• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于机器学习的模型用于改善1型糖尿病治疗中的胰岛素大剂量计算

Machine-Learning Based Model to Improve Insulin Bolus Calculation in Type 1 Diabetes Therapy.

作者信息

Noaro Giulia, Cappon Giacomo, Vettoretti Martina, Sparacino Giovanni, Favero Simone Del, Facchinetti Andrea

出版信息

IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2021 Jan;68(1):247-255. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2020.3004031. Epub 2020 Dec 21.

DOI:10.1109/TBME.2020.3004031
PMID:32746033
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This paper aims at proposing a new machine-learning based model to improve the calculation of mealtime insulin boluses (MIB) in type 1 diabetes (T1D) therapy using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data. Indeed, MIB is still often computed through the standard formula (SF), which does not account for glucose rate-of-change ( ∆G), causing critical hypo/hyperglycemic episodes.

METHODS

Four candidate models for MIB calculation, based on multiple linear regression (MLR) and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) are developed. The proposed models are assessed in silico, using the UVa/Padova T1D simulator, in different mealtime scenarios and compared to the SF and three ∆G-accounting variants proposed in the literature. An assessment on real data, by retrospectively analyzing 218 glycemic traces, is also performed.

RESULTS

All four tested models performed better than the existing techniques. LASSO regression with extended feature-set including quadratic terms (LASSO ) produced the best results. In silico, LASSO reduced the error in estimating the optimal bolus to only 0.86 U (1.45 U of SF and 1.36-1.44 U of literature methods), as well as hypoglycemia incidence (from 44.41% of SF and 44.60-45.01% of literature methods, to 35.93%). Results are confirmed by the retrospective application to real data.

CONCLUSION

New models to improve MIB calculation accounting for CGM- ∆G and easy-to-measure features can be developed within a machine learning framework. Particularly, in this paper, a new LASSO model was developed, which ensures better glycemic control than SF and other literature methods.

SIGNIFICANCE

MIB dosage with the proposed LASSO model can potentially reduce the risk of adverse events in T1D therapy.

摘要

目的

本文旨在提出一种基于机器学习的新模型,以利用连续血糖监测(CGM)数据改进1型糖尿病(T1D)治疗中餐时胰岛素大剂量(MIB)的计算。实际上,MIB目前仍常通过标准公式(SF)计算,该公式未考虑血糖变化率(∆G),会导致严重的低血糖/高血糖事件。

方法

开发了基于多元线性回归(MLR)和最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)的四种用于MIB计算的候选模型。使用弗吉尼亚大学/帕多瓦T1D模拟器,在不同用餐场景下对所提出的模型进行计算机模拟评估,并与SF以及文献中提出的三种考虑∆G的变体进行比较。还通过回顾性分析218条血糖轨迹对真实数据进行了评估。

结果

所有四个测试模型的表现均优于现有技术。包含二次项的扩展特征集的LASSO回归(LASSO )产生了最佳结果。在计算机模拟中,LASSO 将估计最佳大剂量的误差降低至仅0.86单位(SF为1.45单位,文献方法为1.36 - 1.44单位),同时降低了低血糖发生率(从SF的44.41%和文献方法的44.60 - 45.01%降至35.93%)。对真实数据的回顾性应用证实了这些结果。

结论

可以在机器学习框架内开发考虑CGM - ∆G和易于测量特征的改进MIB计算的新模型。特别是,本文开发了一种新的LASSO 模型,与SF和其他文献方法相比,该模型可确保更好的血糖控制。

意义

使用所提出的LASSO 模型进行MIB给药可能会降低T1D治疗中不良事件的风险。

相似文献

1
Machine-Learning Based Model to Improve Insulin Bolus Calculation in Type 1 Diabetes Therapy.基于机器学习的模型用于改善1型糖尿病治疗中的胰岛素大剂量计算
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2021 Jan;68(1):247-255. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2020.3004031. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
2
Nonlinear Machine Learning Models for Insulin Bolus Estimation in Type 1 Diabetes Therapy.用于1型糖尿病治疗中胰岛素推注估计的非线性机器学习模型
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2020 Jul;2020:5502-5505. doi: 10.1109/EMBC44109.2020.9176021.
3
Methods for Insulin Bolus Adjustment Based on the Continuous Glucose Monitoring Trend Arrows in Type 1 Diabetes: Performance and Safety Assessment in an In Silico Clinical Trial.基于 1 型糖尿病连续血糖监测趋势箭头的胰岛素推注调整方法:一项模拟临床研究中的性能和安全性评估。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Jan;17(1):107-116. doi: 10.1177/19322968211043162. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
4
In Silico Assessment of Literature Insulin Bolus Calculation Methods Accounting for Glucose Rate of Change.考虑葡萄糖变化率的文献中胰岛素大剂量计算方法的计算机模拟评估
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019 Jan;13(1):103-110. doi: 10.1177/1932296818777524. Epub 2018 May 31.
5
A Personalized and Adaptive Insulin Bolus Calculator Based on Double Deep Q- Learning to Improve Type 1 Diabetes Management.基于双深度 Q 学习的个性化和自适应胰岛素推注计算器,改善 1 型糖尿病管理。
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2023 May;27(5):2536-2544. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2023.3249571. Epub 2023 May 4.
6
Type-1 Diabetes Patient Decision Simulator for In Silico Testing Safety and Effectiveness of Insulin Treatments.1 型糖尿病患者决策模拟器,用于模拟胰岛素治疗的安全性和有效性。
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2018 Jun;65(6):1281-1290. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2017.2746340. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
7
A Neural-Network-Based Approach to Personalize Insulin Bolus Calculation Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring.一种基于神经网络的方法,利用连续血糖监测实现个性化胰岛素推注计算。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 Mar;12(2):265-272. doi: 10.1177/1932296818759558.
8
Continuous Glucose Monitors and Activity Trackers to Inform Insulin Dosing in Type 1 Diabetes: The University of Virginia Contribution.连续血糖监测仪和活动追踪器在 1 型糖尿病胰岛素剂量调整中的应用:弗吉尼亚大学的贡献。
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Dec 6;19(24):5386. doi: 10.3390/s19245386.
9
Optimal Insulin Bolus Dosing in Type 1 Diabetes Management: Neural Network Approach Exploiting CGM Sensor Information.1型糖尿病管理中的最佳胰岛素大剂量给药:利用连续血糖监测(CGM)传感器信息的神经网络方法
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2018 Jul;2018:1-4. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2018.8512250.
10
Insulin Sensitivity Index-Based Optimization of Insulin to Carbohydrate Ratio: In Silico Study Shows Efficacious Protection Against Hypoglycemic Events Caused by Suboptimal Therapy.基于胰岛素敏感性指数的胰岛素与碳水化合物比值优化:模拟研究表明,针对治疗不足引起的低血糖事件具有有效的保护作用。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 Feb;20(2):98-105. doi: 10.1089/dia.2017.0248.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital Twins in Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Review.1型糖尿病中的数字孪生:一项系统综述
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Jun 17:19322968241262112. doi: 10.1177/19322968241262112.
2
Developing the UVA/Padova Type 1 Diabetes Simulator: Modeling, Validation, Refinements, and Utility.开发 UVA/Padova 1 型糖尿病模拟器:建模、验证、改进和应用。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Nov;17(6):1493-1505. doi: 10.1177/19322968231195081. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
3
Recent applications of machine learning and deep learning models in the prediction, diagnosis, and management of diabetes: a comprehensive review.
机器学习和深度学习模型在糖尿病预测、诊断及管理中的最新应用:一项全面综述
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2022 Dec 27;14(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s13098-022-00969-9.
4
Diabetes Technology Meeting 2021.2021 年糖尿病技术会议。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 Jul;16(4):1016-1056. doi: 10.1177/19322968221090279. Epub 2022 May 2.
5
Appositeness of Optimized and Reliable Machine Learning for Healthcare: A Survey.优化且可靠的机器学习在医疗保健中的适用性:一项综述。
Arch Comput Methods Eng. 2022;29(6):3981-4003. doi: 10.1007/s11831-022-09733-8. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
6
Mixed-Weight Neural Bagging for Detecting mA Modifications in SARS-CoV-2 RNA Sequencing.基于混合权重神经袋的 SARS-CoV-2 测序 RNA 中 mA 修饰检测方法。
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2022 Aug;69(8):2557-2568. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2022.3150420. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
7
Machine learning for initial insulin estimation in hospitalized patients.机器学习在住院患者初始胰岛素估算中的应用。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Sep 18;28(10):2212-2219. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab099.
8
Machine Learning Techniques for Hypoglycemia Prediction: Trends and Challenges.机器学习在低血糖预测中的应用:趋势与挑战。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jan 14;21(2):546. doi: 10.3390/s21020546.
9
Advanced Diabetes Management Using Artificial Intelligence and Continuous Glucose Monitoring Sensors.人工智能和连续血糖监测传感器在糖尿病管理中的应用。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jul 10;20(14):3870. doi: 10.3390/s20143870.