Suppr超能文献

[宫颈/阴道液基细胞学假阴性诊断的影响因素分析]

[Analysis of factors influencing the false-negative diagnosis of cervical/vaginal liquid based cytology].

作者信息

Ma D Y, Dong Y, Feng H, Wang T T, Zhao J

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China.

Department of Pathology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Aug 8;49(8):806-811. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112151-20200106-00013.

Abstract

To investigate the possible influencing factors of false-negative diagnosis of cervical/vaginal liquid based cytology, and further improve the sensitivity of cervical/vaginal cytology. The results of cervical/vaginal cytology of outpatients and inpatients in Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital from July 2015 to December 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. Cytological false-negative cases were defined as the patients whose cytological results showed no intraepithelial neoplasia and malignant (NILM), but whose biopsy was diagnosed as cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 or vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VAIN) 2 or above within 6 months of the diagnosis. The review of false-negative cytology smear was completed by two senior cytologists. Two-class logistic regression was used to evaluate the influence of age, location or number of lesion, and degree of lesion on the false-negative diagnosis of cytology. The reasons for the inconsistency of false-negative diagnosis were analyzed with the review results. Among 1 009 cases of CIN2+ and VAIN2+ lesions, 180 cases (17.8%) showed NILM. After reviewing the smear, 123 cases (68.3%) were identified as NILM and 57 cases(31.7%) as abnormal. The false-negative rate was the highest (20.8%) in the patients with age≤30 years, and the risk was 8.85 times higher than the patients aged 31 to 60 years (0.001), 9.26 times than the patients aged≥60 years (0.001). The highest cytological false-negative rate was 50.0% for cervical polyps or intraductal lesions. The false-negative rate of vaginal wall or vaginal pedicle rupture was 13.0%; that of single cervical lesion was 22.3%; that of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion(HSIL) and adenocarcinoma in situ of cervix(AIS) was 13.7% and that of malignant lesions was 3.9%. The most common cell types in the reviewed abnormal cases were squamous cells in the middle surface layer (38.6%) and squamous cells in the outer bottom layer (24.6%). The abnormal cells in all smears was the most common distribution (59.7%), the number of abnormal cells in the smear was less than 10 (31.6%), nuclear enlargement and light staining were common (42.2%), and inflammatory lesions or keratotic changes in the background were most common (59.7%). Age of the patient, location or number of lesion, and degree of lesion are associated with false-negative diagnosis of cytology. Summarizing sampling experience and improving sampling skills will help reduce the occurrence of false-negative cases. Cytopathologists should examine slightly abnormal changes more carefully and learn how to further reduce the false-negative rate procactively.

摘要

为探讨宫颈/阴道液基细胞学假阴性诊断的可能影响因素,进一步提高宫颈/阴道细胞学的敏感性。回顾性分析北京大学第一医院妇产科2015年7月至2018年12月门诊及住院患者的宫颈/阴道细胞学检查结果。细胞学假阴性病例定义为细胞学结果显示无上皮内瘤变及恶性病变(NILM),但活检在诊断后6个月内被诊断为宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)2级或阴道上皮内瘤变(VAIN)2级及以上的患者。由两位资深细胞病理学家完成对假阴性细胞学涂片的复查。采用二分类逻辑回归评估年龄、病变部位或数量以及病变程度对细胞学假阴性诊断的影响。结合复查结果分析假阴性诊断不一致的原因。在1009例CIN2 +和VAIN2 +病变中,180例(17.8%)显示为NILM。复查涂片后,123例(68.3%)被确定为NILM,57例(31.7%)为异常。年龄≤30岁的患者假阴性率最高(20.8%),其风险比31至60岁的患者高8.85倍(P = 0.001),比≥60岁的患者高9.26倍(P = 0.001)。宫颈息肉或导管内病变的细胞学假阴性率最高,为50.0%。阴道壁或阴道蒂破裂的假阴性率为13.0%;单个宫颈病变的假阴性率为22.3%;高级别鳞状上皮内病变(HSIL)和宫颈原位腺癌(AIS)的假阴性率分别为13.7%和3.9%。复查异常病例中最常见的细胞类型是中层表层鳞状细胞(38.6%)和外底层鳞状细胞(24.6%)。所有涂片中异常细胞呈最常见分布(59.7%),涂片中异常细胞数量少于10个(31.6%),细胞核增大及淡染常见(42.2%),背景中炎症病变或角化改变最常见(59.7%)。患者年龄、病变部位或数量以及病变程度与细胞学假阴性诊断相关。总结取材经验并提高取材技巧有助于减少假阴性病例的发生。细胞病理学家应更仔细地检查轻微异常变化,并主动学习如何进一步降低假阴性率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验