动、基线和反应条件,这些条件在列表范围和项目特定的一致性比例上有所不同,同时还有匹配的和随机交替的颜色命名和单词阅读块。与基线相比,主动条件指标反映的是在预期会出现干扰的情境中积极维持与目标相关信息的过程,而反应条件指标反映的是在意外遇到与高认知控制需求相关的项目时所参与的动态调整过程。通过使用一个大样本(N = 327)并进行针对性分析,测量主动控制和反应控制的主要和次要行为标记,研究结果有力地表明,虽然年轻人表现出强大的主动控制机制参与度,但老年人不存在主动控制效应,中年人则有所减弱,这表明存在与年龄相关的变化模式。相比之下,研究结果突出了主动模式的选择性,因为反应控制指标没有表现出与年龄相关的变化,在匹配的单词阅读块中也没有一致性比例的影响。总之,这些发现有力地证实了控制框架的双重机制,表明主动控制能力与在成年期发生变化的动态神经认知过程之间存在紧密联系。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2025美国心理学会,保留所有权利)