Department of Cell Biology and Genetics, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic (Z.D.); Department of Microbiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (M.K., M.L.); The Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Washington University in St. Louis and St. Louis College of Pharmacy, St. Louis, Missouri (T.P.B.); Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta (B.P.W.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy (A.G., F.G.); TES Pharma, Corso Vannucci, Perugia, Italy (R.P.); The Department of Biological and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York (J.M.); Division of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, UPMC Presbyterian Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (S.J.O.); Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (R.B.S.); Department of Pathology, Mary H. Weiser Food Allergy Center, and Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan (C.H.K.); and Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York (S.M.).
Department of Cell Biology and Genetics, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic (Z.D.); Department of Microbiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (M.K., M.L.); The Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Washington University in St. Louis and St. Louis College of Pharmacy, St. Louis, Missouri (T.P.B.); Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta (B.P.W.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy (A.G., F.G.); TES Pharma, Corso Vannucci, Perugia, Italy (R.P.); The Department of Biological and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York (J.M.); Division of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, UPMC Presbyterian Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (S.J.O.); Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (R.B.S.); Department of Pathology, Mary H. Weiser Food Allergy Center, and Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan (C.H.K.); and Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York (S.M.)
Mol Pharmacol. 2020 Oct;98(4):343-349. doi: 10.1124/molpharm.120.000035. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
For decades, traditional drug discovery has used natural product and synthetic chemistry approaches to generate libraries of compounds, with some ending as promising drug candidates. A complementary approach has been to adopt the concept of biomimicry of natural products and metabolites so as to improve multiple drug-like features of the parent molecule. In this effort, promiscuous and weak interactions between ligands and receptors are often ignored in a drug discovery process. In this Emerging Concepts article, we highlight microbial metabolite mimicry, whereby parent metabolites have weak interactions with their receptors that then have led to discrete examples of more potent and effective drug-like molecules. We show specific examples of parent-metabolite mimics with potent effects in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, we show examples of emerging microbial ligand-receptor interactions and provide a context in which these ligands could be improved as potential drugs. A balanced conceptual advance is provided in which we also acknowledge potential pitfalls-hyperstimulation of finely balanced receptor-ligand interactions could also be detrimental. However, with balance, we provide examples of where this emerging concept needs to be tested. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Microbial metabolite mimicry is a novel way to expand on the chemical repertoire of future drugs. The emerging concept is now explained using specific examples of the discovery of therapeutic leads from microbial metabolites.
几十年来,传统的药物发现一直采用天然产物和合成化学方法来生成化合物库,其中一些最终成为有前途的药物候选物。另一种补充方法是采用天然产物和代谢物仿生的概念,以提高母体分子的多种类药性特征。在这一努力中,配体和受体之间的混杂和弱相互作用在药物发现过程中经常被忽略。在这篇新兴概念文章中,我们强调了微生物代谢产物模拟,即母体代谢物与受体的弱相互作用,然后导致更有效和有效的类药分子的离散例子。我们展示了具有体外和体内强效的母体代谢物模拟物的具体实例。此外,我们展示了新兴微生物配体-受体相互作用的实例,并提供了一个可以改善这些配体作为潜在药物的背景。我们提供了一个平衡的概念性进展,其中我们也承认潜在的陷阱-受体-配体相互作用的过度刺激也可能是有害的。然而,通过平衡,我们提供了一些需要测试这一新兴概念的例子。意义陈述:微生物代谢产物模拟是扩展未来药物化学库的一种新方法。新兴概念现在通过从微生物代谢产物中发现治疗性先导化合物的具体实例来解释。