1.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Mar 1;11(3):323-333. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.128.
The field of Health Policy and Systems Research (HPSR) views researchers as active participants in processes of knowledge mobilization, learning and action. Yet few studies examine how such processes are institutionalized or consider their health system or wider impacts. This paper aims to contribute insights by presenting a South African experience: the Western Cape (WC) HPSR Journal Club (JC).
The paper draws on collective reflection by its authorial team, who are managerial and academic JC participants; reflective discussions with a wider range of people; and external evaluation reports. The analysis has been validated through rounds of collective engagement among authors, and through comparison with the wider sets of data, documentation and international literature. It considers impacts using a framework drawn from the co-production literature.
Since 2012, the JC has brought together provincial and local government health system managers and academics to discuss complex systems' and social science perspectives on health system development. The JC impacts encompass the trusting relationships (group micro-level) that have not only strengthened personal confidence and leadership skills (individual micro level), but also led to organizational impacts (meso level), such as practice and policy changes (practitioner organizations) and strengthened research and post-graduate teaching programs (academic organizations). Macro-societal impacts are, finally, judged likely to have resulted from new health system practices and policies and from academic post-graduate training activities. This set of impacts has been enabled by: the context of the JC; aspects of the JC design that underpin trusting relationships and mutual learning; the sustained participation of senior health system managers and academic managers who are able to translate new ideas into practice in their own organizational environments; and our individual and collective motivations - including the shared goal of health system development for social justice. Our challenges include risks and costs to ourselves, and the potential exclusion of challenging voices.
The principles and practice of the JC approach, rather than the JC as a model, offer ideas for others wishing to mobilize knowledge for health system development through embedded and co-production processes. It demonstrates the potential for productive human interactions to seed long-lasting systemic change.
卫生政策和体系研究(HPSR)领域将研究人员视为知识转化、学习和行动过程的积极参与者。然而,很少有研究考察这些过程是如何制度化的,或者考虑它们对卫生系统或更广泛的影响。本文旨在通过介绍南非的经验——西开普省(WC)卫生政策和体系研究期刊俱乐部(JC),提供一些见解。
本文借鉴了其作者团队的集体反思,作者团队包括管理和学术 JC 参与者;与更广泛的人群进行的反思性讨论;以及外部评估报告。通过作者之间的集体参与以及与更广泛的数据、文件和国际文献进行比较,对分析结果进行了验证。它使用来自共同生产文献的框架来考虑影响。
自 2012 年以来,JC 将省级和地方政府卫生系统管理人员和学者聚集在一起,讨论复杂系统和社会科学对卫生系统发展的观点。JC 的影响包括信任关系(群体微观层面),这些关系不仅增强了个人的信心和领导能力(个人微观层面),还导致了组织层面的影响,如实践和政策的变化(实践者组织),以及加强了研究和研究生教学计划(学术组织)。最后,从新的卫生系统实践和政策以及学术研究生培训活动中,可以判断出宏观社会层面的影响。这一系列的影响是由以下因素促成的:JC 的背景;建立信任关系和相互学习的 JC 设计方面;高级卫生系统管理人员和学术管理人员的持续参与,他们能够将新想法转化为自己组织环境中的实践;以及我们个人和集体的动机——包括为社会正义发展卫生系统的共同目标。我们面临的挑战包括对我们自己的风险和成本,以及可能排除具有挑战性的声音。
JC 方法的原则和实践,而不是 JC 作为一种模式,为那些希望通过嵌入式和共同生产过程为卫生系统发展调动知识的人提供了想法。它展示了富有成效的人际互动有可能引发持久的系统性变革。