• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一次教育研讨会对结直肠癌筛查实践的影响。

The impact of an educational workshop on colorectal screening practices.

作者信息

Fang W L, Mills A S, Wanebo H J, Zfass A M

机构信息

Office of Medical Education, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.

出版信息

J Cancer Educ. 1987;2(1):27-30. doi: 10.1080/08858198709527855.

DOI:10.1080/08858198709527855
PMID:3274966
Abstract

Since its establishment in 1983, the Virginia Colorectal Cancer Control Project has emphasized the importance of routine screening of asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. This has been accomplished through educational workshops that are offered to primary care physicians. These workshops provide didactic information on current concepts in screening and individualized instruction on the use of the flexible sigmoidoscope. Eleven workshops have been conducted since the fall of 1984. During the spring of 1986, a survey was mailed to workshop participants to determine whether changes had occurred in their screening practices. A total of 115 physicians responded to the survey. Prior to the workshop, 86 physicians performed the digital rectal examination; now 100 do. Prior to the workshop, 68 physicians performed the fecal occult blood test; now 89 do. Prior to the workshop, 34 physicians used a flexible scope; now 71 do. Participants found the workshop to be extremely effective in providing individualized instruction.

摘要

自1983年成立以来,弗吉尼亚结直肠癌控制项目一直强调对无症状成年人进行结直肠癌常规筛查的重要性。这是通过为初级保健医生举办的教育研讨会来实现的。这些研讨会提供有关筛查当前概念的教学信息以及使用乙状结肠镜的个性化指导。自1984年秋季以来,已举办了11次研讨会。1986年春季,向研讨会参与者邮寄了一份调查问卷,以确定他们的筛查做法是否发生了变化。共有115名医生回复了调查。研讨会之前,86名医生进行直肠指检;现在有100名医生进行。研讨会之前,68名医生进行粪便潜血试验;现在有89名医生进行。研讨会之前,34名医生使用软式内镜;现在有71名医生使用。参与者发现该研讨会在提供个性化指导方面非常有效。

相似文献

1
The impact of an educational workshop on colorectal screening practices.一次教育研讨会对结直肠癌筛查实践的影响。
J Cancer Educ. 1987;2(1):27-30. doi: 10.1080/08858198709527855.
2
Training primary care physicians in flexible sigmoidoscopy--performance evaluation of 17,167 procedures.对基层医疗医生进行乙状结肠镜检查培训——17167例手术的绩效评估
West J Med. 1988 Feb;148(2):221-4.
3
Complete diagnostic evaluation in colorectal cancer screening: research design and baseline findings.结直肠癌筛查中的完整诊断评估:研究设计与基线结果
Prev Med. 2001 Oct;33(4):249-60. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2001.0878.
4
Survey of the opinions, knowledge, and practices of gastroenterologists regarding colorectal cancer screening and use of the fecal occult blood test.胃肠病学家关于结直肠癌筛查及粪便潜血试验使用的意见、知识和实践调查
Am J Gastroenterol. 2000 Dec;95(12):3629-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.03381.x.
5
Screening for colorectal cancer by primary-care physicians in Long Island (New York) and Connecticut.纽约长岛和康涅狄格州的初级保健医生对结直肠癌的筛查。
Cancer Detect Prev. 1989;13(5-6):301-9.
6
Survey of internal medicine residents' use of the fecal occult blood test and their understanding of colorectal cancer screening and surveillance.内科住院医师粪便潜血试验使用情况及其对结直肠癌筛查与监测理解的调查
Am J Gastroenterol. 2000 Aug;95(8):2068-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.02229.x.
7
Colorectal cancer screening: practices and opinions of primary care physicians.结直肠癌筛查:初级保健医生的实践与观点
Prev Med. 2004 Aug;39(2):279-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.03.037.
8
The practice outcomes of a course in flexible sigmoidoscopy for primary care physicians.
J Med Assoc Ga. 1991 Dec;80(12):711-4.
9
Low-cost flexible sigmoidoscopy screening: a community demonstration and education project.
J Cancer Educ. 1995 Spring;10(1):25-30. doi: 10.1080/08858199509528323.
10
Impact of a physician-oriented intervention on follow-up in colorectal cancer screening.以医生为导向的干预措施对结直肠癌筛查随访的影响。
Prev Med. 2004 Apr;38(4):375-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.11.010.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementing guidelines and innovations in general practice: which interventions are effective?在全科医疗中实施指南与创新:哪些干预措施是有效的?
Br J Gen Pract. 1998 Feb;48(427):991-7.