Department of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany.
Department of Ophthalmology & Vision Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023 Apr;261(4):1055-1061. doi: 10.1007/s00417-022-05881-6. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
To assess the reliability of successive Corvis ST® measurements (CST, Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) in keratoconus (KC) ≥ 2 years after accelerated corneal crosslinking (9 mW/cm, 10 min, 5.4 J/cm) compared to untreated KC corneas.
Three successive CST measurements per eye were performed in ≥ 2 years after CXL (CXLG, n = 20 corneas of 16 patients) and a control group consisting of non-operated, ABC-stage-matched KC corneas according to Belin's ABCD KC grading (controls, n = 20 corneas, 20 patients). Main outcome measures included maximal keratometry (Kmax), the Belin/Ambrósio-Enhanced-Ectasia-Deviation-Index BAD-D; the biomechanical parameters A1 velocity, deformation amplitude (DA) ratio 2 mm, Ambrósio relational thickness to the horizontal profile (ARTh), integrated radius, stiffness parameter A1 (SP-A1), and the Corvis Biomechanical Factor (CBiF, the linearized term of the Corvis Biomechanical Index). Mean values, standard deviations, and Cronbach's alpha (CA) were calculated.
Both groups were tomographically comparable (BAD: 11.5 ± 4.7|11.2 ± 3.6, p = 0.682, Kmax: 60.5 ± 7.2|60.7 ± 7.7, p = 0.868 for controls|CXLG, paired t-test). A1 velocity (mean ± SD: 0.176 ± 0.02|0.183 ± 0.02, p = 0.090, CA: 0.960|0.960), DA ratio 2 mm (6.04 ± 1.13|6.14 ± 1.03, p = 0.490, CA: 0.967|0.967), integrated radius (12.08 ± 2.5|12.42 ± 1.9, p = 0.450, CA: 0.976|0.976), and CBiF (4.62 ± 0.6|4.62 ± 0.4, p = 0.830, CA: 0.965|0.965) were also comparable (controls|CXLG). ARTh was significantly higher in controls (177.1 ± 59, CA: 0.993) than after CXL (155.21 ± 65, p = 0.0062, CA: 0.993) and SP-A1 was significantly higher after CXL (59.2 ± 13, CA: 0.912) than in controls (52.2 ± 16, p = 0.0018, CA: 0.912).
ARTh and SP-A1 differed significantly between controls and CXLG. Biomechanical measurements were generally of excellent reliability in both groups. CXL seems to affect biomechanical measurements of human corneas over more than 2 years.
评估在加速角膜交联术(CXL,9 mW/cm,10 分钟,5.4 J/cm)后至少 2 年,角膜交联术后(CXLG,n = 16 例 20 只眼)的角膜比未经处理的圆锥角膜(KC)角膜的连续 Corvis ST®测量(CST,Oculus,Wetzlar,德国)的可靠性。
在 CXLG 后至少 2 年,对 20 只眼的每只眼进行 3 次连续 CST 测量,并对非手术、根据 Belin 的 ABCD KC 分级(对照组,n = 20 只眼,20 例患者)匹配 ABC 期的 KC 角膜进行对照。主要观察指标包括最大角膜曲率(Kmax)、Belin/Ambrósio-Enhanced-Ectasia-Deviation-Index-BAD-D;生物力学参数 A1 速度、变形幅度(DA)比 2mm、Ambrósio 相对厚度与水平轮廓比(ARTh)、整合半径、硬度参数 A1(SP-A1)和 Corvis 生物力学因子(CBiF,Corvis 生物力学指数的线性项)。计算平均值、标准差和 Cronbach's alpha(CA)。
两组在 CT 上均具有可比性(BAD:11.5 ± 4.7|11.2 ± 3.6,p = 0.682,Kmax:60.5 ± 7.2|60.7 ± 7.7,p = 0.868 为对照组|CXLG,配对 t 检验)。A1 速度(平均值 ± 标准差:0.176 ± 0.02|0.183 ± 0.02,p = 0.090,CA:0.960|0.960),DA 比 2mm(6.04 ± 1.13|6.14 ± 1.03,p = 0.490,CA:0.967|0.967),整合半径(12.08 ± 2.5|12.42 ± 1.9,p = 0.450,CA:0.976|0.976)和 CBiF(4.62 ± 0.6|4.62 ± 0.4,p = 0.830,CA:0.965|0.965)也具有可比性(对照组|CXLG)。ARTh 在对照组(177.1 ± 59,CA:0.993)中明显高于 CXL 后(155.21 ± 65,p = 0.0062,CA:0.993),SP-A1 在 CXL 后(59.2 ± 13,CA:0.912)中明显高于对照组(52.2 ± 16,p = 0.0018,CA:0.912)。
ARTh 和 SP-A1 在对照组和 CXLG 之间有显著差异。两组的生物力学测量均具有良好的可靠性。CXL 似乎会影响人类角膜的生物力学测量超过 2 年。