• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

注视侧向面孔刺激的行为在自闭症谱系障碍诊断为和不为的婴儿中。

Gaze behaviour to lateral face stimuli in infants who do and do not gain an ASD diagnosis.

机构信息

Department of Psychological Sciences, School of Science, Birkbeck, University of London, Malet Street, London, WC1E 7HX, UK.

Psychology Department, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EC1V 0HB, UK.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 6;10(1):13185. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69898-9.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-69898-9
PMID:32764733
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7411063/
Abstract

Cerebral lateralisation of function is common characteristic across vertebrate species and is positively associated with fitness of the organism, in humans we hypothesise that it is associated with cognitive fitness. This investigation evaluated the early development of lateralised gaze behaviour for face stimuli in infants at high and low risk for autism from the British Autism Sibling Infant Study (BASIS). The BASIS cohort includes a low risk group and three high-risk groups who at age 3 were developing (i) typically, (ii) atypically or (iii) had received a diagnosis for ASD. Using eye-tracking data derived from a face pop-out task at 6 and 14 months of age, all non-ASD groups showed a bias for stimuli on the left at both timepoints. At 6 months the ASD group demonstrated a preference for stimuli on the right and were slower than their neurotypical counterparts to look at faces on the left. However, by 14 months these differences disappear. Longitudinal associations between lateral looking behaviour at 6 months and language and motor ability at 14 months were also found. Results suggest that infants who go on to be diagnosed with autism exhibit early differences in gaze behaviour that may be associated with subsequent cognitive outcomes.

摘要

功能的大脑偏侧化是脊椎动物物种的共同特征,与生物体的适应性呈正相关,我们假设在人类中,它与认知适应性有关。本研究评估了来自英国自闭症兄弟姐妹婴儿研究(BASIS)的高风险和低风险自闭症婴儿早期对面部刺激的侧化注视行为的发展。BASIS 队列包括一个低风险组和三个高风险组,这些高风险组在 3 岁时分别表现为(i)典型发育、(ii)非典型发育或(iii)被诊断为自闭症谱系障碍。使用从 6 个月和 14 个月大的面孔突出任务中得出的眼动追踪数据,所有非自闭症组在两个时间点都表现出对左侧刺激的偏向。在 6 个月时,自闭症组表现出对右侧刺激的偏好,并且比他们的神经典型对照组更慢地看左侧的面孔。然而,到 14 个月时,这些差异消失了。还发现了 6 个月时的侧视行为与 14 个月时的语言和运动能力之间的纵向关联。结果表明,被诊断为自闭症的婴儿表现出早期注视行为的差异,这可能与随后的认知结果有关。

相似文献

1
Gaze behaviour to lateral face stimuli in infants who do and do not gain an ASD diagnosis.注视侧向面孔刺激的行为在自闭症谱系障碍诊断为和不为的婴儿中。
Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 6;10(1):13185. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69898-9.
2
Gazefinder as a clinical supplementary tool for discriminating between autism spectrum disorder and typical development in male adolescents and adults.凝视发现仪作为一种临床辅助工具,用于区分男性青少年和成年人的自闭症谱系障碍与正常发育情况。
Mol Autism. 2016 Mar 23;7:19. doi: 10.1186/s13229-016-0083-y. eCollection 2016.
3
A functional but atypical self: Influence of self-relevant processing on the gaze cueing effect in autism spectrum disorder.一种功能性但非典型的自我:自我相关加工对自闭症谱系障碍中注视线索效应的影响。
Autism Res. 2018 Nov;11(11):1522-1531. doi: 10.1002/aur.2019. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
4
Shifting Preferences for Primate Faces in Neurotypical Infants and Infants Later Diagnosed With ASD.Neurotypical 婴儿和后来被诊断为 ASD 的婴儿对灵长类面孔的偏好变化。
Autism Res. 2019 Feb;12(2):249-262. doi: 10.1002/aur.2043. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
5
Facetime vs. Screentime: Gaze Patterns to Live and Video Social Stimuli in Adolescents with ASD.面对面交流时间与屏幕时间:自闭症青少年的注视模式与视频社交刺激。
Sci Rep. 2019 Sep 2;9(1):12643. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49039-7.
6
Initiating joint attention use in infants at high-risk for autism spectrum disorder.启动自闭症谱系障碍高风险婴儿的共同注意使用。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2018 Oct;62(10):842-853. doi: 10.1111/jir.12539. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
7
Visual attention to faces in children with autism spectrum disorder: are there sex differences?自闭症谱系障碍儿童的面孔视觉注意:是否存在性别差异?
Mol Autism. 2019 Jun 28;10:28. doi: 10.1186/s13229-019-0276-2. eCollection 2019.
8
Atypical hemispheric specialization for faces in infants at risk for autism spectrum disorder.自闭症谱系障碍高危婴儿面部的非典型半球特化。
Autism Res. 2015 Apr;8(2):187-98. doi: 10.1002/aur.1438. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
9
Altered gaze following during live interaction in infants at risk for autism: an eye tracking study.自闭症高危婴儿在实时互动中的注视跟随变化:一项眼动追踪研究。
Mol Autism. 2016 Jan 26;7:12. doi: 10.1186/s13229-016-0069-9. eCollection 2016.
10
Investigating Gaze Behaviour of Children Diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorders in a Classroom Setting.在课堂环境中调查被诊断为自闭症谱系障碍的儿童的注视行为。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2021 Dec;51(12):4663-4678. doi: 10.1007/s10803-021-04906-z. Epub 2021 Feb 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Motor-sensory biases are associated with cognitive and social abilities in humans.运动感知偏差与人类的认知和社会能力有关。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 2;14(1):14724. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64372-2.
2
Outcome measures in Angelman syndrome.Angelman 综合征的疗效评估。
J Neurodev Disord. 2024 Mar 1;16(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s11689-024-09516-1.
3
Valproic acid exposure affects social visual lateralization and asymmetric gene expression in zebrafish larvae.丙戊酸暴露影响斑马鱼幼鱼的社交视觉侧化和不对称基因表达。

本文引用的文献

1
A function for the bicameral mind.双峰心智的一种功能。
Cortex. 2020 Mar;124:274-285. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.11.018. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
2
Cortical route for facelike pattern processing in human newborns.人类新生儿对面部模式处理的皮质途径。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Mar 5;116(10):4625-4630. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1812419116. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
3
Sensorimotor lateralization scaffolds cognitive specialization.感觉运动侧化构建认知专业化。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 23;14(1):4474. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54356-7.
4
Left visual field bias during face perception aligns with individual differences in reading skills and is absent in dyslexia.面部感知过程中的左视野偏向与阅读技能的个体差异相关,而在阅读障碍中不存在这种偏向。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2025 Jun;95(2):270-279. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12559. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
5
Investigation of Eye-Tracking Scan Path as a Biomarker for Autism Screening Using Machine Learning Algorithms.利用机器学习算法将眼动扫描路径作为自闭症筛查生物标志物的研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Feb 17;12(2):518. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020518.
6
Social gaze in preterm infants may act as an early indicator of atypical lateralization.早产儿的社交注视可能是其非典型侧化的早期指标。
Child Dev. 2022 Jul;93(4):869-880. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13734. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
7
Evolution and function of neurocognitive systems in non-human animals.非人类动物的神经认知系统的进化与功能。
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 8;11(1):23487. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02736-8.
8
Abnormal visual attention to simple social stimuli in 4-month-old infants at high risk for Autism.高自闭症风险婴儿在 4 个月大时对简单社会刺激的异常视觉注意力。
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 4;11(1):15785. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95418-4.
9
Evolutionary motor biases and cognition in children with and without autism.自闭症儿童与非自闭症儿童的进化运动偏差和认知。
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 15;10(1):17385. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74224-4.
Prog Brain Res. 2018;238:405-433. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
4
Atypical structural and functional motor networks in autism.自闭症中异常的结构和功能运动网络。
Prog Brain Res. 2018;238:207-248. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2018.06.010. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
5
The left cradling bias: An evolutionary facilitator of social cognition?左抱偏爱:社会认知的进化促进因素?
Cortex. 2019 Sep;118:116-131. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.05.011. Epub 2018 May 21.
6
Toddler hand preference trajectories predict 3-year language outcome.幼儿的手偏好轨迹可预测3岁时的语言能力结果。
Dev Psychobiol. 2017 Nov;59(7):876-887. doi: 10.1002/dev.21560. Epub 2017 Sep 9.
7
Atypical lateralization of motor circuit functional connectivity in children with autism is associated with motor deficits.自闭症儿童运动回路功能连接的非典型偏侧化与运动缺陷有关。
Mol Autism. 2016 Jul 14;7:35. doi: 10.1186/s13229-016-0096-6. eCollection 2016.
8
Infant Hand Preference and the Development of Cognitive Abilities.婴儿的手偏好与认知能力的发展
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 23;7:410. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00410. eCollection 2016.
9
Brain asymmetry (animal).脑偏侧性(动物)。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2011 Mar;2(2):146-157. doi: 10.1002/wcs.100. Epub 2010 Jul 21.
10
Cradling bias is absent in children with autism spectrum disorders.自闭症谱系障碍儿童不存在抱持偏见。
J Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2013;25(1):55-60. doi: 10.2989/17280583.2013.767262.