• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

启发式评估和输液泵的模拟使用测试,以提供泵的选择信息。

Heuristic evaluation and simulated use testing of infusion pumps to inform pump selection.

机构信息

Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

Department of Quality and Safety, New Territories East Cluster, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Int J Med Inform. 2019 Nov;131:103932. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.07.011. Epub 2019 Jul 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.07.011
PMID:31557700
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Poorly designed infusion pumps can lead to user errors and adverse incidents. Therefore, assessments of their usability and performance that can inform managerial decisions about the selection of appropriate medical devices are essential.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify design deficiencies and evaluate the usability and performance of four infusion pump models and thus inform decisions about infusion pump selection.

METHODS

Four evaluators evaluated the interface designs of the pumps according to a series of design principles in a heuristic evaluation in order to identify pump design deficiencies. Additionally, 60 registered nurses participated in simulated use testing to perform a series of tasks using the pumps in order to examine the pump performances. Outcome measures included task completion time, frequency of deviations, frequency of requests for assistance, and nurses' perceptions.

RESULTS

Design issues identified included system status visibility, information access, and error prevention. The results of simulated use testing favored some pumps over others, depending on which outcome measures were considered.

CONCLUSIONS

Heuristic evaluations and simulated use testing can provide information about the basic usability of medical devices and related operational issues. However, practitioners should select appropriate evaluation principles, testing tasks, and outcome measures based on the tested medical devices and contexts.

摘要

背景

设计不佳的输液泵可能会导致用户错误和不良事件。因此,评估其可用性和性能对于告知有关选择合适医疗器械的管理决策至关重要。

目的

本研究旨在确定设计缺陷,并评估四种输液泵模型的可用性和性能,从而为输液泵选择提供信息。

方法

四名评估员根据启发式评估中的一系列设计原则评估了泵的界面设计,以确定泵设计缺陷。此外,60 名注册护士参与了模拟使用测试,以使用这些泵执行一系列任务,以检查泵的性能。结果衡量标准包括任务完成时间、偏差频率、请求协助的频率以及护士的看法。

结果

确定的设计问题包括系统状态可见性、信息访问和错误预防。根据所考虑的结果衡量标准,模拟使用测试的结果对某些泵有利。

结论

启发式评估和模拟使用测试可以提供有关医疗器械基本可用性和相关操作问题的信息。但是,从业者应根据所测试的医疗器械和环境选择适当的评估原则、测试任务和结果衡量标准。

相似文献

1
Heuristic evaluation and simulated use testing of infusion pumps to inform pump selection.启发式评估和输液泵的模拟使用测试,以提供泵的选择信息。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Nov;131:103932. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.07.011. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
2
Using usability heuristics to evaluate patient safety of medical devices.运用可用性启发式评估医疗设备的患者安全性。
J Biomed Inform. 2003 Feb-Apr;36(1-2):23-30. doi: 10.1016/s1532-0464(03)00060-1.
3
Heuristic evaluation of infusion pumps: implications for patient safety in Intensive Care Units.输液泵的启发式评估:对重症监护病房患者安全的影响。
Int J Med Inform. 2004 Nov;73(11-12):771-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2004.08.002.
4
Usability of smart infusion pumps: A heuristic evaluation.智能输液泵的可用性:启发式评估。
Appl Ergon. 2022 Jan;98:103584. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103584. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
5
Operating manual-based usability evaluation of medical devices: an effective patient safety screening method.基于操作手册的医疗器械可用性评估:一种有效的患者安全筛查方法。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2006 Apr;32(4):214-20. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(06)32027-2.
6
Applying usability heuristics to radiotherapy systems.将可用性启发式应用于放射治疗系统。
Radiother Oncol. 2012 Jan;102(1):142-7. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.05.077. Epub 2011 Jul 4.
7
Improving Infusion Pump Safety Through Usability Testing.通过可用性测试提高输液泵安全性
J Nurs Care Qual. 2017 Apr/Jun;32(2):141-149. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000208.
8
Usability evaluation of order sets in a computerised provider order entry system.计算机化医嘱录入系统中医嘱集的可用性评估。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Nov;20(11):932-40. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.050021. Epub 2011 Jul 31.
9
Evaluation of user interface and workflow design of a bedside nursing clinical decision support system.床边护理临床决策支持系统的用户界面与工作流程设计评估
Interact J Med Res. 2013 Jan 31;2(1):e4. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.2402.
10
An extended hierarchical task analysis for error prediction in medical devices.用于医疗设备错误预测的扩展分层任务分析
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003;2003:165-9.

引用本文的文献

1
A review of human factors and infusion pumps: lessons for procurement.人类因素与输液泵综述:采购经验教训
Front Digit Health. 2025 Feb 4;7:1425409. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1425409. eCollection 2025.
2
Prioritizing Patient Safety: Analysis of the Procurement Process of Infusion Pumps in Spain.优先考虑患者安全:西班牙输液泵采购流程分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Dec 14;20(24):7179. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20247179.
3
Nurses' Involvement in the Development and Usability Assessment of an Innovative Peripheral Intravenous Catheterisation Pack: A Mix-Method Study.
护士参与创新型外周静脉置管包的开发和可用性评估:混合方法研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 5;19(17):11130. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191711130.
4
Usability testing of radiotherapy systems as a medical device evaluation tool to inform hospital procurement decision-making.作为一种医疗设备评估工具的放射治疗系统可用性测试,为医院采购决策提供信息。
Sci Prog. 2021 Jul-Sep;104(3):368504211036129. doi: 10.1177/00368504211036129.
5
The Efficacy, Safety, and Convenience of a New Device for Flushing Intravenous Catheters (Baro Flush™): A Prospective Study.新型静脉导管冲洗装置(BaroFlush™)的疗效、安全性和便利性:一项前瞻性研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Aug 5;56(8):393. doi: 10.3390/medicina56080393.
6
Effectiveness of Mobile App-Assisted Self-Care Interventions for Improving Patient Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and/or Hypertension: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.移动应用辅助自我护理干预在改善 2 型糖尿病和/或高血压患者结局中的有效性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Aug 4;8(8):e15779. doi: 10.2196/15779.