• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外倒转术(ECV)后阴道分娩成功:从 ECV 到分娩的时间间隔有影响吗?一项多中心研究。

Successful vaginal delivery after external cephalic version (ECV): does time interval from ECV to delivery make a difference? A multicenter study.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, 52621, Ramat Gan, Israel.

Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Dec;302(6):1361-1367. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05733-w. Epub 2020 Aug 4.

DOI:10.1007/s00404-020-05733-w
PMID:32749534
Abstract

PURPOSE

The risk of cesarean delivery after a successful external cephalic version for breech presentation is higher as compared with fetuses in cephalic presentation. However, the role of the time interval between version attempt to delivery on the risk for cesarean delivery is unclear. We aimed to study the effect of the time interval from a successful external cephalic version to delivery on the risk for cesarean delivery and assess factors associated with cesarean delivery after a successful version.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, retrospective cohort study, including all successful external cephalic version at two medical centers between 2011 and 2019. We compared patient baseline characteristics, obstetric characteristics, maternal and neonatal outcomes in women that delivered by vaginal delivery with those who delivered by cesarean delivery.

RESULTS

Overall, 769 deliveries were included. Of these, 98 women (12.7%) had cesarean delivery and 671 (87.3%) had vaginal delivery. Women who had cesarean delivery had a higher rate of obesity (44.9% vs 21.9%, p < 0.001; OR 2.88, CI 1.65-5.03) and nulliparity (45.9% vs 24.5%, p < 0.001; OR = 2.58, CI 1.67-3.98). The risk for intrapartum cesarean delivery did not differ according to time interval from external cephalic version to delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

The time interval between successful external cephalic version and delivery was not associated with mode of delivery. This finding is in contrast to previous reports. The risk for cesarean delivery after successful version is higher in nulliparous, obese women, and women whose weight gain in pregnancy was higher.

摘要

目的

与头位胎儿相比,臀位经外倒转术(ECV)成功后的剖宫产风险更高。然而,ECV 尝试至分娩的时间间隔与剖宫产风险的关系尚不清楚。我们旨在研究从 ECV 成功到分娩的时间间隔对剖宫产风险的影响,并评估 ECV 成功后与剖宫产相关的因素。

方法

我们进行了一项多中心回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2011 年至 2019 年在两个医疗中心进行的所有 ECV 成功病例。我们比较了经阴道分娩和剖宫产分娩的患者的基线特征、产科特征、母婴结局。

结果

共纳入 769 例分娩。其中,98 例(12.7%)行剖宫产,671 例(87.3%)行阴道分娩。行剖宫产的患者肥胖率更高(44.9% vs 21.9%,p<0.001;OR 2.88,95%CI 1.65-5.03)和初产妇比例更高(45.9% vs 24.5%,p<0.001;OR=2.58,95%CI 1.67-3.98)。从 ECV 到分娩的时间间隔与产时剖宫产风险无关。

结论

ECV 成功至分娩的时间间隔与分娩方式无关。这一发现与以往的报告不同。在初产妇、肥胖和妊娠体重增加较高的女性中,ECV 成功后剖宫产的风险更高。

相似文献

1
Successful vaginal delivery after external cephalic version (ECV): does time interval from ECV to delivery make a difference? A multicenter study.外倒转术(ECV)后阴道分娩成功:从 ECV 到分娩的时间间隔有影响吗?一项多中心研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Dec;302(6):1361-1367. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05733-w. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
2
Comparison of Fetomaternal Outcome between 47 Deliveries Following Successful External Cephalic Version for Breech Presentation and 7456 Deliveries Following Spontaneous Cephalic Presentation.臀位外倒转术成功后47例分娩与头先露自然分娩7456例的母儿结局比较。
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2018;83(5):477-481. doi: 10.1159/000480013. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
3
Mode of childbirth and neonatal outcome after external cephalic version: A prospective cohort study.外倒转术后的分娩方式与新生儿结局:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Midwifery. 2016 Aug;39:44-8. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.02.014. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
4
Factors associated with intrapartum cesarean section after a successful external cephalic version.成功实施外倒转术(ECV)后与产时剖宫产相关的因素。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec;35(25):9038-9042. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2021.2012652. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
5
Route of delivery following successful external cephalic version.成功实施外倒转术后的分娩方式。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014 Sep;126(3):272-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.03.029. Epub 2014 May 14.
6
Maternal outcomes of term breech presentation delivery: impact of successful external cephalic version in a nationwide sample of delivery admissions in the United States.足月臀位分娩的产妇结局:在美国全国范围内分娩入院样本中成功进行外倒转术的影响。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Jul 8;16(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0941-9.
7
Risk factors for cesarean section and instrumental vaginal delivery after successful external cephalic version.外倒转术成功后剖宫产和器械助产阴道分娩的危险因素。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(12):2005-7. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1072160. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
8
[Breech Presentation: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - External Cephalic Version and other Interventions to turn Breech Babies to Cephalic Presentation].[臀位分娩:CNGOF临床实践指南 - 外倒转术及其他将臀位胎儿转为头位分娩的干预措施]
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2020 Jan;48(1):81-94. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2019.10.024. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
9
Efficacy of a second external cephalic version (ECV) after a successful first external cephalic version with subsequent spontaneous reinversion to breech presentation: a retrospective cohort study.第一 次 外 转 术(ECV) 成 功 后 再 进 行 一 次 ECV 以 防 胎 儿 自 然 复 位 至 臀 位:回 顾 性 队 列 研 究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Apr;303(4):911-916. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05819-5. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
10
Mode of delivery following successful external cephalic version: comparison with spontaneous cephalic presentations at delivery.成功实施外倒转术后的分娩方式:与分娩时自然头位的比较。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013 Oct;35(10):883-888. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30809-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors influencing the effect of external cephalic version: a retrospective nationwide cohort analysis.影响外倒转术效果的因素:一项回顾性全国队列分析。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Oct;308(4):1127-1137. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06763-2. Epub 2022 Sep 7.