School of Psychology, University of Nottingham.
School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St. Andrews.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 May;45(5):553-572. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000608. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
Interference-control is the ability to exclude distractions and focus on a specific task or stimulus. However, it is currently unclear whether the same interference-control mechanisms underlie the ability to ignore unimodal and cross-modal distractions. In 2 experiments we assessed whether unimodal and cross-modal interference follow similar trajectories in development and aging and occur at similar processing levels. In Experiment 1, 42 children (6-11 years), 31 younger adults (18-25 years) and 32 older adults (60-84 years) identified color rectangles with either written (unimodal) or spoken (cross-modal) distractor-words. Stimuli could be congruent, incongruent but mapped to the same response (stimulus-incongruent), or incongruent and mapped to different responses (response-incongruent); thus, separating interference occurring at early (sensory) and late (response) processing levels. Unimodal interference was worst in childhood and old age; however, older adults maintained the ability to ignore cross-modal distraction. Unimodal but not cross-modal response-interference also reduced accuracy. In Experiment 2 we compared the effect of audition on vision and vice versa in 52 children (6-11 years), 30 young adults (22-33 years) and 30 older adults (60-84 years). As in Experiment 1, older adults maintained the ability to ignore cross-modal distraction arising from either modality, and neither type of cross-modal distraction limited accuracy in adults. However, cross-modal distraction still reduced accuracy in children and children were more slowed by stimulus-interference compared with adults. We conclude that; unimodal and cross-modal interference follow different life span trajectories and differences in stimulus- and response-interference may increase cross-modal distractibility in childhood. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
干扰控制是指排除干扰并专注于特定任务或刺激的能力。然而,目前尚不清楚相同的干扰控制机制是否是忽略单模态和跨模态干扰的基础。在 2 项实验中,我们评估了单模态和跨模态干扰在发展和衰老过程中是否遵循相似的轨迹,以及它们是否发生在相似的加工水平上。在实验 1 中,我们让 42 名儿童(6-11 岁)、31 名年轻成年人(18-25 岁)和 32 名老年人(60-84 岁)识别带有书面(单模态)或口头(跨模态)干扰词的彩色矩形。刺激可以是一致的、不一致但映射到相同反应的(刺激不一致),或者不一致且映射到不同反应的(反应不一致);因此,将早期(感觉)和晚期(反应)加工水平的干扰分开。单模态干扰在儿童期和老年期最严重;然而,老年人仍然能够忽略跨模态干扰。单模态但不是跨模态的反应干扰也会降低准确性。在实验 2 中,我们在 52 名儿童(6-11 岁)、30 名年轻成年人(22-33 岁)和 30 名老年人(60-84 岁)中比较了听觉对视觉的影响以及反之亦然。与实验 1 一样,老年人仍然能够忽略来自任一模态的跨模态干扰,并且成人不受任何类型的跨模态干扰的限制。然而,跨模态干扰仍然会降低儿童的准确性,并且与成人相比,儿童受到刺激干扰的影响更大。我们的结论是:单模态和跨模态干扰遵循不同的生命轨迹,刺激和反应干扰的差异可能会增加儿童的跨模态易分散性。