Suppr超能文献

研究经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对视觉方向辨别任务表现的影响:“安慰剂的可能影响”

Investigating the effects of tDCS on Visual Orientation Discrimination Task Performance: 'The possible influence of placebo'.

作者信息

BinDawood A, Dickinson A, Aytemur A, Howarth C, Milne E, Jones M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Cathedral Court, 1 Vicar Lane, Sheffield UK, S1 2LT.

Department of Psychology, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

J Cogn Enhanc. 2020 Sep;4(3):235-249. doi: 10.1007/s41465-019-00154-3. Epub 2019 Nov 9.

Abstract

The non-invasive neuromodulation technique tDCS offers the promise of a low cost tool for both research and clinical applications in psychology, psychiatry and neuroscience. However, findings regarding its efficacy are often equivocal. A key issue is that the clinical and cognitive applications studied are often complex and thus effects of tDCS are difficult to predict given its known effects on the basic underlying neurophysiology, namely alterations in cortical inhibition-excitation balance. As such, it may be beneficial to assess the effects of tDCS in tasks whose performance has a clear link to cortical inhibition-excitation balance such as the visual orientation discrimination task (ODT). In prior studies in our laboratory no practise effects were found during 2 consecutive runs of the ODT, thus in the current investigation, to examine the effects of tDCS, subjects received 10 minutes of 2mA occipital tDCS (sham, anode, cathode) between a first and second run of ODT. Surprisingly, subjects' performance significantly improved in the second run of ODT compared to the first one regardless of the tDCS stimulation type they received (anodal, cathodal, or sham-tDCS). Possible causes for such an improvement could have been due to either a generic 'placebo' effect of tDCS (as all subjects received some form of tDCS) or an increased delay period between the two runs of ODT of the current study compared to our previous work (10 minutes duration required to administer tDCS as opposed to ~2 minutes in previous studies as a 'break'). As such, we tested these two possibilities with a subsequent experiment in which subjects received 2 minutes or 10 minutes delay between the 2 runs (with no tDCS) or 10 minutes of sham-tDCS. Only sham-tDCS resulted in improved performance thus these data add to a growing literature suggesting that tDCS has powerful placebo effect that may occur even in the absence of active cortical modulation.

摘要

非侵入性神经调节技术经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)有望成为一种低成本工具,用于心理学、精神病学和神经科学的研究及临床应用。然而,关于其疗效的研究结果往往并不明确。一个关键问题是,所研究的临床和认知应用通常较为复杂,因此鉴于tDCS对基本潜在神经生理学的已知影响,即皮质抑制 - 兴奋平衡的改变,其效果难以预测。因此,在诸如视觉方向辨别任务(ODT)等表现与皮质抑制 - 兴奋平衡有明确关联的任务中评估tDCS的效果可能会有所帮助。在我们实验室之前的研究中,连续两次进行ODT时未发现练习效应,因此在当前研究中,为了检验tDCS的效果,受试者在第一次和第二次ODT之间接受了10分钟的2mA枕部tDCS(假刺激、阳极刺激、阴极刺激)。令人惊讶的是,与第一次相比,无论受试者接受何种tDCS刺激类型(阳极、阴极或假tDCS),他们在第二次ODT中的表现都显著提高。这种改善的可能原因可能是tDCS的一般“安慰剂”效应(因为所有受试者都接受了某种形式的tDCS),或者是与我们之前的研究相比,本研究中两次ODT之间的延迟时间增加了(施用tDCS需要10分钟,而之前的研究中作为“休息”时间约为2分钟)。因此,我们通过后续实验测试了这两种可能性,在该实验中,受试者在两次测试之间接受2分钟或10分钟的延迟(无tDCS)或10分钟的假tDCS。只有假tDCS导致表现改善,因此这些数据进一步丰富了现有文献,表明tDCS具有强大的安慰剂效应,即使在没有主动皮质调制的情况下也可能发生。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

5
Non-invasive brain stimulation and neuroenhancement.非侵入性脑刺激与神经增强
Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2022 May 25;7:146-165. doi: 10.1016/j.cnp.2022.05.002. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

2
A Rapid Form of Offline Consolidation in Skill Learning.技能学习中的快速离线巩固形式。
Curr Biol. 2019 Apr 22;29(8):1346-1351.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.02.049. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
8
Physiology of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.经颅直流电刺激的生理学
J ECT. 2018 Sep;34(3):144-152. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000510.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验