• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从阿尔法到欧米伽,乃至更远!审视《应用心理学杂志》中心理测量稳健性的过去、现在和(可能的)未来。

From alpha to omega and beyond! A look at the past, present, and (possible) future of psychometric soundness in the Journal of Applied Psychology.

作者信息

Cortina Jose M, Sheng Zitong, Keener Sheila K, Keeler Kathleen R, Grubb Leah K, Schmitt Neal, Tonidandel Scott, Summerville Karoline M, Heggestad Eric D, Banks George C

机构信息

Department of Management and Entrepreneurship, Virginia Commonwealth University.

Future of Work Institute, Curtin University.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 2020 Dec;105(12):1351-1381. doi: 10.1037/apl0000815. Epub 2020 Aug 10.

DOI:10.1037/apl0000815
PMID:32772525
Abstract

The psychometric soundness of measures has been a central concern of articles published in the Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP) since the inception of the journal. At the same time, it isn't clear that investigators and reviewers prioritize psychometric soundness to a degree that would allow one to have sufficient confidence in conclusions regarding constructs. The purposes of the present article are to (a) examine current scale development and evaluation practices in JAP; (b) compare these practices to recommended practices, previous practices, and practices in other journals; and (c) use these comparisons to make recommendations for reviewers, editors, and investigators regarding the creation and evaluation of measures including Excel-based calculators for various indices. Finally, given that model complexity appears to have increased the need for short scales, we offer a user-friendly R Shiny app (https://orgscience.uncc.edu/about-us/resources) that identifies the subset of items that maximize a variety of psychometric criteria rather than merely maximizing alpha. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

自《应用心理学杂志》(JAP)创刊以来,测量方法的心理测量稳健性一直是该杂志发表文章的核心关注点。与此同时,尚不清楚研究者和审稿人是否将心理测量稳健性置于足够的优先地位,以使人们能够对有关构念的结论有足够的信心。本文的目的是:(a)审视JAP当前的量表开发和评估实践;(b)将这些实践与推荐实践、以往实践以及其他期刊的实践进行比较;(c)利用这些比较结果,就测量方法的创建和评估向审稿人、编辑和研究者提出建议,包括针对各种指标的基于Excel的计算器。最后,鉴于模型复杂性似乎增加了对短量表的需求,我们提供了一个用户友好的R Shiny应用程序(https://orgscience.uncc.edu/about-us/resources),该程序可识别能使各种心理测量标准最大化的项目子集,而不仅仅是使阿尔法系数最大化。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》(c)2020美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

相似文献

1
From alpha to omega and beyond! A look at the past, present, and (possible) future of psychometric soundness in the Journal of Applied Psychology.从阿尔法到欧米伽,乃至更远!审视《应用心理学杂志》中心理测量稳健性的过去、现在和(可能的)未来。
J Appl Psychol. 2020 Dec;105(12):1351-1381. doi: 10.1037/apl0000815. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Best practices for examining and reporting the social consequences of educational measures.审视与报告教育措施的社会影响的最佳做法。
Sch Psychol. 2023 May;38(3):129-136. doi: 10.1037/spq0000550.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
Organizational climate and culture: Reflections on the history of the constructs in the Journal of Applied Psychology.组织氛围与文化:对《应用心理学杂志》中构建体历史的反思。
J Appl Psychol. 2017 Mar;102(3):468-482. doi: 10.1037/apl0000090. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
6
The development and psychometric evaluation of the Trans Discrimination Scale: TDS-21.跨性别歧视量表的编制及心理测量学评价:TDS-21。
J Couns Psychol. 2019 Jan;66(1):14-29. doi: 10.1037/cou0000301. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
7
Editorial.社论。
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Jan;94(1):1-4. doi: 10.1037/a0014990.
8
Reflections on the Journal of Applied Psychology in times of change.变革时代下对《应用心理学杂志》的思考。
J Appl Psychol. 2022 Jan;107(1):1-8. doi: 10.1037/apl0001000.
9
"The Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Trans Discrimination Scale: TDS-21": Correction to Watson et al. (2018).《跨性别歧视量表(TDS-21)的编制与心理计量学评估》:对 Watson 等人(2018 年)的更正。
J Couns Psychol. 2019 Jan;66(1):29. doi: 10.1037/cou0000331.
10
Editorial.社论。
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Jan;100(1):1-4. doi: 10.1037/apl0000009.

引用本文的文献

1
Why are we still using the PHQ-9? A Historical Review and Psychometric Evaluation of Measurement Invariance.我们为何仍在使用患者健康问卷-9?测量不变性的历史回顾与心理测量学评估。
Psychiatr Q. 2025 Sep 3. doi: 10.1007/s11126-025-10208-9.
2
Unifying work values: establishing a circular framework based on basic human values.统一工作价值观:基于基本人类价值观建立一个循环框架。
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 11;16:1526799. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1526799. eCollection 2025.
3
Invariance and item bias of the Mental Health Continuum Short-Form for South African university first-year students.
南非大学一年级学生心理健康连续体简表的不变性与项目偏差
Afr J Psychol Assess. 2024 Mar 26;6:143. doi: 10.4102/ajopa.v6i0.143. eCollection 2024.
4
The validity of a general factor of in the South African context.在南非背景下一个一般因素的有效性。
Afr J Psychol Assess. 2023 Mar 23;5:123. doi: 10.4102/ajopa.v5i0.123. eCollection 2023.
5
Taking on the Invisible Third Shift: The Unequal Division of Cognitive Labor and Women's Work Outcomes.承担无形的第三班工作:认知劳动的不平等分配与女性的工作成果。
Psychol Women Q. 2025 Jun;49(2):205-219. doi: 10.1177/03616843251330284. Epub 2025 Apr 21.
6
Addressing the criticisms and critiques of positive psychology: recommendations for improving the science and practice of the field.应对对积极心理学的批评与评论:改进该领域科学与实践的建议。
Front Psychol. 2025 Mar 26;16:1548612. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1548612. eCollection 2025.
7
Reliability and validity of the Swedish version of the inventory of school attendance problems (ISAP).瑞典版学校出勤问题量表(ISAP)的信度和效度
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 Jul;34(7):2069-2082. doi: 10.1007/s00787-024-02618-0. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
8
Within-Person Dynamics of Job Boredom and Counterproductive Work Behavior: A Latent Change Score Modeling Approach.工作倦怠与反生产工作行为的个体内动态:一种潜在变化得分建模方法。
Affect Sci. 2024 Aug 7;5(3):273-279. doi: 10.1007/s42761-024-00256-y. eCollection 2024 Sep.
9
Psychological measures aren't toothbrushes.心理测量工具可不是牙刷。
Commun Psychol. 2023 Oct 17;1(1):25. doi: 10.1038/s44271-023-00026-9.
10
Concurrent Validity and Inter-Rater Reliability Assessment of Two Mental Toughness Instruments in Firefighting: A Two-Wave Longitudinal Study.两种消防员心理韧性量表的同时效度和评分者间信度评估:两波纵向研究
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Jun 22;14(7):523. doi: 10.3390/bs14070523.