Emara Aalaa, Sharma Neha, Halbeisen Florian S, Msallem Bilal, Thieringer Florian M
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo 12613, Egypt.
Department of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Dent J (Basel). 2020 Aug 2;8(3):79. doi: 10.3390/dj8030079.
Rapidly developing digital dental technologies have substantially simplified the documentation of plaster dental models. The large variety of available scanners with varying degrees of accuracy and cost, however, makes the purchase decision difficult. This study assessed the digitization accuracy of a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and an intraoral scanner (IOS), as compared to a desktop optical scanner (OS). Ten plaster dental models were digitized three times (n = 30) with each scanner. The generated STL files were cross-compared, and the RMS values were calculated. Conclusions were drawn about the accuracy with respect to precision and trueness levels. The precision of the CBCT scanner was similar to the desktop OS reference, which both had a median deviation of 0.04 mm. The IOS had statistically significantly higher deviation compared to the reference OS, with a median deviation of 0.18 mm. The trueness values of the CBCT was also better than that of IOS-median differences of 0.14 and 0.17 mm, respectively. We conclude that the tested CBCT scanner is a highly accurate and user-friendly scanner for model digitization, and therefore a valuable alternative to the OS. The tested IOS was generally of lower accuracy, but it can still be used for plaster dental model digitization.
快速发展的数字牙科技术极大地简化了石膏牙模的记录。然而,市面上各种精度和成本各异的扫描仪,使得购买决策变得困难。本研究评估了锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)和口腔内扫描仪(IOS)与台式光学扫描仪(OS)相比的数字化精度。使用每种扫描仪对十个石膏牙模进行三次数字化(n = 30)。对生成的STL文件进行交叉比较,并计算均方根(RMS)值。得出了关于精度和真实度水平方面准确性的结论。CBCT扫描仪的精度与台式OS参考相似,两者的中位数偏差均为0.04毫米。与参考OS相比,IOS的偏差在统计学上显著更高,中位数偏差为0.18毫米。CBCT的真实度值也优于IOS,中位数差异分别为0.14和0.17毫米。我们得出结论,所测试的CBCT扫描仪是一种用于模型数字化的高精度且用户友好的扫描仪,因此是OS的一个有价值的替代方案。所测试的IOS总体精度较低,但仍可用于石膏牙模数字化。