• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全科医生的同理心是否会影响高危患者在生活方式改变方面的赋权和成功?

Does GP empathy influence patient enablement and success in lifestyle change among high risk patients?

机构信息

Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Aug 8;21(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01232-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12875-020-01232-8
PMID:32770946
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7415174/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic lifestyle-related-diseases can be prevented by healthy lifestyle. Patients at high risk of disease may benefit from targeted health checks in general practice. However, general-practice-based-studies have shown that patient outcome, enablement, and well-being may be influenced by general practitioner (GP) empathy. The aim of this study is to investigate 1) how high risk patients evaluate their GPs' empathy during a health check consultation, 2) whether the perceived GP empathy is associated with the patient's enablement in immediate continuation of the health check consultation and 3) the patient's subsequent lifestyle changes.

METHODS

This study is part of a population based non-randomized feasibility study testing a complex intervention that systematically identifies citizens at high risk of lifestyle-related disease and with health-risk behavior and offers targeted preventive services in the Danish primary care sector. The ultimate aim of the intervention is to improve lifestyle and thereby reduce the risk of lifestyle-related disease. In the feasibility study a random sample of patients aged 30 to 59 years were invited to participate, and to fill in a questionnaire on lifestyle-risk factors. Participants deemed to be at high risk of disease were offered a focused clinical examination and a subsequent health check consultation at the GP. Following each health check consultation GP empathy and patient enablement were assessed using The Care Measure (CARE) and Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI). Patient's perceived healthy-lifestyle change (y/n) was assessed after three months. The study has been approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (J.nr 2015-57-0008) and registered at ClinicalTrial. Gov on June 13, 2016.

RESULTS

Twenty-six GP's participated in the study. Among 93 patients receiving a health check consultation 60 rated the GPs empathy. The median CARE-score was 40. The PEI median was 5.5 and 44.9% achieved a healthier lifestyle. No association was observed between GP empathy and patient enablement or a perceived healthier lifestyle.

CONCLUSION

No statistical significant association between the CARE-score and patient enablement or a perceived healthier lifestyle was observed. Our results contrast previous findings and may to some extent be explained by a small sample size and the selected high-risk group.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02797392 .

摘要

背景

慢性生活方式相关疾病可以通过健康的生活方式来预防。患有疾病高风险的患者可能会从一般实践中的有针对性的健康检查中受益。然而,基于一般实践的研究表明,患者的结果、赋权和幸福感可能会受到全科医生(GP)同理心的影响。本研究旨在调查 1)高风险患者在健康检查咨询期间如何评估他们的 GP 同理心,2)感知到的 GP 同理心是否与患者在健康检查咨询的直接延续中的赋权相关,以及 3)患者随后的生活方式改变。

方法

本研究是一项基于人群的非随机可行性研究的一部分,该研究测试了一种复杂的干预措施,该干预措施系统地识别出生活方式相关疾病和健康风险行为的高危人群,并在丹麦初级保健部门提供有针对性的预防服务。该干预措施的最终目标是改善生活方式,从而降低生活方式相关疾病的风险。在可行性研究中,随机抽取了 30 至 59 岁的患者参加,并填写了一份关于生活方式风险因素的问卷。被认为患有疾病高风险的参与者被邀请接受集中的临床检查和随后的 GP 健康检查咨询。每次健康检查咨询后,使用关怀量表(CARE)和患者赋权量表(PEI)评估 GP 同理心和患者赋权。三个月后评估患者感知的健康生活方式改变(是/否)。该研究已获得丹麦数据保护局(J.nr 2015-57-0008)的批准,并于 2016 年 6 月 13 日在 ClinicalTrial.gov 上注册。

结果

26 名 GP 参与了这项研究。在接受健康检查咨询的 93 名患者中,有 60 名患者对 GP 的同理心进行了评分。CARE 评分中位数为 40,PEI 中位数为 5.5,44.9%的患者实现了更健康的生活方式。没有观察到 GP 同理心与患者赋权或感知更健康的生活方式之间存在关联。

结论

没有观察到 CARE 评分与患者赋权或感知更健康的生活方式之间存在统计学显著关联。我们的结果与之前的发现相反,在一定程度上可以解释为样本量小和选择的高风险人群。

试验注册

NCT02797392。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5f1/7415174/a3ff7cf714a6/12875_2020_1232_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5f1/7415174/bd91c0cea113/12875_2020_1232_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5f1/7415174/d1a437fc6eb3/12875_2020_1232_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5f1/7415174/f651d63c79c4/12875_2020_1232_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5f1/7415174/a3ff7cf714a6/12875_2020_1232_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5f1/7415174/bd91c0cea113/12875_2020_1232_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5f1/7415174/d1a437fc6eb3/12875_2020_1232_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5f1/7415174/f651d63c79c4/12875_2020_1232_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5f1/7415174/a3ff7cf714a6/12875_2020_1232_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Does GP empathy influence patient enablement and success in lifestyle change among high risk patients?全科医生的同理心是否会影响高危患者在生活方式改变方面的赋权和成功?
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Aug 8;21(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01232-8.
2
General practitioner empathy, patient enablement, and patient-reported outcomes in primary care in an area of high socio-economic deprivation in Scotland--a pilot prospective study using structural equation modeling.苏格兰社会经济高度贫困地区初级医疗中全科医生的同理心、患者赋能与患者报告结局——一项使用结构方程模型的前瞻性试点研究
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Nov;73(2):240-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.022.
3
Patient enablement requires physician empathy: a cross-sectional study of general practice consultations in areas of high and low socioeconomic deprivation in Scotland.患者赋权需要医生的同理心:苏格兰高和低社会经济剥夺地区的一般实践咨询中的横断面研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Feb 8;13:6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-6.
4
A pilot prospective study on the consultation and relational empathy, patient enablement, and health changes over 12 months in patients going to the Glasgow Homoeopathic Hospital.一项关于前往格拉斯哥顺势疗法医院的患者在12个月内的咨询与关系同理心、患者赋能及健康变化的前瞻性试点研究。
J Altern Complement Med. 2005 Aug;11(4):591-600. doi: 10.1089/acm.2005.11.591.
5
Differences between GP perception of delivered empathy and patient-perceived empathy: a cross-sectional study in primary care.全科医生感知的同理心与患者感知的同理心之间的差异:初级保健中的横断面研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Sep;68(674):e621-e626. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X698381. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
6
Empathy, enablement, and outcome: an exploratory study on acupuncture patients' perceptions.同理心、赋能与结果:一项关于针灸患者认知的探索性研究。
J Altern Complement Med. 2003 Dec;9(6):869-76. doi: 10.1089/107555303771952226.
7
More time for complex consultations in a high-deprivation practice is associated with increased patient enablement.在高度贫困地区的医疗机构中,有更多时间用于复杂会诊与患者能力提升相关。
Br J Gen Pract. 2007 Dec;57(545):960-6. doi: 10.3399/096016407782604910.
8
Practitioner empathy, patient enablement and health outcomes: a prospective study of acupuncture patients.从业者的同理心、患者赋能与健康结局:一项针对针灸患者的前瞻性研究
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Oct;63(1-2):239-45. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.11.006. Epub 2006 Feb 7.
9
Patient Enablement After a Single Appointment With a GP: Analysis of Finnish QUALICOPC Data.全科医生单次诊疗后的患者赋能:对芬兰QUALICOPC数据的分析
J Prim Care Community Health. 2017 Oct;8(4):213-220. doi: 10.1177/2150131917730211. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
10
Empathy Variation in General Practice: A Survey among General Practitioners in Denmark.全科医学中的同理心差异:丹麦全科医生调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Mar 2;15(3):433. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15030433.

本文引用的文献

1
Step-wise approach to prevention of chronic diseases in the Danish primary care sector with the use of a personal digital health profile and targeted follow-up - an assessment of attendance.使用个人数字健康档案和有针对性的随访逐步预防丹麦初级保健部门的慢性病 - 出勤率评估。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 13;19(1):1092. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7419-4.
2
Digital Recruitment and Acceptance of a Stepwise Model to Prevent Chronic Disease in the Danish Primary Care Sector: Cross-Sectional Study.丹麦初级保健部门预防慢性病的逐步模型的数字化招募与接受情况:横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jan 21;21(1):e11658. doi: 10.2196/11658.
3
Targeted prevention in primary care aimed at lifestyle-related diseases: a study protocol for a non-randomised pilot study.
针对与生活方式相关疾病的初级保健中的目标预防:一项非随机试点研究的研究方案
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jul 21;19(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0820-8.
4
Differences between GP perception of delivered empathy and patient-perceived empathy: a cross-sectional study in primary care.全科医生感知的同理心与患者感知的同理心之间的差异:初级保健中的横断面研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Sep;68(674):e621-e626. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X698381. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
5
General Practitioners' Empathy and Health Outcomes: A Prospective Observational Study of Consultations in Areas of High and Low Deprivation.全科医生的同理心与健康结果:高贫困和低贫困地区就诊的前瞻性观察研究。
Ann Fam Med. 2016 Mar;14(2):117-24. doi: 10.1370/afm.1910.
6
Personalized prevention approach with use of a web-based cardiovascular risk assessment with tailored lifestyle follow-up in primary care practice--a pilot study.在初级保健实践中采用基于网络的心血管风险评估并进行个性化生活方式随访的个性化预防方法——一项试点研究。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016 Mar;23(5):544-51. doi: 10.1177/2047487315591441. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
7
Screening for increased cardiometabolic risk in primary care: a systematic review.基层医疗中对心血管代谢风险增加的筛查:一项系统综述
Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Oct;64(627):e616-26. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X681781.
8
Effectiveness of general practice-based health checks: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于全科医疗的健康检查效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Jan;64(618):e47-53. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X676456.
9
Physician empathy and subjective evaluation of medical treatment outcome in trauma surgery patients.创伤外科患者的医生同理心与医疗治疗结果的主观评估
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Apr;95(1):53-60. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.12.007. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
10
Lifestyle interventions in primary health care: professional and organizational challenges.初级卫生保健中的生活方式干预:专业和组织方面的挑战。
Eur J Public Health. 2014 Feb;24(1):79-84. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckt052. Epub 2013 May 30.