Maurer H M, Beltangady M, Gehan E A, Crist W, Hammond D, Hays D M, Heyn R, Lawrence W, Newton W, Ortega J
Children's Medical Center, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond 23298.
Cancer. 1988 Jan 15;61(2):209-20. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19880115)61:2<209::aid-cncr2820610202>3.0.co;2-l.
The results of treatment of 686, previously untreated patients younger than 21 years with rhabdomyosarcoma or undifferentiated sarcoma, who were entered on Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study-I (IRS-I) were analyzed after a minimum potential follow-up time of 7 years. Patients in Clinical Group I (localized disease, completely resected) were randomized to receive either vincristine, dactinomycin, and cyclophosphamide (VAC) or VAC + radiation. At 5 years, approximately 80% of patients given either treatment were still disease-free and there was no significant difference between treatments in the overall percentages of patients surviving of 93% and 81%, respectively (P = 0.67). Patients in Clinical Group II (regional disease, grossly resected) were randomized to receive either vincristine and dactinomycin (VA) + radiation or VAC + radiation. At 5 years, 72% and 65% of the patients, respectively, were disease-free and there was no evidence of a difference between treatments (P = 0.46). The overall survival percentage at 5 years was approximately 72% for both treatments. Patients in Clinical Groups III (gross residual disease after surgery) and IV (metastatic disease) were randomized to receive either "pulse" VAC + radiation or "pulse" VAC + Adriamycin (doxorubicin) + radiation. The complete remission (CR) rate was 69% in Clinical Group III and 50% in IV, with no statistically significant difference in CR rates between treatments in either group. Those who achieved a CR had a nearly 60% chance of staying in remission for 5 years in Clinical Group III compared with approximately 30% in Clinical Group IV. The overall survival percentage at 5 years was 52% in Clinical Group III compared to 20% in Clinical Group IV (P less than 0.0001). The 5-year survival percentage for the entire cohort of 686 patients was 55%. Survival after relapse was poor, being 32% at 1 year and 17% at 2 years. The risk of distant metastasis was much greater than the risk of local recurrence within each clinical group, and there was no evidence of differing types of relapses between treatments. Primary tumors of the orbit and genitourinary tract carried the best prognosis, whereas tumors of the retroperitoneum had the worst prognosis. The authors conclude that for the therapeutic regimens evaluated there was no therapeutic advantage to including radiation in the treatment of Clinical Group I disease, or cyclophosphamide given as a daily low-dose oral regimen in the treatment of Clinical Group II disease or Adriamycin in the treatment of Clinical Groups III and IV diseases.
对686例年龄小于21岁、此前未经治疗的横纹肌肉瘤或未分化肉瘤患者进行了分析,这些患者参与了横纹肌肉瘤协作组研究I(IRS-I),最短随访时间为7年。临床I组(局限性疾病,完全切除)的患者被随机分为接受长春新碱、放线菌素D和环磷酰胺(VAC)或VAC加放疗。5年时,接受任何一种治疗的患者中约80%仍无疾病,两种治疗方法的总体生存率分别为93%和81%,无显著差异(P = 0.67)。临床II组(区域疾病,大体切除)的患者被随机分为接受长春新碱和放线菌素D(VA)加放疗或VAC加放疗。5年时,分别有72%和65%的患者无疾病,且无证据表明两种治疗方法有差异(P = 0.46)。两种治疗方法5年时的总体生存率约为72%。临床III组(手术后有大量残留疾病)和IV组(转移性疾病)的患者被随机分为接受“脉冲式”VAC加放疗或“脉冲式”VAC加阿霉素(多柔比星)加放疗。临床III组的完全缓解(CR)率为69%,IV组为50%,两组治疗的CR率无统计学显著差异。在临床III组中,达到CR的患者有近60%的机会在5年内保持缓解,而临床IV组约为30%。临床III组5年时的总体生存率为52%,而临床IV组为20%(P小于0.0001)。686例患者的整个队列5年生存率为55%。复发后的生存率很低,1年时为32%,2年时为17%。每个临床组中远处转移的风险远大于局部复发的风险,且无证据表明不同治疗方法之间复发类型存在差异。眼眶和泌尿生殖道的原发性肿瘤预后最好,而腹膜后肿瘤预后最差。作者得出结论,对于所评估的治疗方案,在临床I组疾病的治疗中加入放疗、在临床II组疾病的治疗中给予低剂量口服环磷酰胺或在临床III组和IV组疾病的治疗中给予阿霉素均无治疗优势。