• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

质子治疗头颈部癌症患者模型选择的初步经验。

First experience with model-based selection of head and neck cancer patients for proton therapy.

机构信息

University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands.

University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Radiother Oncol. 2020 Oct;151:206-213. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.07.056. Epub 2020 Aug 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2020.07.056
PMID:32768508
Abstract

PURPOSE

In the Netherlands, head and neck cancer (HNC) patients qualify for intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) based on model-based selection (MBS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the first experience in MBS of HNC patients.

METHODS

Patients who were subjected to MBS (Jan 2018-Sep 2019) were evaluated. A VMAT plan was created for all patients with optimal sparing of organ at risks (OARs) in normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models for a number of toxicities. An IMPT plan was created only for those with NTCP difference (ΔNTCP) between VMAT and best-case scenario for proton (assuming 0 Gy dose for all OARs in IMPT plan) that exceeded any ΔNTCP-thresholds defined in Dutch National Indication Protocol. These patients qualified for a robust IMPT-plan creation with similar target doses and subsequent plan comparison.

RESULTS

Of 227 patients, 141 (62%) qualified for plan comparison, of which 80 (35%) were eventually selected for proton therapy. Most patients were selected based on the ΔNTCP for dysphagia-related toxicities. The selection rate was higher among patients with advanced disease, pharyngeal tumors, and/or baseline complaints. A significant reduction in all OAR doses and NTCP values was obtained with IMPT compared with VMAT in both selected and non-selected patients, but more pronounced in patients selected for protons.

CONCLUSION

Model-based selection of patients with HNC for proton therapy is clinically feasible. Approximately one third of HNC patients qualify for protons and these patients have the highest probability to benefit from protons in terms of toxicity prevention.

摘要

目的

在荷兰,头颈部癌症(HNC)患者有资格根据基于模型的选择(MBS)接受强度调制质子治疗(IMPT)。本研究的目的是评估 HNC 患者 MBS 的初步经验。

方法

评估了接受 MBS(2018 年 1 月至 2019 年 9 月)的患者。为所有患者创建了 VMAT 计划,并在正常组织并发症概率(NTCP)模型中为 OAR 进行了最佳保护,以实现多种毒性的优化。仅为那些 VMAT 和质子最佳情况之间的 NTCP 差异(ΔNTCP)超过荷兰国家指示协议中定义的任何 ΔNTCP 阈值的患者创建了 IMPT 计划(假设 IMPT 计划中所有 OAR 的剂量均为 0Gy)。这些患者有资格进行稳健的 IMPT 计划创建,并具有类似的靶剂量和随后的计划比较。

结果

在 227 名患者中,有 141 名(62%)有资格进行计划比较,其中 80 名(35%)最终选择进行质子治疗。大多数患者是根据与吞咽相关毒性的 ΔNTCP 进行选择的。在晚期疾病、咽肿瘤和/或基线投诉的患者中,选择率更高。与 VMAT 相比,IMPT 可显著降低所有 OAR 剂量和 NTCP 值,在选择和未选择的患者中均如此,但在选择质子治疗的患者中更为明显。

结论

对头颈部癌症患者进行质子治疗的基于模型的选择在临床上是可行的。大约三分之一的 HNC 患者有资格接受质子治疗,这些患者在预防毒性方面最有可能从质子治疗中受益。

相似文献

1
First experience with model-based selection of head and neck cancer patients for proton therapy.质子治疗头颈部癌症患者模型选择的初步经验。
Radiother Oncol. 2020 Oct;151:206-213. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.07.056. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
2
PTV-based VMAT vs. robust IMPT for head-and-neck cancer: A probabilistic uncertainty analysis of clinical plan evaluation with the Dutch model-based selection.基于 PTV 的容积旋转调强放疗(VMAT)与适形调强放疗(IMPT)对头颈部肿瘤的比较:应用荷兰基于模型选择的临床计划评估的概率不确定性分析。
Radiother Oncol. 2023 Sep;186:109729. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109729. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
3
Development of advanced preselection tools to reduce redundant plan comparisons in model-based selection of head and neck cancer patients for proton therapy.开发先进的预选工具,以减少在基于模型的头颈癌患者质子治疗选择中多余的计划比较。
Radiother Oncol. 2021 Jul;160:61-68. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.04.012. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
4
Spot scanning proton arc therapy reduces toxicity in oropharyngeal cancer patients.点扫描质子弧形治疗可降低口咽癌患者的毒性。
Med Phys. 2023 Mar;50(3):1305-1317. doi: 10.1002/mp.16098. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
5
NTCP reduction for advanced head and neck cancer patients using proton therapy for complete or sequential boost treatment versus photon therapy.对于晚期头颈癌患者,使用质子治疗进行完整或序贯增敏治疗与光子治疗相比时的正常组织并发症概率降低情况。
Acta Oncol. 2015;54(9):1658-64. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2015.1071920. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
6
Proton arc therapy increases the benefit of proton therapy for oropharyngeal cancer patients in the model based clinic.质子弧治疗提高了质子治疗在基于模型的临床中对口咽癌患者的获益。
Radiother Oncol. 2023 Jul;184:109670. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109670. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
7
A probabilistic evaluation of the Dutch robustness and model-based selection protocols for Head-and-Neck IMPT: A multi-institutional study.荷兰头颈部调强质子治疗的稳健性和基于模型的选择方案的概率评估:一项多机构研究。
Radiother Oncol. 2024 Oct;199:110441. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110441. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
8
Intensity modulated proton therapy compared to volumetric modulated arc therapy in the irradiation of young female patients with hodgkin's lymphoma. Assessment of risk of toxicity and secondary cancer induction.调强质子治疗与容积旋转调强弧形治疗在霍奇金淋巴瘤年轻女性患者放疗中的比较。毒性和继发癌症诱导风险评估。
Radiat Oncol. 2020 Jan 13;15(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-1462-2.
9
Evaluation of decentralised model-based selection of head and neck cancer patients for a proton treatment study. DAHANCA 35.评估基于去中心化模型选择头颈部癌症患者参加质子治疗研究。DAHANCA 35。
Radiother Oncol. 2024 Jan;190:109812. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109812. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
10
Treatment planning comparison for head and neck cancer between photon, proton, and combined proton-photon therapy - From a fixed beam line to an arc.头颈部癌症的光子、质子和质子-光子联合治疗计划比较 - 从固定束线到弧形。
Radiother Oncol. 2024 Jan;190:109973. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109973. Epub 2023 Oct 31.

引用本文的文献

1
NTCP-Based Prediction of Lung Sparing With IMPT in BC Patients and Implication of Patient Selection.基于NTCP的乳腺癌患者IMPT肺保护预测及患者选择的意义。
Int J Part Ther. 2025 Jun 24;17:101196. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpt.2025.101196. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
FAPI-positron emission tomography for radiotherapy in head and neck cancer: applications and future directions.头颈部癌放疗中的FAPI正电子发射断层扫描:应用与未来方向
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2025 Jun 5;35:100792. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2025.100792. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
Proton Therapy Patient Selection Methods and the Impact of COVID-19: A Cross-Sectional International Survey.
质子治疗患者选择方法及 COVID-19 的影响:一项横断面国际调查。
J Med Radiat Sci. 2025 Sep;72(3):333-340. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.885. Epub 2025 May 11.
4
Envisioning an Italian Head and Neck Proton Therapy Model-Based Selection: Challenge and Opportunity.设想基于意大利头颈质子治疗模式的选择:挑战与机遇。
Int J Part Ther. 2025 Mar 20;16:100745. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpt.2025.100745. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
The prognostic value of pathologic lymph node imaging using deep learning-based outcome prediction in oropharyngeal cancer patients.基于深度学习的结果预测对口咽癌患者进行病理淋巴结成像的预后价值。
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2025 Feb 14;33:100733. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2025.100733. eCollection 2025 Jan.
6
Neurocognitive function in lower grade glioma patients selected for proton radiotherapy: real-world data from a prospective cohort study.入选质子放疗的低级别胶质瘤患者的神经认知功能:一项前瞻性队列研究的真实世界数据。
J Neurooncol. 2025 May;173(1):147-156. doi: 10.1007/s11060-025-04973-7. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
7
Clinical Introduction of Stem Cell Sparing Radiotherapy to Reduce the Risk of Xerostomia in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer.保留干细胞放疗降低头颈癌患者口干风险的临床介绍
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Dec 23;16(24):4283. doi: 10.3390/cancers16244283.
8
Selection for proton radiotherapy of grade 1-3 glioma patients.1-3级胶质瘤患者质子放疗的选择
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2024 Aug 13;48:100836. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100836. eCollection 2024 Sep.
9
Dosimetric and NTCP analyses for selecting parotid gland cancer patients for proton therapy.用于选择腮腺癌患者进行质子治疗的剂量学和正常组织并发症概率分析。
Tumori. 2024 Aug;110(4):273-283. doi: 10.1177/03008916241252544. Epub 2024 May 21.
10
Proton Therapy in Breast Cancer: A Review of Potential Approaches for Patient Selection.质子治疗在乳腺癌中的应用:患者选择的潜在方法综述。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Jan-Dec;23:15330338241234788. doi: 10.1177/15330338241234788.