• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与传统紫杉烷类药物相比,纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇作为乳腺癌新辅助治疗效果更好吗?一项荟萃分析。

Is nab-paclitaxel better than conventional taxanes as neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer? A meta-analysis.

作者信息

Li Yong, Lu Xiaoju, Lin Qimou, Li Weiwen

机构信息

Department of Breast Surgery, Affiliated Jiangmen Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Jiangmen City, Guangdong Province, P.R. China.

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Jiangmen People's Hospital, Jiangmen City, Guangdong Province, P.R. China.

出版信息

J Int Med Res. 2020 Aug;48(8):300060520943473. doi: 10.1177/0300060520943473.

DOI:10.1177/0300060520943473
PMID:32762463
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7416144/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the efficacy and safety of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) with conventional taxanes as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

METHODS

We searched the literature using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from their inception to December 15, 2019 based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The relevant studies compared pathologic complete response (pCR) and adverse event rates.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included five studies and 2335 patients. Compared with conventional taxanes, neoadjuvant chemotherapy with nab-paclitaxel was associated with a higher pCR rate (odds ratio [OR] = 1.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.16-1.67), especially among patients with triple-negative breast cancer or Ki67 indices of >20%. Pooled outcomes also revealed better event-free survival in the nab-paclitaxel group (hazard ratio = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.57-0.85). However, all-grade (OR = 2.17, 95% CI = 1.38-3.40) and grade ≥3 peripheral sensory neuropathy (OR = 3.92, 95% CI = 2.44-6.28) were more frequent in the nab-paclitaxel group.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis implied that nab-paclitaxel more effectively improved pCR than conventional taxanes. Nab-paclitaxel may have greater benefits in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. However, additional attention is required for the early diagnosis and management of peripheral sensory neuropathy.

摘要

目的

本研究比较了纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇(nab-紫杉醇)与传统紫杉类药物作为乳腺癌新辅助化疗的疗效和安全性。

方法

我们根据预先设定的纳入和排除标准,检索了PubMed、Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science自创建至2019年12月15日的文献。相关研究比较了病理完全缓解(pCR)率和不良事件发生率。

结果

荟萃分析纳入了五项研究,共2335例患者。与传统紫杉类药物相比,nab-紫杉醇新辅助化疗的pCR率更高(优势比[OR]=1.39,95%置信区间[CI]=1.16-1.67),尤其是在三阴性乳腺癌患者或Ki67指数>20%的患者中。汇总结果还显示nab-紫杉醇组的无事件生存率更好(风险比=0.69,95%CI=0.57-0.85)。然而,nab-紫杉醇组的所有级别(OR=2.17,95%CI=1.38-3.40)和≥3级周围感觉神经病变(OR=3.92,95%CI=2.44-6.28)更为常见。

结论

这项荟萃分析表明,nab-紫杉醇比传统紫杉类药物更有效地提高了pCR率。nab-紫杉醇可能对三阴性乳腺癌患者有更大益处。然而,需要对周围感觉神经病变的早期诊断和管理给予更多关注。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6a6/7416144/1b84b6b05211/10.1177_0300060520943473-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6a6/7416144/5e86f5aaaa4f/10.1177_0300060520943473-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6a6/7416144/dc182ee49a8d/10.1177_0300060520943473-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6a6/7416144/083a623aefbf/10.1177_0300060520943473-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6a6/7416144/95d85bfe8e53/10.1177_0300060520943473-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6a6/7416144/393fbb7b9837/10.1177_0300060520943473-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6a6/7416144/1b84b6b05211/10.1177_0300060520943473-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6a6/7416144/5e86f5aaaa4f/10.1177_0300060520943473-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6a6/7416144/dc182ee49a8d/10.1177_0300060520943473-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6a6/7416144/083a623aefbf/10.1177_0300060520943473-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6a6/7416144/95d85bfe8e53/10.1177_0300060520943473-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6a6/7416144/393fbb7b9837/10.1177_0300060520943473-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6a6/7416144/1b84b6b05211/10.1177_0300060520943473-fig6.jpg

相似文献

1
Is nab-paclitaxel better than conventional taxanes as neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer? A meta-analysis.与传统紫杉烷类药物相比,纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇作为乳腺癌新辅助治疗效果更好吗?一项荟萃分析。
J Int Med Res. 2020 Aug;48(8):300060520943473. doi: 10.1177/0300060520943473.
2
Comparison between nab-paclitaxel and solvent-based taxanes as neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.白蛋白结合型紫杉醇与溶剂型紫杉类药物作为乳腺癌新辅助治疗的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Feb 4;21(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-07831-7.
3
Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel as neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇作为乳腺癌新辅助化疗的系统评价和Meta分析
Oncotarget. 2017 Mar 7;8(10):17360-17372. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14477.
4
Comparing Neoadjuvant Nab-paclitaxel vs Paclitaxel Both Followed by Anthracycline Regimens in Women With ERBB2/HER2-Negative Breast Cancer-The Evaluating Treatment With Neoadjuvant Abraxane (ETNA) Trial: A Randomized Phase 3 Clinical Trial.比较 ERBB2/HER2 阴性乳腺癌女性患者新辅助 Nab-紫杉醇与紫杉醇联合蒽环类药物治疗的疗效-新辅助 ABI 紫杉醇(ETNA)试验的疗效评估:一项随机 3 期临床试验。
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Mar 1;4(3):302-308. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.4612.
5
Efficacy and safety of nanoparticle-albumin-bound paclitaxel compared with conventional taxanes in women with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.白蛋白结合型紫杉醇纳米粒与传统紫杉类药物治疗乳腺癌女性患者的疗效和安全性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Palliat Med. 2022 Jul;11(7):2382-2394. doi: 10.21037/apm-22-690.
6
Randomized Multicenter Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Therapy Comparing Weekly Nab-paclitaxel Followed by FEC With Docetaxel Followed by FEC in HER2 Early-stage Breast Cancer.随机多中心 II 期试验:比较新辅助治疗在 HER2 早期乳腺癌中使用nab-紫杉醇联合 FEC 与多西紫杉醇联合 FEC 的疗效。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2018 Dec;18(6):474-480. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2018.06.012. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
7
Adverse Event Profile for Nanoparticle Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel Compared With Solvent-Based Taxanes in Solid-Organ Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.纳米白蛋白结合紫杉醇与溶剂型紫杉烷类药物在实体瘤中的不良反应特征比较:一项随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Pharmacother. 2022 Aug;56(8):898-909. doi: 10.1177/10600280211058385. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
8
SWOG S0800 (NCI CDR0000636131): addition of bevacizumab to neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel with dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide improves pathologic complete response (pCR) rates in inflammatory or locally advanced breast cancer.SWOG S0800(NCI CDR0000636131):在新辅助白蛋白结合型紫杉醇联合剂量密集型阿霉素和环磷酰胺方案中加入贝伐单抗,可提高炎性或局部晚期乳腺癌的病理完全缓解(pCR)率。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Aug;158(3):485-95. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-3889-6. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
9
Efficacy comparisons of solvent-based paclitaxel, liposomal paclitaxel, nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel, and docetaxel after neoadjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer.新辅助全身治疗后溶剂型紫杉醇、脂质体紫杉醇、白蛋白结合型紫杉醇和多西紫杉醇的疗效比较。
Nanomedicine. 2023 Nov;54:102707. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2023.102707. Epub 2023 Sep 17.
10
Feasibility Study of Nanoparticle Albumin-Bound-Paclitaxel and S-1 Followed by Epirubicin/Cyclophosphamide as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Operable Breast Cancer: A Prospective Study.纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇与S-1序贯表柔比星/环磷酰胺作为可手术乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗的可行性研究:一项前瞻性研究
Clin Breast Cancer. 2022 Apr;22(3):235-243. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2021.06.006. Epub 2021 Jun 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Molecular Docking and Pharmacokinetic Profiling of Nab-paclitaxel as Advanced Chemotherapeutic Agent Against HER-2 Positive Breast Cancer Patients.纳武利尤单抗联合化疗治疗晚期胃癌的疗效及安全性的 Meta 分析
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024 Oct 1;25(10):3447-3456. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.10.3447.
2
A meta-analysis of the incidence and risk of skin toxicity with nab-paclitaxel and paclitaxel in cancer treatment.纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇与紫杉醇在癌症治疗中皮肤毒性发生率及风险的荟萃分析。
Am J Transl Res. 2023 Jun 15;15(6):4279-4290. eCollection 2023.
3
Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant pertuzumab plus trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy regimen in Chinese patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer: a real-world retrospective multi-center cohort study.

本文引用的文献

1
A randomized, controlled phase II trial of neoadjuvant ado-trastuzumab emtansine, lapatinib, and nab-paclitaxel versus trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and paclitaxel in HER2-positive breast cancer (TEAL study).一项随机、对照的 II 期临床试验,比较了新辅助阿特珠单抗、拉帕替尼和白蛋白紫杉醇与曲妥珠单抗、帕妥珠单抗和紫杉醇治疗 HER2 阳性乳腺癌(TEAL 研究)。
Breast Cancer Res. 2019 Sep 2;21(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s13058-019-1186-0.
2
NAB-Paclitaxel Improves Disease-Free Survival in Early Breast Cancer: GBG 69-GeparSepto.NAB-紫杉醇改善早期乳腺癌的无病生存:GBG 69-GeparSepto 研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Sep 1;37(25):2226-2234. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01842. Epub 2019 May 13.
3
新辅助帕妥珠单抗联合曲妥珠单抗与化疗方案在中国HER2阳性早期乳腺癌患者中的疗效和安全性:一项真实世界回顾性多中心队列研究
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Dec;10(24):1387. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-6054.
4
A Canadian national guideline on the neoadjuvant treatment of invasive breast cancer, including patient assessment, systemic therapy, and local management principles.加拿大浸润性乳腺癌新辅助治疗国家指南,包括患者评估、全身治疗和局部管理原则。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 May;193(1):1-20. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06522-6. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
5
Case Report: Paclitaxel-Induced Pneumonitis in Early Breast Cancer: A Single Institution Experience and Review.病例报告:早期乳腺癌中紫杉醇诱导的肺炎:单机构经验与综述
Front Oncol. 2021 Jun 23;11:701424. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.701424. eCollection 2021.
Efficacy of two-weekly nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.
两周一次白蛋白结合型紫杉醇纳米粒作为乳腺癌新辅助化疗的疗效。
Nanomedicine (Lond). 2019 Jun;14(12):1595-1603. doi: 10.2217/nnm-2018-0485. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
4
Randomized Multicenter Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Therapy Comparing Weekly Nab-paclitaxel Followed by FEC With Docetaxel Followed by FEC in HER2 Early-stage Breast Cancer.随机多中心 II 期试验:比较新辅助治疗在 HER2 早期乳腺癌中使用nab-紫杉醇联合 FEC 与多西紫杉醇联合 FEC 的疗效。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2018 Dec;18(6):474-480. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2018.06.012. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
5
Comparing Neoadjuvant Nab-paclitaxel vs Paclitaxel Both Followed by Anthracycline Regimens in Women With ERBB2/HER2-Negative Breast Cancer-The Evaluating Treatment With Neoadjuvant Abraxane (ETNA) Trial: A Randomized Phase 3 Clinical Trial.比较 ERBB2/HER2 阴性乳腺癌女性患者新辅助 Nab-紫杉醇与紫杉醇联合蒽环类药物治疗的疗效-新辅助 ABI 紫杉醇(ETNA)试验的疗效评估:一项随机 3 期临床试验。
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Mar 1;4(3):302-308. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.4612.
6
Role of nab-paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇在转移性乳腺癌中的作用:一项随机临床试验的荟萃分析
Oncotarget. 2017 Jun 30;8(42):72950-72958. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18900. eCollection 2017 Sep 22.
7
Efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m and nab-paclitaxel 150 mg/m compared to paclitaxel in early high-risk breast cancer. Results from the neoadjuvant randomized GeparSepto study (GBG 69).与紫杉醇相比,125mg/m²和150mg/m²的纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇在早期高危乳腺癌中的疗效和安全性。新辅助随机GeparSepto研究(GBG 69)的结果。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Jun;163(3):495-506. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4200-1. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
8
Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel as neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇作为乳腺癌新辅助化疗的系统评价和Meta分析
Oncotarget. 2017 Mar 7;8(10):17360-17372. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14477.
9
Nab-paclitaxel versus solvent-based paclitaxel in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer (GeparSepto-GBG 69): a randomised, phase 3 trial.白蛋白结合型紫杉醇对比溶剂型紫杉醇用于早期乳腺癌新辅助化疗(GeparSepto-GBG 69):一项随机、3 期试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Mar;17(3):345-356. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00542-2. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
10
Associations and indications of Ki67 expression with clinicopathological parameters and molecular subtypes in invasive breast cancer: A population-based study.浸润性乳腺癌中Ki67表达与临床病理参数及分子亚型的相关性和指征:一项基于人群的研究。
Oncol Lett. 2015 Sep;10(3):1741-1748. doi: 10.3892/ol.2015.3461. Epub 2015 Jul 6.