Nicosia Francesca M, Spar Malena J, Neumann Alicia, Silvestrini Molly C, Barrientos Maureen, Brown Rebecca T
San Francisco VA Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine of the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Oct;35(10):2947-2954. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06075-8. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
Despite its importance to care and outcomes for older adults, functional status is seldom routinely measured in primary care. Understanding patient perspectives is necessary to develop effective, patient-centered approaches for measuring function, yet we know little about patient views on this topic.
To examine patient and caregiver perspectives on measuring activities of daily living (ADLs) and instrumental ADLs (IADLs).
Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews.
Twenty-eight patients aged 65 or older and five caregivers in primary care clinics at one Veterans Affairs Medical Center.
We conducted interviews to elicit patient and caregiver perspectives on the importance of measuring function, including preferences for method of screening and assessment, wording of questions, and provider communication style. We analyzed interviews using qualitative thematic analysis.
We identified several themes related to measuring function in primary care. First, most participants reported that measuring function is part of quality, holistic care. However, a minority of participants noted that discussing function, especially IADLs, was not medically relevant. Second, in terms of preferences for measuring function, participants noted that interdisciplinary approaches to measuring function are optimal and that face-to-face assessment is most "intimate" and can prompt reflection on one's limitations. However, some participants indicated that self-assessment is less invasive than in-person assessment. Third, participants had varied preferences regarding communicating about function. Participants noted that asking about difficulty with activities versus need for help are distinct and complementary concepts and that providing context is essential when discussing sensitive topics such as functional decline.
Most patients and caregivers reported that measuring function was important, preferred face-to-face assessment, and emphasized the importance of providing context when asking about function. These findings suggest that incorporating patient and caregiver preferences for measuring function can improve satisfaction and experience with functional assessment in primary care.
尽管功能状态对老年人的护理和预后很重要,但在初级保健中很少常规测量。了解患者的观点对于开发有效、以患者为中心的功能测量方法是必要的,但我们对患者在这个话题上的看法知之甚少。
探讨患者和照顾者对测量日常生活活动(ADL)和工具性日常生活活动(IADL)的看法。
采用半结构化访谈的定性研究。
在一家退伍军人事务医疗中心的初级保健诊所中,28名65岁及以上的患者和5名照顾者。
我们进行访谈,以了解患者和照顾者对功能测量重要性的看法,包括对筛查和评估方法、问题措辞以及提供者沟通方式的偏好。我们使用定性主题分析对访谈进行分析。
我们确定了几个与初级保健中功能测量相关的主题。首先,大多数参与者报告说,测量功能是优质整体护理的一部分。然而,少数参与者指出,讨论功能,尤其是IADL,与医学无关。其次,在功能测量的偏好方面,参与者指出,跨学科的功能测量方法是最佳的,面对面评估最“贴心”,可以促使人们反思自己的局限性。然而,一些参与者表示,自我评估比面对面评估的侵入性小。第三,参与者在功能沟通方面有不同的偏好。参与者指出,询问活动困难与需要帮助是不同但互补的概念,在讨论诸如功能衰退等敏感话题时提供背景信息至关重要。
大多数患者和照顾者报告说,测量功能很重要,更喜欢面对面评估,并强调在询问功能时提供背景信息的重要性。这些发现表明,纳入患者和照顾者对功能测量的偏好可以提高初级保健中功能评估的满意度和体验。