Mollasharifi Tahmineh, Ahadi Mahsa, Jamali Elena, Moradi Afshin, Asghari Parisa, Maroufizadeh Saman, Kazeminezhad Behrang
Department of Pathology, Clinical Research Development Center, Shahid Modarres Educational Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Pathology, Shohada-e-Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Iran J Pathol. 2020 Summer;15(3):167-174. doi: 10.30699/ijp.2020.115021.2250. Epub 2020 Apr 5.
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Most colorectal cancers (CRCs) arise from adenomatous polyps, and clinical management of this type of polyp is highly dependent on the reliability and validity of the pathological diagnosis. The aim of this study was to examine the interobserver agreement of five pathologists in assessing dysplasia in adenomatous polyps.
In this study, a total of 146 adenomatous polyps of patients undergoing colonoscopy were selected from hospitals of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran between 2017 and 2018. Five pathologists independently classified adenomatous polyps according to histologic type, nuclear pseudostratification, mitotic activity, nuclear polarity, nuclear pleomorphism, nuclear shape, nucleolus, chromatin pattern, cytology grade, architectural features, dysplasia, and final diagnosis. The overall kappa statistic (k) was used to assess agreement among pathologists.
The mean age of the patients was 62.06 ± 13.06 (mean ± SD) with a male-to-female ratio of 2.2:1. The most common site of resection was the sigmoid colon (28.1%). The highest agreement was found for dysplasia grade (=0.415) and histologic type (=0.401), whereas the lowest agreement was found for mitotic activity (=0.185), nuclear shape (=0.187), and nucleolus (=0.196).
Our findings indicate that agreement among pathologists in assessing dysplasia in adenomatous polyps is within fair to moderate levels of agreement. Therefore, there is a vital need to better clarify the current diagnostic criteria.
大多数结直肠癌(CRC)起源于腺瘤性息肉,这类息肉的临床管理高度依赖于病理诊断的可靠性和有效性。本研究旨在检验五位病理学家在评估腺瘤性息肉发育异常方面的观察者间一致性。
本研究从伊朗德黑兰沙希德·贝赫什提医科大学的医院中选取了2017年至2018年间接受结肠镜检查患者的146枚腺瘤性息肉。五位病理学家根据组织学类型、核假复层、有丝分裂活性、核极性、核多形性、核形状、核仁、染色质模式、细胞学分级、结构特征、发育异常及最终诊断对腺瘤性息肉进行独立分类。采用总体kappa统计量(k)评估病理学家之间的一致性。
患者的平均年龄为62.06±13.06(均值±标准差),男女比例为2.2:1。最常见的切除部位是乙状结肠(28.1%)。发育异常分级(=0.415)和组织学类型(=0.401)的一致性最高,而有丝分裂活性(=0.185)、核形状(=0.187)和核仁(=0.196)的一致性最低。
我们的研究结果表明,病理学家在评估腺瘤性息肉发育异常方面的一致性处于中等偏下水平。因此,迫切需要更好地明确当前的诊断标准。