• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

农业安全与健康素养工具的开发与验证

Development and Validation of an Agricultural Safety and Health Literacy Tool.

作者信息

Lee Gyeong-Ye, Park Ki-Soo

机构信息

Department of Preventive Medicine, Institute of Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Republic of Korea.

Department of Bio & Medical Big Data, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Jul 17;18:4059-4070. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S528979. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S528979
PMID:40693168
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12278981/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health literacy in the workplace plays a crucial role in preventing work-related diseases and injuries. This study aims to develop and validate an instrument to measure Agricultural Safety and Health Literacy (ASHL) based on existing occupational health literacy tools.

METHODS

The development of the instrument involved preliminary item development, expert evaluation, and preliminary testing. Cronbach's α, a coefficient that measures the internal consistency of each item, was measured for reliability. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were performed to examine the construct validity, and predictive validity was evaluated using paired -tests for changes in health literacy before and after education.

RESULTS

The overall Cronbach's α for the instrument was 0.92, indicating high reliability. In the exploratory factor analysis, five factors were extracted explaining 64.4% of the total variance. As a result of confirmatory factor analysis, the goodness-of-fit index (GFI) was shown as GFI=0.851, adjusted GFI=0.816, comparative fit index=0.901, normed fit index=0.835, root mean square error of approximation=0.071, and χ/df=2.2. These results indicated acceptable model fit. The change in score from before to after the educational intervention was confirmed to have predictive validity with a significant increase in all areas (p<0.005).

CONCLUSION

This study describes the development of an instrument for understanding ASHL for use in evaluating the health and safety of farmers. The developed instrument will be used in Korea to improve the health behavior of farmers and to prevent and manage various health problems that may occur in the agricultural working environment.

摘要

背景

职场健康素养在预防与工作相关的疾病和伤害方面起着至关重要的作用。本研究旨在基于现有的职业健康素养工具,开发并验证一种用于测量农业安全与健康素养(ASHL)的工具。

方法

该工具的开发包括初步项目开发、专家评估和初步测试。通过测量Cronbach's α系数(一种衡量每个项目内部一致性的系数)来评估可靠性。进行探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析以检验结构效度,并使用配对检验评估教育前后健康素养变化的预测效度。

结果

该工具的总体Cronbach's α为0.92,表明可靠性高。在探索性因素分析中,提取了五个因素,解释了总方差的64.4%。验证性因素分析的结果显示,拟合优度指数(GFI)为GFI = 0.851,调整后GFI = 0.816,比较拟合指数 = 0.901,规范拟合指数 = 0.835,近似均方根误差 = 0.071,χ/df = 2.2。这些结果表明模型拟合可接受。教育干预前后分数的变化被证实具有预测效度,所有领域均有显著增加(p < 0.005)。

结论

本研究描述了一种用于理解ASHL的工具的开发,该工具可用于评估农民的健康和安全。所开发的工具将在韩国用于改善农民的健康行为,并预防和管理农业工作环境中可能出现的各种健康问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d70/12278981/77580275a96c/JMDH-18-4059-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d70/12278981/c6170975fd5b/JMDH-18-4059-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d70/12278981/77580275a96c/JMDH-18-4059-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d70/12278981/c6170975fd5b/JMDH-18-4059-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d70/12278981/77580275a96c/JMDH-18-4059-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of an Agricultural Safety and Health Literacy Tool.农业安全与健康素养工具的开发与验证
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Jul 17;18:4059-4070. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S528979. eCollection 2025.
2
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
3
Development and Preliminary Evaluation of a Food Literacy Measure for Use With Young People in Canada.加拿大青少年食品素养测量方法的开发与初步评估
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2025 Jul;125(7):1009-1023. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2024.10.021. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
4
Development of a Pesticide Labeling Literacy Scale for Thai Rice Farmers: Item Generation and Content Validity Testing.泰国稻农农药标签识字量表的开发:条目生成与内容效度测试
J Agromedicine. 2025 Jul;30(3):603-615. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2025.2468416. Epub 2025 Mar 10.
5
Development and validation of Mental Health Literacy Assessment Scale among community health workers in Nepal.尼泊尔社区卫生工作者心理健康素养评估量表的编制与验证
SAGE Open Med. 2025 Jun 14;13:20503121251341423. doi: 10.1177/20503121251341423. eCollection 2025.
6
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
7
Turkish Version of the Sense of Belonging in Nursing School Scale: Validity and Reliability for Nursing Students.护理学校归属感量表的土耳其语版本:护理专业学生的效度与信度
J Nurs Meas. 2025 Jul 14;33(2):188-197. doi: 10.1891/JNM-2023-0118.
8
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
9
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
10
Is It Possible to Develop a Patient-reported Experience Measure With Lower Ceiling Effect?是否有可能开发一种天花板效应较低的患者报告体验测量方法?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):693-703. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003262. Epub 2024 Oct 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Occupational health literacy and work ability: a moderation analysis including interpersonal and organizational factors in healthy organizations.职业健康素养与工作能力:健康组织中人际关系和组织因素的调节分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 7;12:1243138. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1243138. eCollection 2024.
2
Health literacy at work - individual and organizational health literacy, health supporting leadership and employee wellbeing.工作场所健康素养——个体和组织健康素养、健康支持型领导力与员工福祉。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jul 6;23(1):736. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09766-0.
3
Association of length of service and job category with occupational health literacy of port employees in Shenzhen, China.
工龄和职业类别与中国深圳港口员工职业健康素养的关系。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jun 23;23(1):1223. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15769-7.
4
Occupational Health Literacy Scale (OHLS): development and validation of a domain-specific measuring instrument.职业健康素养量表(OHLS):一种特定领域测量工具的开发与验证
Health Promot Int. 2023 Feb 1;38(1). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daac182.
5
Work-Related Health Literacy: A Scoping Review to Clarify the Concept.工作相关健康素养:概念澄清的范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 22;18(19):9945. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18199945.
6
Scale Development and Validation to Measure Occupational Health Literacy Among Thai Informal Workers.用于测量泰国非正规工人职业健康素养的量表开发与验证
Saf Health Work. 2020 Dec;11(4):526-532. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.06.003. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
7
Associations between health-related skills and young adults' work ability within a structural health literacy model.健康相关技能与结构健康素养模型中青年工作能力的相关性。
Health Promot Int. 2021 Aug 30;36(4):1072-1083. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaa099.
8
Perceived professional preparedness of senior nursing students' questionnaire: Development and psychometric evaluation.护理专业高年级学生感知专业准备情况问卷:编制与心理测量学评价。
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Oct;93:104533. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104533. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
9
The Relationship between Health Literacy, Quality of Life, and Subjective Health: Results of a Cross-Sectional Study in a Rural Region in Germany.健康素养、生活质量和主观健康之间的关系:德国农村地区一项横断面研究的结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 5;17(5):1683. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051683.
10
Emotional Labor: Scale Development and Validation in the Chinese Context.情绪劳动:中国背景下的量表编制与验证
Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 18;10:2095. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02095. eCollection 2019.