1Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
2Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Moshi, Tanzania.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Oct;103(4):1670-1680. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0029.
Uncertainty about the causes of death (COD) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has been recognized as a constraint to global health and development. Although complete diagnostic autopsy (CDA) is the best way to assess COD, it is uncommon in LMICs because of low investment priority and assumptions about poor acceptability. Social science research was conducted from May 2016 through July 2017 to examine issues related to acceptability of CDAs in northern Tanzania where autopsy was being offered in two referral hospitals to assess COD associated with febrile illness. Initial formative research entailed 29 key informant interviews, seven observations of burial practices, and four group discussions. In-depth interviews were conducted with families of deceased, including nine families that accepted and 11 families that refused CDA. The formative research identified concepts related to death, understandings of CDA, and cultural practices and psychosocial considerations associated with death that informed the authorization process. Most families who accepted CDA cited the desire to get clarity regarding the COD as a primary reason for acceptance. An unexpected finding was that CDA is perceived as a means to determine witchcraft involvement, a common explanation for COD and a common reason for postmortem acceptance. Death resulting from chronic illness or conditions presumed to have a clinical diagnosis were reasons for CDA to be viewed as unnecessary. The timing, way families were approached, and content of information shared during authorization influenced acceptance and refusal of CDA. Findings show that CDAs can be acceptable in settings where traditional disease models prevail.
在中低收入国家(LMICs),对死亡原因(COD)的不确定一直被认为是对全球健康和发展的制约因素。虽然完全诊断性尸检(CDA)是评估 COD 的最佳方法,但由于投资优先级较低以及对接受度较差的假设,在 LMICs 中并不常见。社会科学研究于 2016 年 5 月至 2017 年 7 月进行,旨在研究坦桑尼亚北部接受 CDA 的相关问题,在那里,两家转诊医院提供尸检以评估与发热疾病相关的 COD。初始形成性研究包括 29 次关键知情人访谈、7 次丧葬习俗观察和 4 次小组讨论。对死者家属进行了深入访谈,包括接受和拒绝 CDA 的 9 个家庭和 11 个家庭。形成性研究确定了与死亡相关的概念、对 CDA 的理解以及与死亡相关的文化习俗和心理社会考虑因素,这些因素为授权过程提供了信息。大多数接受 CDA 的家庭将明确 COD 作为接受的主要原因。一个意外的发现是,CDA 被视为确定巫术参与的一种手段,巫术参与是 COD 的常见解释,也是死后接受的常见原因。因慢性病或被认为有临床诊断的疾病而导致的死亡是进行 CDA 的理由。授权过程中的时间、家庭被接触的方式以及共享信息的内容都会影响 CDA 的接受和拒绝。研究结果表明,在传统疾病模式盛行的情况下,CDA 是可以接受的。