• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

质子弧治疗提高了质子治疗在基于模型的临床中对口咽癌患者的获益。

Proton arc therapy increases the benefit of proton therapy for oropharyngeal cancer patients in the model based clinic.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.

Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Radiother Oncol. 2023 Jul;184:109670. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109670. Epub 2023 Apr 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109670
PMID:37059337
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In the model-based approach, patients qualify for proton therapy when the reduction in risk of toxicity (ΔNTCP) obtained with IMPT relative to VMAT is larger than predefined thresholds as defined by the Dutch National Indication Protocol (NIPP). Proton arc therapy (PAT) is an emerging technology which has the potential to further decrease NTCPs compared to IMPT. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential impact of PAT on the number of oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) patients that qualify for proton therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective cohort of 223 OPC patients subjected to the model-based selection procedure was investigated. 33 (15%) patients were considered unsuitable for proton treatment before plan comparison. When IMPT was compared to VMAT for the remaining 190 patients, 148 (66%) patients qualified for protons and 42 (19%) patients did not. For these 42 patients treated with VMAT, robust PAT plans were generated.

RESULTS

PAT plans provided better or similar target coverage compared to IMPT plans. In the PAT plans, integral dose was significantly reduced by 18% relative to IMPT plans and by 54% relative to VMAT plans. PAT decreased the mean dose to numerous organs-at-risk (OARs), further reducing NTCPs. The ΔNTCP for PAT relative to VMAT passed the NIPP thresholds for 32 out of the 42 patients treated with VMAT, resulting in 180 patients (81%) of the complete cohort qualifying for protons.

CONCLUSION

PAT outperforms IMPT and VMAT, leading to a further reduction of NTCP-values and higher ΔNTCP-values, significantly increasing the percentage of OPC patients selected for proton therapy.

摘要

背景与目的

在基于模型的方法中,当与 VMAT 相比,调强质子治疗(IMPT)所获得的毒性风险降低(ΔNTCP)大于荷兰国家适应证协议(NIPP)定义的预定阈值时,患者有资格接受质子治疗。质子弧治疗(PAT)是一种新兴技术,与 IMPT 相比,它有可能进一步降低 NTCP 值。本研究旨在探讨 PAT 对有资格接受质子治疗的口咽癌(OPC)患者数量的潜在影响。

材料与方法

研究了 223 例接受基于模型选择程序的 OPC 患者的前瞻性队列。在计划比较之前,有 33 例(15%)患者被认为不适合质子治疗。当对剩余的 190 例患者进行 IMPT 与 VMAT 比较时,有 148 例(66%)患者有资格接受质子治疗,42 例(19%)患者没有。对于这 42 例接受 VMAT 治疗的患者,生成了稳健的 PAT 计划。

结果

与 IMPT 计划相比,PAT 计划提供了更好或相似的靶区覆盖。在 PAT 计划中,与 IMPT 计划相比,积分剂量显著降低了 18%,与 VMAT 计划相比,降低了 54%。PAT 降低了许多危及器官(OAR)的平均剂量,进一步降低了 NTCP 值。与 VMAT 相比,PAT 的 ΔNTCP 值在接受 VMAT 治疗的 42 例患者中有 32 例超过了 NIPP 阈值,这导致整个队列中有 180 例(81%)患者有资格接受质子治疗。

结论

PAT 优于 IMPT 和 VMAT,导致 NTCP 值进一步降低,ΔNTCP 值显著增加,从而显著增加了选择接受质子治疗的 OPC 患者的比例。

相似文献

1
Proton arc therapy increases the benefit of proton therapy for oropharyngeal cancer patients in the model based clinic.质子弧治疗提高了质子治疗在基于模型的临床中对口咽癌患者的获益。
Radiother Oncol. 2023 Jul;184:109670. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109670. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
2
Early generation dynamic and static proton arc treatment planning algorithms assessment in oropharyngeal cancer patients.早期一代动态和静态质子弧形治疗计划算法在口咽癌患者中的评估
Med Phys. 2025 Jul;52(7):e17916. doi: 10.1002/mp.17916.
3
Gantry-based pencil beam scanning proton therapy for uveal melanoma: IMPT versus proton arc therapy.基于龙门架的笔形束扫描质子治疗葡萄膜黑色素瘤:调强质子治疗与质子弧形治疗对比
Radiat Oncol. 2025 Apr 2;20(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13014-025-02621-y.
4
Volumetric modulated arc therapy versus intensity-modulated proton therapy in the postoperative irradiation of thymoma.容积调强弧形治疗与强度调制质子治疗胸腺瘤术后放疗的比较
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep;146(9):2267-2276. doi: 10.1007/s00432-020-03281-z. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
5
Spot scanning proton arc therapy reduces toxicity in oropharyngeal cancer patients.点扫描质子弧形治疗可降低口咽癌患者的毒性。
Med Phys. 2023 Mar;50(3):1305-1317. doi: 10.1002/mp.16098. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
6
The Cut-Sort-Group algorithm for efficient delivery of collimated step-and-shoot proton arc therapy.用于高效递送准直步进式质子弧形治疗的切割-排序-分组算法。
Med Phys. 2025 Jul;52(7):e17889. doi: 10.1002/mp.17889. Epub 2025 May 19.
7
Assessment of intra-fractional and inter-fractional motion in esophageal cancer treated with intensity-modulated proton therapy.调强质子治疗食管癌过程中分次内及分次间运动的评估
BMC Cancer. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):1112. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14504-2.
8
Effectiveness of Intensity Modulate Proton Therapy in Managing Complex Multiple Meningiomas: A Dosimetric and Radiobiological Comparative Study with Helical Tomotherapy on Neurological Risk.调强质子治疗在处理复杂多发脑膜瘤中的有效性:与螺旋断层放疗在神经学风险方面的剂量学和放射生物学对比研究
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2025 Aug;44:103877. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2025.103877. Epub 2025 May 26.
9
In Silico Interim Adaptation of Proton Therapy in Head and Neck Cancer by Simultaneous Dose and Linear Energy Transfer Escalation.通过同时增加剂量和线性能量传递对头颈部癌质子治疗进行计算机模拟临时适应性调整
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2025 Aug 1;122(5):1369-1379. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.02.015. Epub 2025 Feb 22.
10
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Shoot-through layers in upright proton arcs unlock advantages in plan quality and range verification.直立质子弧形射束穿透层在计划质量和射程验证方面具有优势。
Med Phys. 2025 Sep;52(9):e18051. doi: 10.1002/mp.18051.
2
Comparison of stereotactic photon and proton treatment plans for metastasis-directed radiotherapy.立体定向光子和质子治疗计划用于转移灶定向放射治疗的比较。
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2025 Jul 5;35:100808. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2025.100808. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
Early generation dynamic and static proton arc treatment planning algorithms assessment in oropharyngeal cancer patients.
早期一代动态和静态质子弧形治疗计划算法在口咽癌患者中的评估
Med Phys. 2025 Jul;52(7):e17916. doi: 10.1002/mp.17916.
4
Dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated proton therapy and proton arc therapy for pediatric ependymoma.儿童室管膜瘤调强质子治疗与质子弧形治疗的剂量学比较
Acta Oncol. 2025 May 12;64:654-660. doi: 10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42001.
5
Gantry-based pencil beam scanning proton therapy for uveal melanoma: IMPT versus proton arc therapy.基于龙门架的笔形束扫描质子治疗葡萄膜黑色素瘤:调强质子治疗与质子弧形治疗对比
Radiat Oncol. 2025 Apr 2;20(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13014-025-02621-y.
6
Pediatric CNS Radiation Oncology: Recent Developments and Novel Techniques.小儿中枢神经系统放射肿瘤学:最新进展与新技术
Curr Oncol. 2025 Mar 20;32(3):180. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32030180.
7
Towards faster plan adaptation for proton arc therapy using initial treatment plan information.利用初始治疗计划信息实现质子弧形治疗更快的计划适配。
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2025 Jan 30;33:100705. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2025.100705. eCollection 2025 Jan.
8
Static proton arc therapy: Comprehensive plan quality evaluation and first clinical treatments in patients with complex head and neck targets.静态质子弧形治疗:复杂头颈部靶区患者的综合计划质量评估及首次临床治疗
Med Phys. 2025 May;52(5):3191-3203. doi: 10.1002/mp.17669. Epub 2025 Feb 12.
9
Clinical Introduction of Stem Cell Sparing Radiotherapy to Reduce the Risk of Xerostomia in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer.保留干细胞放疗降低头颈癌患者口干风险的临床介绍
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Dec 23;16(24):4283. doi: 10.3390/cancers16244283.
10
Partial and full arc with DynamicARC technique in pencil beam scanning proton therapy for bilateral head and neck cancer: A feasibility and dosimetric study.在笔形束扫描质子治疗双侧头颈癌中使用动态弧形技术的部分和全弧:一项可行性和剂量学研究。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2025 Apr;26(4):e14611. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14611. Epub 2024 Dec 20.