• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Family Members' Experience of Discussions on End-of-Life Care in Nursing Homes in Japan: A Qualitative Descriptive Study of Family Members' Narratives.家庭成员在日本养老院参与临终关怀讨论的体验:对家庭成员叙述的定性描述性研究。
J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2020 Oct;22(5):401-406. doi: 10.1097/NJH.0000000000000677.
2
Goals of Care or Goals of Trust? How Family Members Perceive Goals for Dying Nursing Home Residents.护理目标还是信任目标?家庭成员如何看待临终养老院居民的目标。
J Palliat Med. 2017 Apr;20(4):360-365. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2016.0271. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
3
Family members' prioritisation of care in residential aged care facilities: A case for individualised care.家庭成员在养老院中的优先护理选择:个性化护理的案例。
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Sep;29(17-18):3272-3285. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15352. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
4
End-of-life care in a nursing home: a study of family, nurse and healthcare aide perspectives.养老院中的临终关怀:一项关于家属、护士及医护助理观点的研究。
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2005 May;11(5):226-32. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2005.11.5.226.
5
Conversations about End of Life: Perspectives of Nursing Home Residents, Family, and Staff.关于临终关怀的对话:养老院居民、家属及工作人员的观点
J Palliat Med. 2015 May;18(5):421-8. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2014.0316. Epub 2015 Feb 6.
6
Meaningful connections in dementia end of life care in long term care homes.长期护理院痴呆症临终关怀中的有意义联系。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Sep 24;18(1):307. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1882-9.
7
Nursing home residents' perspectives on their social relationships.养老院居民对其社会关系的看法。
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Apr;29(7-8):1162-1174. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15174. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
8
Family Members' Experience With Hospice in Nursing Homes.家庭成员在养老院接受临终关怀的经历。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2016 May;33(4):354-62. doi: 10.1177/1049909114560213. Epub 2014 Nov 23.
9
They know!-Do they? A qualitative study of residents and relatives views on advance care planning, end-of-life care, and decision-making in nursing homes.他们知道!——他们真的知道吗?一项关于养老院居民及亲属对预立医疗照护计划、临终关怀和决策看法的定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2016 May;30(5):456-70. doi: 10.1177/0269216315605753. Epub 2015 Sep 22.
10
A qualitative study of family members' perspectives regarding decision-making for nursing home residents' care.一项关于家庭成员对养老院居民护理决策看法的定性研究。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2024 Dec;19(1):2370545. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2024.2370545. Epub 2024 Jun 21.

引用本文的文献

1
"You Want to Shield Your Kids": Patients' and Their Adult-Children's Serious Illness Conversations.“你想保护你的孩子”:患者及其成年子女关于重病的对话
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2025 May;69(5):435-443.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.12.014. Epub 2024 Dec 25.
2
The role of acculturation in the process of advance care planning among Chinese immigrants: A narrative systematic review.文化适应在华裔移民预先医疗照护计划过程中的作用:一个叙述性系统综述。
Palliat Med. 2023 Sep;37(8):1063-1078. doi: 10.1177/02692163231179255. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
3
Role of patients' family members in end-of-life communication: an integrative review.患者家属在临终沟通中的作用:综合述评。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 21;13(2):e067304. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067304.

本文引用的文献

1
Relational autonomy: what does it mean and how is it used in end-of-life care? A systematic review of argument-based ethics literature.关系自主性:它是什么意思,以及它如何在临终关怀中使用?基于论点的伦理学文献的系统综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Oct 26;20(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0417-3.
2
Advance care planning with chronically ill patients: A relational autonomy approach.与慢性病患者一起进行预先医疗照护计划:关系自主方法。
Nurs Ethics. 2020 Mar;27(2):360-371. doi: 10.1177/0969733019848031. Epub 2019 May 23.
3
Good end-of-life care in nursing home according to the family carers' perspective: A systematic review of qualitative findings.从家庭照顾者的角度看养老院的善终照护:定性研究结果的系统综述。
Palliat Med. 2019 Jun;33(6):589-606. doi: 10.1177/0269216319840275. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
4
'We DECide optimized' - training nursing home staff in shared decision-making skills for advance care planning conversations in dementia care: protocol of a pretest-posttest cluster randomized trial.“我们决定优化”——培训养老院工作人员在痴呆症护理中进行预先护理计划谈话的共同决策技能:一项预试验后测试的群组随机试验方案。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Feb 4;19(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1044-z.
5
Interventions Guiding Advance Care Planning Conversations: A Systematic Review.干预措施指导预先医疗照护计划的讨论:系统评价。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Mar;20(3):227-248. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.09.014. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
6
Definition and recommendations for advance care planning: an international consensus supported by the European Association for Palliative Care.预先医疗照护计划的定义和建议:欧洲缓和医疗协会支持的国际共识。
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Sep;18(9):e543-e551. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30582-X.
7
Perspectives of older people living in long-term care facilities and of their family members toward advance care planning discussions: a systematic review and thematic synthesis.住在长期护理机构的老年人及其家庭成员对预立医疗照护计划讨论的看法:一项系统综述与主题综合分析
Clin Interv Aging. 2017 Mar 3;12:475-484. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S128937. eCollection 2017.
8
Trends in place of death: The role of demographic and epidemiological shifts in end-of-life care policy.死亡地点趋势:人口和流行病学变化在临终关怀政策中的作用。
Palliat Med. 2017 Dec;31(10):964-974. doi: 10.1177/0269216317691259. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
9
End-of-life care bonus promoting end-of-life care in nursing homes: An 11-year retrospective longitudinal prefecture-wide study in Japan.临终关怀奖金对养老院临终关怀的促进作用:日本一项为期11年的全地区回顾性纵向研究。
Biosci Trends. 2017 Mar 22;11(1):54-61. doi: 10.5582/bst.2016.01183. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
10
Participation in treatment decision-making among Chinese-Australian women with breast cancer.澳大利亚华裔乳腺癌女性参与治疗决策的情况。
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Mar;25(3):957-963. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3487-5. Epub 2016 Nov 18.

家庭成员在日本养老院参与临终关怀讨论的体验:对家庭成员叙述的定性描述性研究。

Family Members' Experience of Discussions on End-of-Life Care in Nursing Homes in Japan: A Qualitative Descriptive Study of Family Members' Narratives.

出版信息

J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2020 Oct;22(5):401-406. doi: 10.1097/NJH.0000000000000677.

DOI:10.1097/NJH.0000000000000677
PMID:32769693
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7469871/
Abstract

In nursing homes, discussions between family members and staff regarding the end of life for residents with cognitive impairment are crucial to the choice of treatment and care consistent with residents' wishes. However, family members experience burden in such discussions, and communication with staff remains inadequate. The purpose of this qualitative descriptive study was to elucidate the meaning of continuous end-of-life discussion for family members. Data were collected using semistructured individual interviews. Thirteen family members of residents from 3 nursing homes in Kyoto, Japan, participated in the study. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis, which focused on both explicit and implicit meanings. Four themes emerged regarding the experience of end-of-life discussion: "the end of life soaking in," "hardship of making the decision to end my family member's life," "wavering thoughts about decisions made and actions taken," and "feeling a sense of participation about the care." Family members had come to accept the deaths of residents through continuous discussion and experienced strong conflict in facing the death of their family members. Moreover, staff members should understand family members' beliefs and the burden they experience in facing residents' death.

摘要

在养老院中,家属和工作人员就认知障碍居民的生命末期进行讨论,对于选择符合居民意愿的治疗和护理方案至关重要。然而,家属在这些讨论中感到负担沉重,与工作人员的沟通仍然不足。本定性描述性研究旨在阐明家属持续进行生命末期讨论的意义。使用半结构式个人访谈收集数据。来自日本京都 3 家养老院的 13 名居民的家属参与了这项研究。使用主题分析对数据进行分析,重点关注明确和隐含的意义。关于生命末期讨论的体验出现了 4 个主题:“生命末期的浸润”、“决定结束我家人生命的艰难”、“对做出的决定和采取的行动犹豫不决”和“对护理感到参与感”。家属通过持续的讨论已经接受了居民的死亡,并在面对家人的死亡时经历了强烈的冲突。此外,工作人员应该理解家属的信仰和他们在面对居民死亡时所承受的负担。