Putman Breanna J, Gasca Maria, Blumstein Daniel T, Pauly Gregory B
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, 621 Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1606, USA.
Section of Herpetology, and Urban Nature Research Center, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90007, USA.
Urban Ecosyst. 2019 Dec;22(6):1071-1081. doi: 10.1007/s11252-019-00889-z. Epub 2019 Jul 27.
Urbanization induced habitat loss and alteration causes significant challenges for the survival of many species. Identifying how species respond to urbanization can yield insights for the conservation of wildlife, but research on reptiles has been narrowly-focused. We compared morphology among four populations of western fence lizards () to determine whether a common native species affected by urbanization exhibits morphological differences consistent with habitat use. We quantified habitat differences across four sites in Los Angeles County, California, USA that varied in level of urbanization, measured how lizards used microhabitats, and assessed variation in body size, limb length, toe length, and scalation of lizards collected from each site. Urban and suburban populations of fence lizards mostly used human-made substrates while lizards from more natural areas mostly used natural woody substrates. Lizards from the most urban site also exhibited the widest breadth of substrates used, indicating that urban sites might offer more variable microhabitats. Urban lizards had reduced limb lengths and toe lengths consistent with how they used microhabitats and other habitat characteristics (e.g., percent impervious surface cover). Urban lizards also had fewer dorsal scales, which might be associated with changes in ambient temperature (e.g., urban heat island effect), given that lizards with fewer and larger scales typically have reduced evaporative water loss. Our results uniquely differ from past studies on lizard responses to urbanization, indicating that work on diverse taxa is necessary to assess the potential varied pathways of morphological adaptations to urban environments.
城市化导致的栖息地丧失和改变给许多物种的生存带来了重大挑战。确定物种如何应对城市化能够为野生动物保护提供见解,但对爬行动物的研究一直较为局限。我们比较了西部围栏蜥蜴()四个种群的形态,以确定受城市化影响的常见本土物种是否表现出与栖息地利用一致的形态差异。我们量化了美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶县四个城市化程度不同的地点的栖息地差异,测量了蜥蜴对微栖息地的利用情况,并评估了从每个地点采集的蜥蜴的体型、肢体长度、趾长和鳞片的变化。围栏蜥蜴的城市和郊区种群大多使用人造基质,而来自更自然区域的蜥蜴大多使用天然木质基质。来自城市化程度最高地点的蜥蜴使用的基质种类也最广泛,这表明城市地点可能提供更多样化的微栖息地。城市蜥蜴的肢体长度和趾长缩短,这与它们对微栖息地和其他栖息地特征(如不透水表面覆盖率)的利用方式一致。城市蜥蜴的背鳞也较少,鉴于鳞片较少且较大的蜥蜴通常蒸发失水减少,这可能与环境温度的变化(如城市热岛效应)有关。我们的结果与过去关于蜥蜴对城市化反应的研究截然不同,这表明有必要对不同类群进行研究,以评估形态适应城市环境的潜在多种途径。