Suppr超能文献

在牙科学院中放置铸造金和陶瓷嵌体的存活率:一项回顾性研究。

Survival of Cast Gold and Ceramic Onlays Placed in a School of Dentistry: A Retrospective Study.

机构信息

Advanced Education in Operative Dentistry and Biomaterials, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 385 S Columbia St, Brauer Hall, Room 429, Chapel Hill, NC.

Division of Comprehensive Oral Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

出版信息

J Prosthodont. 2020 Oct;29(8):693-698. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13233. Epub 2020 Aug 19.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study was done to compare the survival rates of cast gold and ceramic onlays placed in a dental school setting.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An electronic search was conducted in the patient records at Adams School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill for onlay codes that were in the database (From 1998 until 2018). Progress notes and radiographs were scrutinized to establish the survival time of the restorations. Any complications that occurred during the life time of the restorations were noted. The survival was summarized by categorization based on ranges of survival time in years; group 1: 1 to 5 years, group 2: 6 to 22 years. The mean survival time and standard deviation were calculated. One-way ANOVA was used to determine whether there was a statistically significant difference in the survival times between gold and ceramic onlays.

RESULTS

The mean survival rate of cast gold onlays (86.6%) was comparable to that of ceramic onlays (81.1%). The gold onlays in Group 1 had a higher mean survival time (2.43 years) than the ceramic onlays (2.03 years). This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.002). The ceramic onlays in Group 2 had a mean survival time of 19.75 years while gold onlays had a mean survival time of 17.63 years. This difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.91).

CONCLUSION

It was concluded that while the survival rate of ceramic onlays (81.1%) was inferior to that of cast gold onlays (86.6%), it was comparable.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较在牙科学院环境中放置铸造金嵌体和陶瓷嵌体的存活率。

材料和方法

在北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校亚当斯牙科学院的患者记录中进行了电子搜索,以获取数据库中的嵌体代码(1998 年至 2018 年)。审查进展记录和射线照片以确定修复体的存活时间。记录修复体寿命期间发生的任何并发症。根据存活时间的范围(1 至 5 年为组 1,6 至 22 年为组 2)对存活情况进行分类总结。计算平均存活时间和标准差。使用单因素方差分析确定金嵌体和陶瓷嵌体之间的存活时间是否存在统计学显著差异。

结果

铸造金嵌体(86.6%)的平均存活率与陶瓷嵌体(81.1%)相当。组 1 的金嵌体的平均存活时间(2.43 年)高于陶瓷嵌体(2.03 年)。这种差异具有统计学意义(p = 0.002)。组 2 的陶瓷嵌体的平均存活时间为 19.75 年,而金嵌体的平均存活时间为 17.63 年。这种差异无统计学意义(p = 0.91)。

结论

虽然陶瓷嵌体(81.1%)的存活率低于铸造金嵌体(86.6%),但两者相当。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验