Fox G S, Smith J B, Namba Y, Johnson R C
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979 Jan 1;133(1):15-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(79)90404-6.
This study was designed to re-evaluate neonatal condition at birth following elective cesarean section performed with epidural anesthesia and a modified technique of general anesthesia. Two groups of 20 patients were studied. Twenty received epidural anesthesia with 2 per cent lidocaine-carbon dioxide-epinephrine, and 20 patients were given general anesthesia. Modifications of our previous general anesthetic technique included the administration, to the mother, of high inspired concentrations of oxygen (66 per cent) prior to delivery, short induction-to-delivery intervals, and positioning of the mother in a 20 degrees left lateral tilt position. No significant differences in oxygen tension and acid-base balance in umbilical venous and arterial blood were demonstrated between the two sets of neonates. One-and five-minute Apgar scores and time to sustained respiration were similar in both groups. Our observations of the infants immediately after delivery led us to conclude that either anesthesia technique is acceptable for elective cesarean section.
本研究旨在重新评估在硬膜外麻醉和改良全身麻醉技术下行择期剖宫产术后新生儿的出生状况。研究对象为两组各20例患者。20例接受2%利多卡因 - 二氧化碳 - 肾上腺素硬膜外麻醉,另外20例接受全身麻醉。我们之前全身麻醉技术的改良包括:分娩前给予母亲高浓度吸氧(66%)、缩短诱导至分娩间隔时间以及将母亲置于左侧20度倾斜位。两组新生儿的脐静脉血和动脉血中的氧分压及酸碱平衡均无显著差异。两组的1分钟和5分钟阿氏评分以及自主呼吸时间相似。我们对分娩后即刻婴儿的观察使我们得出结论,对于择期剖宫产,两种麻醉技术都是可以接受的。