• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

面对面交流时间与屏幕时间:自闭症青少年的注视模式与视频社交刺激。

Facetime vs. Screentime: Gaze Patterns to Live and Video Social Stimuli in Adolescents with ASD.

机构信息

Emerson College, Boston, USA.

Brandeis University, Waltham, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2019 Sep 2;9(1):12643. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49039-7.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-49039-7
PMID:31477756
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6718422/
Abstract

Atypical eye gaze to social stimuli is one of the most frequently reported and studied social behaviors affected by autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The vast majority of this literature is based on analyses of gaze patterns as participants view social information, such as talking faces, on a computer screen. However, recent results suggest that generalizing gaze behaviors from computer screens to live interactions may not be valid. This study examines between- and within-group differences in gaze behaviors of children with ASD and their neurotypical (NT) peers during a screen-based and a live-interaction task. Results show between-group differences in gaze only for the screen-based, but not the live-interaction task. We also find that gaze behavior of NT children during the screen-based task significantly correlates with their gaze behavior during the live interaction; individuals who direct a higher percentage of gaze to the face in one task also did so in the other task. However, there is no significant relationship between the gaze patterns of children with ASD for those two tasks. These results strongly caution against using gaze of individuals with ASD recorded during screen-based tasks as a proxy for understanding their gaze behavior during live social interactions.

摘要

对社会刺激的非典型注视是自闭症谱系障碍 (ASD) 最常被报道和研究的社会行为之一。这方面的文献绝大多数都是基于参与者在计算机屏幕上观看社交信息(如说话的面孔)时的注视模式分析得出的。然而,最近的研究结果表明,将从计算机屏幕上得出的注视行为推广到真实的互动中可能并不成立。本研究考察了 ASD 儿童及其神经典型(NT)同龄人在基于屏幕和真实互动任务中的注视行为的组间和组内差异。结果表明,只有在基于屏幕的任务中存在组间差异,而在真实互动任务中则没有。我们还发现,NT 儿童在基于屏幕的任务中的注视行为与他们在真实互动中的注视行为显著相关;在一个任务中注视面部的比例较高的个体在另一个任务中也会这样做。然而,ASD 儿童在这两个任务中的注视模式之间没有显著关系。这些结果强烈警告人们不要将在基于屏幕的任务中记录的 ASD 个体的注视行为作为理解他们在真实社交互动中的注视行为的替代物。

相似文献

1
Facetime vs. Screentime: Gaze Patterns to Live and Video Social Stimuli in Adolescents with ASD.面对面交流时间与屏幕时间:自闭症青少年的注视模式与视频社交刺激。
Sci Rep. 2019 Sep 2;9(1):12643. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49039-7.
2
Does decreased visual attention to faces underlie difficulties interpreting eye gaze cues in autism?自闭症患者在解读眼神线索时存在困难,这是否与他们对面部视觉注意力的减少有关?
Mol Autism. 2020 Jul 21;11(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s13229-020-00361-2.
3
Gazefinder as a clinical supplementary tool for discriminating between autism spectrum disorder and typical development in male adolescents and adults.凝视发现仪作为一种临床辅助工具,用于区分男性青少年和成年人的自闭症谱系障碍与正常发育情况。
Mol Autism. 2016 Mar 23;7:19. doi: 10.1186/s13229-016-0083-y. eCollection 2016.
4
A functional but atypical self: Influence of self-relevant processing on the gaze cueing effect in autism spectrum disorder.一种功能性但非典型的自我:自我相关加工对自闭症谱系障碍中注视线索效应的影响。
Autism Res. 2018 Nov;11(11):1522-1531. doi: 10.1002/aur.2019. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
5
Measuring social attention and motivation in autism spectrum disorder using eye-tracking: Stimulus type matters.使用眼动追踪技术测量自闭症谱系障碍中的社会注意力和动机:刺激类型很重要。
Autism Res. 2015 Oct;8(5):620-8. doi: 10.1002/aur.1479. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
6
Visual attention to faces in children with autism spectrum disorder: are there sex differences?自闭症谱系障碍儿童的面孔视觉注意:是否存在性别差异?
Mol Autism. 2019 Jun 28;10:28. doi: 10.1186/s13229-019-0276-2. eCollection 2019.
7
Promoting social attention in 3-year-olds with ASD through gaze-contingent eye tracking.通过注视相关眼动追踪促进 ASD 儿童的社会关注。
Autism Res. 2020 Jan;13(1):61-73. doi: 10.1002/aur.2199. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
8
Combined frequency-tagging EEG and eye-tracking measures provide no support for the "excess mouth/diminished eye attention" hypothesis in autism.联合频率标记 EEG 和眼动追踪测量结果并不支持自闭症中“过度口腔/减弱眼部注意力”假说。
Mol Autism. 2020 Nov 23;11(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s13229-020-00396-5.
9
Spontaneous gaze selection and following during naturalistic social interactions in school-aged children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder.自闭症谱系障碍学龄儿童和青少年在自然主义社交互动中的自发注视选择与追随
Can J Exp Psychol. 2017 Sep;71(3):243-257. doi: 10.1037/cep0000131. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
10
Atypical physiological orienting to direct gaze in low-functioning children with autism spectrum disorder.自闭症谱系障碍低功能儿童对直接注视的非典型生理定向。
Autism Res. 2017 May;10(5):810-820. doi: 10.1002/aur.1738. Epub 2017 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Social attention in the wild - fixations to the eyes and autistic traits during a naturalistic interaction in a healthy sample.野外的社会注意力——健康样本在自然互动过程中对眼睛的注视及自闭症特征
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 3;14(1):30102. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-79210-8.
2
Gaze behavior in response to affect during natural social interactions.自然社交互动中对情感的注视行为。
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 14;15:1433483. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1433483. eCollection 2024.
3
The robustness of individual differences in gaze preferences toward faces and eyes across face-to-face experimental designs and its relation to social anxiety.

本文引用的文献

1
Gaze allocation in face-to-face communication is affected primarily by task structure and social context, not stimulus-driven factors.在面对面的交流中,注视分配主要受到任务结构和社会语境的影响,而不是由刺激驱动的因素。
Cognition. 2019 Mar;184:28-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.12.005. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
2
Studying "natural" eye movements in an "unnatural" social environment: The influence of social activity, framing, and sub-clinical traits on gaze aversion.在“非自然”的社会环境中研究“自然”的眼球运动:社交活动、框架设定和亚临床特征对目光回避的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Aug;72(8):1913-1925. doi: 10.1177/1747021818819094. Epub 2019 Jan 12.
3
个体在面对面实验设计中对视和眼神的偏好差异的稳健性及其与社交焦虑的关系。
J Vis. 2023 May 2;23(5):15. doi: 10.1167/jov.23.5.15.
4
Identifying phenotypic and physiological subgroups of preschoolers with autism spectrum disorder.鉴定自闭症谱系障碍学龄前儿童的表型和生理亚群。
Psychol Med. 2023 Mar;53(4):1592-1602. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721003172. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
5
Social attention patterns of autistic and non-autistic adults when viewing real versus reel people.自闭症和非自闭症成年人观看真实人物与虚构人物时的社会注意力模式。
Autism. 2023 Nov;27(8):2372-2383. doi: 10.1177/13623613231162156. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
6
I see you, you see me: the impact of social presence on social interaction processes in autistic and non-autistic people.我看见你,你看见我:社交存在对自闭症和非自闭症人群社交互动过程的影响。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Apr 24;378(1875):20210479. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0479. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
7
Cracking the Code of Live Human Social Interactions in Autism: A Review of the Eye-Tracking Literature.破解自闭症患者真实人类社交互动的密码:眼动追踪文献综述
Proc Mach Learn Res. 2021 Oct;173:242-264.
8
Mechanisms by which Early Eye Gaze to the Mouth During Multisensory Speech Influences Expressive Communication Development in Infant Siblings of Children with and without Autism.在多感官言语过程中早期眼部注视嘴巴的机制对有或无自闭症儿童的婴儿兄弟姐妹的表达性沟通发展的影响
Mind Brain Educ. 2022 Feb;16(1):62-74. doi: 10.1111/mbe.12310. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
9
Mobile Eye Tracking Captures Changes in Attention Over Time During a Naturalistic Threat Paradigm in Behaviorally Inhibited Children.移动眼动追踪捕捉行为抑制型儿童在自然主义威胁范式中随时间变化的注意力变化。
Affect Sci. 2021 Dec;2(4):495-505. doi: 10.1007/s42761-021-00077-3. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
10
How to choose the size of facial areas of interest in interactive eye tracking.如何选择交互式眼动追踪中感兴趣的面部区域大小。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 4;17(2):e0263594. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263594. eCollection 2022.
Does social presence or the potential for interaction reduce social gaze in online social scenarios? Introducing the "live lab" paradigm.
在在线社交场景中,社交临场感或互动可能性会减少社交凝视吗?引入“现场实验室”范式。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Apr;72(4):779-791. doi: 10.1177/1747021818772812. Epub 2018 May 11.
4
Social partner gaze direction and conversational phase; factors affecting social attention during face-to-face conversations in autistic adults?社交伙伴注视方向与对话阶段;自闭症成人面对面交谈时影响社交注意力的因素?
Autism. 2019 Feb;23(2):503-513. doi: 10.1177/1362361318756786. Epub 2018 Feb 11.
5
Are fixations in static natural scenes a useful predictor of attention in the real world?静态自然场景中的注视点能否有效预测现实世界中的注意力?
Can J Exp Psychol. 2017 Jun;71(2):172-181. doi: 10.1037/cep0000125.
6
Increased Eye Contact During Conversation Compared to Play in Children With Autism.与玩耍相比,自闭症儿童在对话时眼神交流增加。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2017 Mar;47(3):607-614. doi: 10.1007/s10803-016-2981-4.
7
Social attention in ASD: A review and meta-analysis of eye-tracking studies.自闭症谱系障碍中的社会注意力:眼动研究的综述与荟萃分析。
Res Dev Disabil. 2016 Jan;48:79-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2015.10.011. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
8
Brief Report: Patterns of Eye Movements in Face to Face Conversation are Associated with Autistic Traits: Evidence from a Student Sample.简短报告:面对面交谈中的眼动模式与自闭症特征相关:来自学生样本的证据。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2016 Jan;46(1):305-314. doi: 10.1007/s10803-015-2546-y.
9
Measuring social attention and motivation in autism spectrum disorder using eye-tracking: Stimulus type matters.使用眼动追踪技术测量自闭症谱系障碍中的社会注意力和动机:刺激类型很重要。
Autism Res. 2015 Oct;8(5):620-8. doi: 10.1002/aur.1479. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
10
The use of eye-tracking to explore social difficulties in cognitively able students with autism spectrum disorder: A pilot investigation.利用眼动追踪技术探究患有自闭症谱系障碍的认知能力正常学生的社交困难:一项初步调查。
Autism. 2015 Oct;19(7):868-73. doi: 10.1177/1362361315580767. Epub 2015 May 6.