• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型静脉导管冲洗装置(BaroFlush™)的疗效、安全性和便利性:一项前瞻性研究。

The Efficacy, Safety, and Convenience of a New Device for Flushing Intravenous Catheters (Baro Flush™): A Prospective Study.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University, Incheon 21565, Korea.

Center for Medical Robotics, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Incheon 21565, Korea.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Aug 5;56(8):393. doi: 10.3390/medicina56080393.

DOI:10.3390/medicina56080393
PMID:32764477
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7466298/
Abstract

: An effective flushing technique is essential to reduce intravenous (IV)-related complications and improve patient care. New technology should contribute to such improvements, while reducing costs and increasing care efficiency. This study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and convenience of a new flushing technique using a Baro Flush™ controller. : We evaluated the efficacy and safety of Baro Flush™ by measuring the infusion flushing volume and pressure in vitro. Afterwards, we prospectively enrolled 3000 patients with flushing and assigned 1500 patients with a new technique for flushing and 1500 with a conventional flushing method, which was performed by 48 registered nurses (RNs) at the Gil Medical Center in June 2018. The efficacy, safety, and convenience of the new flushing method were evaluated though a questionnaire survey. : The average flushing pressure was 12.5 ± 0.6 psi (86.18 ± 4.14 kPa) with 1.2 ± 0.2 mL per flush, as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention based on 85 experiments. No IV-catheter-related complications were reported by the RNs during the study. More than 80% of the RNs reported that the new flushing method was easier to learn, improved care efficacy, and was more convenient than conventional flushing. : The new flushing method using a Baro Flush™ controller showed improved efficacy, safety, and convenience compared with the conventional flushing method, and no IV-catheter-related complications occurred, including occlusion and inflammation. The new flushing method promises to reduce IV-catheter-related complications and shows improved efficacy, safety, and convenience.

摘要

一种有效的冲洗技术对于减少静脉内(IV)相关并发症和改善患者护理至关重要。新技术应该有助于提高这些方面,同时降低成本和提高护理效率。本研究评估了使用 Baro Flush™控制器的新冲洗技术的疗效、安全性和便利性。

我们通过测量体外输液冲洗量和压力来评估 Baro Flush™的疗效和安全性。之后,我们前瞻性地招募了 3000 名需要冲洗的患者,并将 1500 名患者分配到新的冲洗技术组,将 1500 名患者分配到常规冲洗方法组,该研究于 2018 年 6 月在 Gil 医疗中心由 48 名注册护士(RN)完成。通过问卷调查评估新冲洗方法的疗效、安全性和便利性。

根据疾病预防控制中心基于 85 次实验的建议,平均冲洗压力为 12.5±0.6psi(86.18±4.14kPa),每次冲洗 1.2±0.2mL。在研究期间,没有护士报告与静脉导管相关的并发症。超过 80%的护士报告说,新的冲洗方法更容易学习,提高了护理效果,比常规冲洗更方便。

与传统冲洗方法相比,使用 Baro Flush™控制器的新冲洗方法显示出了更好的疗效、安全性和便利性,而且没有发生与静脉导管相关的并发症,包括阻塞和炎症。新的冲洗方法有望减少与静脉导管相关的并发症,并显示出更好的疗效、安全性和便利性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f67/7466298/69805b915816/medicina-56-00393-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f67/7466298/74779ff417f7/medicina-56-00393-g001a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f67/7466298/69805b915816/medicina-56-00393-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f67/7466298/74779ff417f7/medicina-56-00393-g001a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f67/7466298/69805b915816/medicina-56-00393-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The Efficacy, Safety, and Convenience of a New Device for Flushing Intravenous Catheters (Baro Flush™): A Prospective Study.新型静脉导管冲洗装置(BaroFlush™)的疗效、安全性和便利性:一项前瞻性研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Aug 5;56(8):393. doi: 10.3390/medicina56080393.
2
Continuous infusion versus intermittent flushing to prevent loss of function of peripheral intravenous catheters used for drug administration in newborn infants.持续输注与间歇性冲管预防新生儿静脉给药外周静脉导管功能丧失的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19(4):CD004593. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004593.pub2.
3
Varied flushing frequency and volume to prevent peripheral intravenous catheter failure: a pilot, factorial randomised controlled trial in adult medical-surgical hospital patients.采用不同的冲洗频率和量预防外周静脉导管失功:一项针对成年内科-外科住院患者的先导性析因随机对照试验
Trials. 2016 Jul 26;17(1):348. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1470-6.
4
Normal saline flushes performed once daily maintain peripheral intravenous catheter patency: a randomised controlled trial.每日进行一次生理盐水冲洗可维持外周静脉导管通畅:一项随机对照试验。
Arch Dis Child. 2015 Jul;100(7):700-3. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-307478. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
5
The impact of flushing with pre-filled saline syringes on the incidence of peripheral venous catheter failure: A quasi-experimental study.预充式生理盐水注射器冲管对外周静脉导管失败发生率的影响:一项半实验性研究。
J Vasc Access. 2020 Jul;21(4):490-496. doi: 10.1177/1129729819888423. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
6
Utilization of an elastomeric continuous infusion device to maintain catheter patency.使用弹性体连续输注装置维持导管通畅。
J Intraven Nurs. 2001 Mar-Apr;24(2):102-6.
7
Technology of flushing vascular access devices.血管通路装置的冲洗技术
J Infus Nurs. 2006 May-Jun;29(3):137-45. doi: 10.1097/00129804-200605000-00003.
8
A randomized controlled comparison of flushing protocols in home care patients with peripherally inserted central catheters.家庭护理中经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管患者不同封管方案的随机对照比较
J Infus Nurs. 2014 Jul-Aug;37(4):270-81. doi: 10.1097/NAN.0000000000000050.
9
Intermittent flushing improves cannula patency compared to continuous infusion for peripherally inserted venous catheters in newborns: results from a prospective observational study.间歇性冲洗相较于连续输注可改善新生儿外周静脉留置导管的通畅性:一项前瞻性观察研究的结果。
J Perinat Med. 2012 Jan 19;40(3):311-4. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2011-1000.
10
Introducing the midline catheter as a new intravenous access device in neonates.介绍中线导管作为新生儿一种新的静脉通路装置。
Neonatal Intensive Care. 1992 May-Jun;5(3):36-42.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of the efficacy of an infusion pump or standard IV push injection to deliver naloxone in treatment of opioid toxicity.比较输注泵或标准静脉推注注射纳洛酮治疗阿片类药物中毒的疗效。
Acute Crit Care. 2020 Feb;35(1):38-43. doi: 10.4266/acc.2020.00010. Epub 2020 Feb 29.
2
Blood stream infections associated with central and peripheral venous catheters.血流感染与中心和外周静脉导管相关。
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Oct 15;19(1):841. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4505-2.
3
Heuristic evaluation and simulated use testing of infusion pumps to inform pump selection.
启发式评估和输液泵的模拟使用测试,以提供泵的选择信息。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Nov;131:103932. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.07.011. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
4
Flushing of peripheral intravenous catheters: A pilot, factorial, randomised controlled trial of high versus low frequency and volume in paediatrics.外周静脉导管的冲管:一项针对儿科高频与低频及不同容量冲管的探索性、析因、随机对照试验。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2020 Jan;56(1):22-29. doi: 10.1111/jpc.14482. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
5
From insertion to removal: A multicenter survival analysis of an admitted cohort with peripheral intravenous catheters inserted in the emergency department.从插入到移除:急诊科置入外周静脉导管的住院患者队列的多中心生存分析。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018 Oct;39(10):1216-1221. doi: 10.1017/ice.2018.190. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
6
Phlebitis Signs and Symptoms With Peripheral Intravenous Catheters: Incidence and Correlation Study.外周静脉导管相关静脉炎的体征和症状:发生率及相关性研究
J Infus Nurs. 2018 Jul/Aug;41(4):260-263. doi: 10.1097/NAN.0000000000000288.
7
Central line bundle for prevention of central line-associated bloodstream infection for totally implantable venous access devices (ports) in pediatric cancer patients.用于预防儿科癌症患者完全植入式静脉通路装置(端口)相关中心静脉导管血流感染的中心静脉导管束
J Vasc Access. 2018 Jul;19(4):358-365. doi: 10.1177/1129729818757955. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
8
Impact of flushing with aseptic non-touch technique using pre-filled flush or manually prepared syringes on central venous catheter occlusion and bloodstream infections in pediatric hemato-oncology patients: A randomized controlled study.使用预充式冲洗器或手动配制注射器采用无菌非接触技术冲洗对儿科血液肿瘤患者中心静脉导管堵塞和血流感染的影响:一项随机对照研究。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2018 Apr;33:78-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
9
One needle, one syringe, only one time? A survey of physician and nurse knowledge, attitudes, and practices around injection safety.一针、一管、仅一次?一项关于医师和护士在注射安全方面的知识、态度和实践的调查。
Am J Infect Control. 2017 Sep 1;45(9):1018-1023. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.04.292. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
10
A concealed observational study of infection control and safe injection practices in Jordanian governmental hospitals.约旦政府医院感染控制和安全注射实践的隐蔽观察性研究。
Am J Infect Control. 2017 Oct 1;45(10):1127-1132. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.04.293. Epub 2017 Jun 13.