• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“去上皮”常规交联与“去上皮”加速交联手术5年随访的对比结果

Comparative Results of "Epi-Off" Conventional versus "Epi-Off" Accelerated Cross-Linking Procedure at 5-year Follow-Up.

作者信息

Nicula Cristina Ariadna, Nicula Dorin, Rednik Anca Maria, Bulboacă Adriana Elena

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Oculens Clinic, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

出版信息

J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jul 22;2020:4745101. doi: 10.1155/2020/4745101. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1155/2020/4745101
PMID:32774904
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7396097/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of our study was to compare the long-term efficacy and safety of "epi-off" conventional and "epi-off" accelerated corneal cross-linking (CXL) in patients with progressive keratoconus.

METHODS

"Epithelial-off" ("Epi-off") CXL using the conventional technique (3 mW/cm, 30 minutes) was performed in 93 eyes of 93 patients (S-CXL group) and "epi-off" accelerated method (9 mW/cm, 10 minutes) in 76 eyes of 76 patients with progressive KCN (A-CXL group). Cases with different stages of keratoconus and topographic evidence of progression were included. Main outcomes comprised refraction, keratometry measurements, uncorrected (UCVA) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and topographical indices. Micromorphological analysis was assessed by anterior segment ocular coherence tomography (AS-OCT). The follow-up period was 5 years.

RESULTS

In both groups, Kflat presented similar results: decrease at 1 year (=0.465), at 2 years (=0.672), at 3 years (=0.198), at 4 years (=0.32), and at 5 years (=0.864). In both groups, Ksteep presented a similar decrease at 1 year (=0.709), at 2 years (=0.455), at 3 years (=0.43), at 4 years (=0.57), and at 5 years (=0.494), with no statistically significant difference. Decrease in Kavg was similar in both groups at all analyzed time points (=0.18 at 1 year, =0.093 at 2 years, =0.57 at 3 years, =0.154 at 4 years, and =0.247 at 5 years). Kmax had a similar decrease in both groups at 1 year (=0.06), at 2 years (=0.09), at 3 years (=0.126), at 4 years (=0.113), and at 5 years (=0.114). There was no statistically significant difference between the cylinder decrease in both groups (=0.349 at 1 year, =0.6782 at 2 years, =0.299 at 3 years, =0.0943 at 4 years, and =0.144 at 5 years). The BCVA values were statistically significantly higher than the preoperative values in both groups at all time points ( < 0.05). Topographical indices such as thinnest corneal point (TP), corneal volume (CV), index vertical asymmetry (IVA), index of vertical asymmetry (ISV), index of height asymmetry (IHA), index of height decentration (IHD), Belin/Ambrosio Enhanced Ectasia Display (BAD_D), and Ambrosio retinal thickness (ART Max) were significantly statistically decreased compared with baseline at all time points, in both groups.

CONCLUSION

"Epi-off" accelerated and conventional CXL have the same efficacy in terms of improvement in visual and topographic outcomes.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较“去上皮”传统角膜交联术(CXL)与“去上皮”加速角膜交联术对圆锥角膜患者的长期疗效和安全性。

方法

对93例患者的93只眼采用传统技术(3 mW/cm,30分钟)进行“去上皮”(“Epi-off”)CXL(S-CXL组),对76例圆锥角膜患者的76只眼采用“去上皮”加速方法(9 mW/cm,10分钟)(A-CXL组)。纳入不同阶段圆锥角膜且有地形图进展证据的病例。主要观察指标包括验光、角膜曲率测量、未矫正视力(UCVA)和最佳矫正视力(BCVA)以及地形图指数。通过眼前节光学相干断层扫描(AS-OCT)进行微观形态学分析。随访期为5年。

结果

两组中,平坦角膜曲率(Kflat)呈现相似结果:1年时下降(=0.465),2年时下降(=0.672),3年时下降(=0.198),4年时下降(=0.32),5年时下降(=0.864)。两组中,陡峭角膜曲率(Ksteep)在1年时下降(=0.709),2年时下降(=0.455),3年时下降(=0.43),4年时下降(=0.57),5年时下降(=0.494),差异无统计学意义。在所有分析时间点,两组平均角膜曲率(Kavg)下降情况相似(1年时=0.18,2年时=0.093,3年时=0.57,4年时=0.154,5年时=0.247)。两组中最大角膜曲率(Kmax)在1年时下降(=0.06),2年时下降(=0.09),3年时下降(=0.126),4年时下降(=0.113),5年时下降(=0.114)。两组中柱镜度数下降情况差异无统计学意义(1年时=0.349,2年时=0.6782,3年时=0.299,4年时=0.0943,5年时=0.144)。在所有时间点,两组的BCVA值均显著高于术前值(<0.05)。在所有时间点,两组的角膜最薄点(TP)、角膜体积(CV)、垂直不对称指数(IVA)、垂直不对称指数(ISV)、高度不对称指数(IHA)、高度偏心指数(IHD)、贝林/安布罗西奥增强型圆锥角膜显示(BAD_D)和安布罗西奥视网膜厚度(ART Max)等地形图指数与基线相比均显著下降。

结论

“去上皮”加速角膜交联术和传统角膜交联术在改善视力和地形图结果方面具有相同疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9aa/7396097/6d410a40313d/JOPH2020-4745101.008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9aa/7396097/43a08070544d/JOPH2020-4745101.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9aa/7396097/dc92fbccc6c6/JOPH2020-4745101.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9aa/7396097/d2cb3f3080d0/JOPH2020-4745101.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9aa/7396097/d13827e7d995/JOPH2020-4745101.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9aa/7396097/cc16543c54fd/JOPH2020-4745101.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9aa/7396097/62ba2fcdaf78/JOPH2020-4745101.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9aa/7396097/f0b1b507446c/JOPH2020-4745101.007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9aa/7396097/6d410a40313d/JOPH2020-4745101.008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9aa/7396097/43a08070544d/JOPH2020-4745101.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9aa/7396097/dc92fbccc6c6/JOPH2020-4745101.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9aa/7396097/d2cb3f3080d0/JOPH2020-4745101.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9aa/7396097/d13827e7d995/JOPH2020-4745101.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9aa/7396097/cc16543c54fd/JOPH2020-4745101.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9aa/7396097/62ba2fcdaf78/JOPH2020-4745101.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9aa/7396097/f0b1b507446c/JOPH2020-4745101.007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9aa/7396097/6d410a40313d/JOPH2020-4745101.008.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative Results of "Epi-Off" Conventional versus "Epi-Off" Accelerated Cross-Linking Procedure at 5-year Follow-Up.“去上皮”常规交联与“去上皮”加速交联手术5年随访的对比结果
J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jul 22;2020:4745101. doi: 10.1155/2020/4745101. eCollection 2020.
2
Comparative Results Between "Epi-Off" Accelerated and "Epi-Off" Standard Corneal Collagen Crosslinking-UVA in Progressive Keratoconus - 7 Years of Follow-Up.进行性圆锥角膜中“去上皮”加速与“去上皮”标准角膜胶原交联-UVA的比较结果——7年随访
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2021 Sep 7;17:975-988. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S321410. eCollection 2021.
3
Accelerated epithelium-on or accelerated epithelium-off corneal collagen cross-linking: Contralateral comparison study.加速上皮在位或加速上皮脱失的角膜胶原交联:对侧比较研究。
Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar 4;10(1):37-44. doi: 10.4103/tjo.tjo_11_19. eCollection 2020 Jan-Mar.
4
Comparative Results Between "Epi-Off" Conventional and Accelerated Corneal Collagen Crosslinking for Progressive Keratoconus in Pediatric Patients.小儿进行性圆锥角膜“去上皮”传统与加速角膜胶原交联的比较结果
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2019 Dec 30;15:1483-1490. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S224533. eCollection 2019.
5
Accelerated Epi-On Versus Standard Epi-Off Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for Progressive Keratoconus in Pediatric Patients: Five Years of Follow-Up.加速 Epi-On 与标准 Epi-Off 角膜胶原交联术治疗儿童进行性圆锥角膜:五年随访。
Cornea. 2020 Dec;39(12):1493-1498. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002463.
6
Outcomes of Epi-On Collagen Cross-Linkage Procedure Assessed in Progressive Keratoconus Patients.在进展性圆锥角膜患者中评估的上皮瓣下胶原交联手术的结果。
Cureus. 2022 Oct 25;14(10):e30664. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30664. eCollection 2022 Oct.
7
Iontophoretic Transepithelial Collagen Cross-Linking Versus Epithelium-Off Collagen Cross-Linking in Pediatric Patients: 3-Year Follow-Up.儿童患者中离子导入经上皮胶原交联与上皮剥脱性胶原交联的比较:3年随访
Cornea. 2019 Jul;38(7):859-863. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001965.
8
Visual, Topographic, and Pachymetric Effects of Pediatric Corneal Collagen Cross-linking.儿童角膜胶原交联的视觉、地形图及角膜厚度测量效应
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2017 Mar 1;54(2):84-89. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20160831-01. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
9
Epi-Off versus Epi-On Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking in Keratoconus Patients: A Comparative Study through 2-Year Follow-Up.圆锥角膜患者中去上皮与上皮在位角膜胶原交联的比较研究:一项为期2年的随访研究
J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jul 29;2018:4947983. doi: 10.1155/2018/4947983. eCollection 2018.
10
Prospective, randomized contralateral eye study of accelerated and conventional corneal cross-linking in pediatric keratoconus.小儿圆锥角膜加速与传统角膜交联的前瞻性、随机对侧眼研究
Int Ophthalmol. 2019 May;39(5):971-979. doi: 10.1007/s10792-018-0898-y. Epub 2018 Mar 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Accelerated Transepithelial Corneal Crosslinking in Non-Pediatric Patients with Progressive Keratoconus: Insights from a Retrospective Cohort Study.加速经上皮角膜交联术治疗非儿童进行性圆锥角膜患者的疗效与安全性:一项回顾性队列研究的见解
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Mar 6;13(5):567. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13050567.
2
Keratoconus Diagnosis and Treatment: Recent Advances and Future Directions.圆锥角膜的诊断与治疗:最新进展与未来方向
Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 Sep 16;17:2705-2718. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S392665. eCollection 2023.
3
Accelerated corneal cross-linking (18mW/cm2 for 5 min) with HPMC-riboflavin in progressive keratoconus - 5 years follow-up.

本文引用的文献

1
Two-year changes in corneal stiffness parameters after accelerated corneal cross-linking.加速角膜交联术后两年角膜硬度参数的变化。
J Biomech. 2019 Aug 27;93:209-212. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.06.011. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
2
Different accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking treatment modalities in progressive keratoconus.圆锥角膜进展期不同的加速角膜胶原交联治疗方式
Eye Vis (Lond). 2019 Jun 3;6:16. doi: 10.1186/s40662-019-0141-6. eCollection 2019.
3
10-Year Results of Standard Cross-Linking in Patients with Progressive Keratoconus in Romania.
渐进性圆锥角膜中使用 HPMC-核黄素的加速角膜交联术(18mW/cm2 照射 5 分钟)——5 年随访结果。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024 Mar;262(3):871-877. doi: 10.1007/s00417-023-06225-8. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
4
Reliability analysis of successive Corvis ST® measurements in keratoconus 2 years after accelerated corneal crosslinking compared to untreated keratoconus corneas.交联手术后 2 年的圆锥角膜与未经交联处理的圆锥角膜的 Corvis ST®连续测量的可靠性分析。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023 Apr;261(4):1055-1061. doi: 10.1007/s00417-022-05881-6. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
5
Commentary: Bunsen-Roscoe reciprocity - Is it still valid?评论:本生-罗斯科互易性——它仍然有效吗?
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022 Aug;70(8):2936-2937. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_294_22.
6
[Stage-appropriate treatment of keratoconus].圆锥角膜的分期适宜治疗
Ophthalmologe. 2021 Oct;118(10):1069-1088. doi: 10.1007/s00347-021-01410-8. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
罗马尼亚圆锥角膜患者标准交联手术的10年随访结果
J Ophthalmol. 2019 Mar 7;2019:8285649. doi: 10.1155/2019/8285649. eCollection 2019.
4
A Review of Corneal Collagen Cross-linking - Current Trends in Practice Applications.角膜胶原交联术综述——实践应用的当前趋势
Open Ophthalmol J. 2018 Jul 23;12:181-213. doi: 10.2174/1874364101812010181. eCollection 2018.
5
Comparison of Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking Protocols Measured With Scheimpflug Tomography.使用Scheimpflug断层扫描测量的角膜胶原交联方案的比较。
Cornea. 2018 Jul;37(7):870-874. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001600.
6
Long-term efficacy and safety after corneal collagen crosslinking in pediatric patients: Three-year follow-up.小儿患者角膜胶原交联术后的长期疗效与安全性:三年随访
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jul;28(4):415-418. doi: 10.1177/1120672118760149. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
7
Long-term database analysis of conventional and accelerated crosslinked keratoconic mid-European eyes.中欧圆锥角膜患者常规交联和加速交联的长期数据库分析
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Jun;256(6):1165-1172. doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-3955-3. Epub 2018 Mar 10.
8
Differences in corneal clinical findings after standard and accelerated cross-linking in patients with progressive keratoconus.圆锥角膜患者标准交联和加速交联后角膜临床结果的差异。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2017 Nov 28;17(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0610-4.
9
Conventional Versus Accelerated Collagen Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: A Comparison of Visual, Refractive, Topographic and Biomechanical Outcomes.圆锥角膜的传统与加速胶原交联:视觉、屈光、地形图及生物力学结果的比较
Open Ophthalmol J. 2017 Aug 29;11:262-272. doi: 10.2174/1874364101711010262. eCollection 2017.
10
Accelerated 15 mW pulsed-light crosslinking to treat progressive keratoconus: Two-year clinical results.加速 15mW 脉冲光交联治疗进行性圆锥角膜:两年临床结果。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017 Aug;43(8):1081-1088. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.05.030.