Słomko Joanna, Estévez-López Fernando, Kujawski Sławomir, Zawadka-Kunikowska Monika, Tafil-Klawe Małgorzata, Klawe Jacek J, Morten Karl J, Szrajda Justyna, Murovska Modra, Newton Julia L, Zalewski Paweł
Department of Hygiene, Epidemiology, Ergonomy and Postgraduate Education, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, M. Sklodowskiej-Curie 9, 85-094 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, PO Box 2040 Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J Clin Med. 2020 Aug 5;9(8):2531. doi: 10.3390/jcm9082531.
In this study we set out to define the characteristics of autonomic subgroups of patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS). The study included 131 patients with CFS (Fukuda criteria). Participants completed the following screening symptom assessment tools: Chalder Fatigue Scale, Fatigue Impact Scale, Fatigue Severity Scale, Epworth Sleepiness Scales, the self-reported Composite Autonomic Symptom Scale. Autonomic parameters were measured at rest with a Task Force Monitor (CNS Systems) and arterial stiffness using an Arteriograph (TensioMed Kft.). Principal axis factor analysis yielded four factors: fatigue, subjective and objective autonomic dysfunction and arterial stiffness. Using cluster analyses, these factors were grouped in four autonomic profiles: 34% of patients had sympathetic symptoms with dysautonomia, 5% sympathetic alone, 21% parasympathetic and 40% had issues with sympathovagal balance. Those with a sympathetic-dysautonomia phenotype were associated with more severe disease, reported greater subjective autonomic symptoms with sympathetic over-modulation and had the lowest quality of life. The highest quality of life was observed in the balance subtype where subjects were the youngest, had lower levels of fatigue and the lowest values for arterial stiffness. Future studies will aim to design autonomic profile-specific treatment interventions to determine links between autonomic phenotypes CFS and a specific treatment.
在本研究中,我们着手确定慢性疲劳综合征(CFS)患者自主神经亚组的特征。该研究纳入了131例符合福田标准的CFS患者。参与者完成了以下筛查症状评估工具:查尔德疲劳量表、疲劳影响量表、疲劳严重程度量表、爱泼华嗜睡量表、自我报告的综合自主神经症状量表。使用任务力监测仪(CNS系统)在静息状态下测量自主神经参数,并使用动脉造影仪(TensioMed Kft.)测量动脉僵硬度。主成分因子分析得出四个因子:疲劳、主观和客观自主神经功能障碍以及动脉僵硬度。通过聚类分析,这些因子被归为四种自主神经特征类型:34%的患者有伴有自主神经功能障碍的交感神经症状,5%仅有交感神经症状,21%有副交感神经症状,40%的患者存在交感迷走神经平衡问题。具有交感神经 - 自主神经功能障碍表型的患者与更严重的疾病相关,报告有更多因交感神经过度调节导致的主观自主神经症状,且生活质量最低。在平衡亚型中观察到最高的生活质量,该亚型的受试者最年轻,疲劳程度较低,动脉僵硬度值也最低。未来的研究旨在设计针对特定自主神经特征类型的治疗干预措施,以确定CFS自主神经表型与特定治疗之间的联系。