Department of Ophthalmology, Eye Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences , Beijing, China.
Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine , Miami, FL, USA.
Curr Eye Res. 2021 Mar;46(3):341-349. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2020.1801756. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
The goal of the study was to determine the effect of different software versions on the measurement of retinal vessel densities using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in normal subjects.
Thirty-two eyes of eighteen healthy subjects were imaged using two OCTA devices: the Optovue RTVue and the Zeiss Cirrus. The macular 3 × 3 mm scan protocol was used. The images acquired using the Optovue OCTA device were exported using two different software versions in the system and compared to the images acquired through the Zeiss OCTA. In addition, the Optovue OCTA images were exported after manual adjustment of the segmentation boundaries according to the intraretinal layer definition. The densities of the superficial vascular plexus (SVP) and deep vascular plexus (DVP) were measured using fractal analysis by box-counting (Dbox).
Both the vessel densities of the SVP and DVP acquired using the Optovue OCTA device were significantly different when compared to those from the Zeiss OCTA device (all, <.05). No significant difference was found between the vessel densities of the SVP exported using both the new and old versions of Optovue ( >.05). However, the DVP exported using the new Optovue software version was significantly different compared to those exported using the old version ( <.05). The vessel densities of the SVP and DVP were related among the Optovue OCTA software versions and manual adjustment method (r ranged from 0.55 to 0.77; all <.05).
This is the first study to determine that different software versions with various intraretinal layer segmentation methods affect the vessel density measurements of the SVP and DVP.
本研究旨在确定不同软件版本对正常受试者的光学相干断层扫描血管造影(OCTA)视网膜血管密度测量的影响。
对 18 名健康受试者的 32 只眼进行了两种 OCTA 设备(Optovue RTVue 和 Zeiss Cirrus)的成像。使用黄斑 3×3mm 扫描方案。使用 Optovue OCTA 设备获取的图像使用系统中的两个不同软件版本导出,并与 Zeiss OCTA 获取的图像进行比较。此外,根据视网膜内部分层定义,手动调整分割边界后,导出 Optovue OCTA 图像。使用分形分析的盒子计数法(Dbox)测量浅层血管丛(SVP)和深层血管丛(DVP)的密度。
与 Zeiss OCTA 设备相比,Optovue OCTA 设备获取的 SVP 和 DVP 的血管密度均有显著差异(均<.05)。新旧版本 Optovue 导出的 SVP 血管密度无显著差异(>.05)。然而,与旧版 Optovue 软件相比,新版 Optovue 软件导出的 DVP 血管密度差异有统计学意义(<.05)。Optovue OCTA 软件版本和手动调整方法之间的 SVP 和 DVP 血管密度存在相关性(r 范围为 0.55 至 0.77;均<.05)。
这是第一项确定不同软件版本和各种视网膜内部分层分割方法会影响 SVP 和 DVP 血管密度测量的研究。