A. Schwartz is the Michael Reese Endowed Professor and interim head, Department of Medical Education, and research professor, Department of Pediatrics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, and network director, Association of Pediatric Program Directors Longitudinal Educational Assessment Research Network, MacLean, Virginia; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3809-6637.
B. King is project manager, Association of Pediatric Program Directors Longitudinal Educational Assessment Research Network, McLean, Virginia.
Acad Med. 2020 Nov;95(11S Association of American Medical Colleges Learn Serve Lead: Proceedings of the 59th Annual Research in Medical Education Presentations):S12-S13. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003641.
Educational research networks leverage shared goals and common infrastructure to overcome traditional barriers to medical education research, including small sample sizes, lack of generalizability, need for expertise in statistical analysis, and limitations on data sharing. The diversity of extant network models today is exciting and provides a set of common options and challenges that newly emerging networks can expect. These include decisions about network focus, organization of data, sampling strategies, funding, and governance. Common challenges include managing authorship, human subjects protection rules, data use agreements, and statistical disclosure control. Medical education research networks both advance the field and develop the researchers who participate in them. The authors repeat the call that they and others have made for the development of networks to promulgate best practices and coordinate multinetwork (multinational, multispecialty, and cross-curriculum) studies.
教育研究网络利用共同的目标和通用的基础设施来克服医学教育研究中的传统障碍,包括样本量小、缺乏普遍性、对统计分析专业知识的需求以及数据共享的限制。如今,现有的网络模式的多样性令人兴奋,为新出现的网络提供了一系列共同的选择和挑战。这些选择和挑战包括网络重点、数据组织、抽样策略、资金和治理方面的决策。共同的挑战包括管理作者身份、保护人类受试者的规则、数据使用协议和统计披露控制。医学教育研究网络既推进了该领域的发展,也培养了参与其中的研究人员。作者再次呼吁他们和其他人开发网络,以推广最佳实践并协调多网络(跨国、多专业和跨课程)研究。