• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

统一工作价值观:基于基本人类价值观建立一个循环框架。

Unifying work values: establishing a circular framework based on basic human values.

作者信息

Schneider Jannick, Kern Marcel, Lorenz Timo

机构信息

Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Engineering, Stuttgart, Germany.

Faculty of Psychology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 11;16:1526799. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1526799. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1526799
PMID:40861345
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12376437/
Abstract

This paper addresses challenges in personal work value research, particularly the lack of theoretical and explanatory foundations. With a focus on lists of constructs and potential biases and blind spots in past work value conceptualizations, the diversity of instruments used to assess values in organizational settings has led to ambiguity and incomplete progress in the field. By integrating propositions from basic value research, this paper develops a comprehensive work value theory. The theory is based on the compatibility and conflict of underlying basic motivational goals in work contexts, as postulated by the theory of basic human values. We review past instruments from work value research to consider a broad range of constructs with the purpose of refining broader work value constructs and enhance their theoretical capabilities in organizational settings. To achieve that, we resolve definitional inconsistencies, enable a context-sensitive theorizing of values in a motivational circumplex and broaden the scope of work value constructs to cover personal and social-focused dimensions. The latter is discussed considering the fantasmatic logic of neoliberal ideology. The developed theoretical framework can guide future research on the role of work values for organizational behavior and organizational performance, as well as on the role of fit between personal and organizational values. The paper concludes by highlighting the need to empirically validate the proposed work value model across different cultures and organizational contexts.

摘要

本文探讨了个人工作价值观研究中的挑战,尤其是缺乏理论和解释基础的问题。以往工作价值观概念化过程中,侧重于构建清单以及潜在的偏差和盲点,用于评估组织环境中价值观的工具多样性导致了该领域的模糊性和进展不完整。通过整合基础价值观研究的命题,本文构建了一个全面的工作价值观理论。该理论基于工作情境中潜在的基本动机目标的兼容性和冲突性,这是基本人类价值观理论所假定的。我们回顾了以往工作价值观研究中的工具,以考虑广泛的构建,目的是完善更广泛的工作价值观构建,并增强其在组织环境中的理论能力。为实现这一目标,我们解决定义上的不一致,在动机环型模型中实现对价值观的情境敏感理论化,并拓宽工作价值观构建的范围,以涵盖个人和社会聚焦维度。后者结合新自由主义意识形态的幻想逻辑进行了讨论。所构建的理论框架可以指导未来关于工作价值观对组织行为和组织绩效作用的研究,以及个人与组织价值观匹配作用的研究。本文最后强调了在不同文化和组织背景下对所提出的工作价值观模型进行实证验证的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/393a/12376437/65e41c88a9fe/fpsyg-16-1526799-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/393a/12376437/d25234b9e1ce/fpsyg-16-1526799-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/393a/12376437/65e41c88a9fe/fpsyg-16-1526799-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/393a/12376437/d25234b9e1ce/fpsyg-16-1526799-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/393a/12376437/65e41c88a9fe/fpsyg-16-1526799-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Unifying work values: establishing a circular framework based on basic human values.统一工作价值观:基于基本人类价值观建立一个循环框架。
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 11;16:1526799. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1526799. eCollection 2025.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
A Scoping Review of the Observed and Perceived Functional Impacts Associated With Language and Learning Disorders in School-Aged Children.一项关于学龄儿童语言和学习障碍相关的观察到的和感知到的功能影响的范围综述。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Jul-Aug;60(4):e70086. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70086.
4
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
5
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
6
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
7
Healthcare workers' informal uses of mobile phones and other mobile devices to support their work: a qualitative evidence synthesis.医护人员非正规使用手机和其他移动设备来支持工作:定性证据综合评价。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 27;8(8):CD015705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015705.pub2.
8
Faculty development initiatives designed to promote leadership in medical education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 19.旨在促进医学教育领导力的教师发展计划。BEME 系统评价:BEME 指南第 19 号。
Med Teach. 2012;34(6):483-503. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.680937.
9
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
10
Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome全身炎症反应综合征

本文引用的文献

1
Academic research values: Conceptualization and initial steps of scale development.学术研究价值:量表开发的概念化及初步步骤。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 25;20(3):e0318086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318086. eCollection 2025.
2
Toward whole-person fit assessment: Integrating interests, values, skills, knowledge, and personality using the Occupational Information Network (O*NET).迈向全人适配评估:利用职业信息网络(O*NET)整合兴趣、价值观、技能、知识和个性。
J Appl Psychol. 2025 May;110(5):623-647. doi: 10.1037/apl0001232. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
3
Individual work-motive values: determinants and consequences for the appraisal of specific health-related work characteristics.
个体工作动机价值观:对特定健康相关工作特征评估的决定因素及后果
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 7;15:1332687. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1332687. eCollection 2024.
4
Establishing circularity: development and validation of the circular work value scale (CWVS).建立循环性:循环工作价值观量表(CWVS)的开发与验证。
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 5;15:1296282. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1296282. eCollection 2024.
5
Internal and external self-affirmation resources: validation and assessment of psychometric properties of the spontaneous self-affirmation measure using structural equation modeling.内部和外部自我肯定资源:使用结构方程模型对自发自我肯定测量的心理测量特性进行验证和评估。
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 4;15:1217416. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1217416. eCollection 2024.
6
Activating values intervention: an integrative pathway to well-being.激活价值观干预:通往幸福的综合途径。
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 2;15:1375237. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1375237. eCollection 2024.
7
Values as Motives: Implications for theory, methods, and practice.价值观作为动机:对理论、方法和实践的启示
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2024 Dec;58(4):1704-1750. doi: 10.1007/s12124-024-09817-z. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
8
Achievement Goals: A Social Influence Cycle.成就目标:一个社会影响循环。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2024 Jan 18;75:527-554. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-013123-102139. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
9
Developing engaged and 'teamful' leaders: A randomized controlled trial of the 5R identity leadership program.培养投入和“团队协作”的领导者:5R 身份领导力计划的随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2023 May 25;18(5):e0286263. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286263. eCollection 2023.
10
Work values across generations: Development of the New Work Values Scale (NWVS) and examination of generational differences.不同代际的工作价值观:新工作价值观量表(NWVS)的开发及代际差异研究。
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 7;13:1028072. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1028072. eCollection 2022.