van Leeuwen Ninke, Bossema Ercolie R, Knoop Hans, Kruize Aike A, Bootsma Hendrika, Bijlsma Johannes W J, Geenen Rinie
Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Utrecht University, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Expert Centre for Chronic Fatigue, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen and Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Utrecht University, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Expert Centre for Chronic Fatigue, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen and Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Utrecht University, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Expert Centre for Chronic Fatigue, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen and Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2015 May;54(5):776-83. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keu387. Epub 2014 Oct 6.
Fatigue is a highly prevalent and debilitating symptom in the autoimmune disease SS. Although the disease process plays a role in fatigue, psychological factors may influence fatigue and the ability to deal with its consequences. Profiles of co-occurring psychological factors may suggest potential targets for the treatment of fatigue. The aim of this study was to identify psychological profiles in patients with SS and the accompanying levels of fatigue.
Three hundred patients with primary SS (mean age 57 years, 93% female) completed questionnaires on fatigue (multidimensional fatigue inventory), physical activity cognitions (TAMPA-SK), illness cognitions, cognitive regulation, emotion processing and regulation [Toronto Alexithymia Scale 20, Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ), Berkeley Expressivity Questionnaire], coping strategies (Brief COPE) and social support.
Principal axis factor analysis (oblimin rotation) yielded six psychological factors: social support, negative thinking, positive thinking, emotional expressivity, avoidance and alexithymia (i.e. the inability to differentiate emotions). Using cluster analyses, these factors were grouped in four psychological profiles: functional (39%), alexithymic (27%), self-reliant (23%) and dysfunctional (11%). Irrespective of the psychological profile, the level of fatigue was substantially higher in patients than in the general population. Patients with a dysfunctional or an alexithymic profile reported more fatigue than those with a self-reliant profile.
Our study in SS yielded four psychological profiles that were differentially associated with fatigue. These profiles can be used to examine determinants and prognosis of fatigue as well as the possibility of customizing cognitive behavioural interventions for chronic fatigue.
疲劳是自身免疫性疾病干燥综合征(SS)中一种非常普遍且使人衰弱的症状。尽管疾病进程在疲劳中起作用,但心理因素可能会影响疲劳以及应对其后果的能力。同时出现的心理因素概况可能提示疲劳治疗的潜在靶点。本研究的目的是确定干燥综合征患者的心理概况以及伴随的疲劳水平。
300例原发性干燥综合征患者(平均年龄57岁,93%为女性)完成了关于疲劳(多维疲劳量表)、身体活动认知(坦帕运动技能问卷)、疾病认知、认知调节、情绪处理与调节[多伦多述情障碍量表20、情绪调节问卷(ERQ)、伯克利表达性问卷]、应对策略(简易应对方式问卷)和社会支持的问卷调查。
主轴因子分析(斜交旋转)产生了六个心理因素:社会支持、消极思维、积极思维、情绪表达、回避和述情障碍(即无法区分情绪)。使用聚类分析,这些因素被分为四种心理概况:功能型(39%)、述情障碍型(27%)、自力更生型(23%)和功能失调型(11%)。无论心理概况如何,患者的疲劳水平均显著高于一般人群。功能失调型或述情障碍型患者报告的疲劳比自力更生型患者更多。
我们对干燥综合征患者的研究得出了四种与疲劳有不同关联的心理概况。这些概况可用于检查疲劳的决定因素和预后,以及为慢性疲劳定制认知行为干预措施的可能性。