Suppr超能文献

交联手术后 2 年的圆锥角膜与未经交联处理的圆锥角膜的 Corvis ST®连续测量的可靠性分析。

Reliability analysis of successive Corvis ST® measurements in keratoconus 2 years after accelerated corneal crosslinking compared to untreated keratoconus corneas.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany.

Department of Ophthalmology & Vision Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.

出版信息

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023 Apr;261(4):1055-1061. doi: 10.1007/s00417-022-05881-6. Epub 2022 Oct 28.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the reliability of successive Corvis ST® measurements (CST, Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) in keratoconus (KC) ≥ 2 years after accelerated corneal crosslinking (9 mW/cm, 10 min, 5.4 J/cm) compared to untreated KC corneas.

METHODS

Three successive CST measurements per eye were performed in ≥ 2 years after CXL (CXLG, n = 20 corneas of 16 patients) and a control group consisting of non-operated, ABC-stage-matched KC corneas according to Belin's ABCD KC grading (controls, n = 20 corneas, 20 patients). Main outcome measures included maximal keratometry (Kmax), the Belin/Ambrósio-Enhanced-Ectasia-Deviation-Index BAD-D; the biomechanical parameters A1 velocity, deformation amplitude (DA) ratio 2 mm, Ambrósio relational thickness to the horizontal profile (ARTh), integrated radius, stiffness parameter A1 (SP-A1), and the Corvis Biomechanical Factor (CBiF, the linearized term of the Corvis Biomechanical Index). Mean values, standard deviations, and Cronbach's alpha (CA) were calculated.

RESULTS

Both groups were tomographically comparable (BAD: 11.5 ± 4.7|11.2 ± 3.6, p = 0.682, Kmax: 60.5 ± 7.2|60.7 ± 7.7, p = 0.868 for controls|CXLG, paired t-test). A1 velocity (mean ± SD: 0.176 ± 0.02|0.183 ± 0.02, p = 0.090, CA: 0.960|0.960), DA ratio 2 mm (6.04 ± 1.13|6.14 ± 1.03, p = 0.490, CA: 0.967|0.967), integrated radius (12.08 ± 2.5|12.42 ± 1.9, p = 0.450, CA: 0.976|0.976), and CBiF (4.62 ± 0.6|4.62 ± 0.4, p = 0.830, CA: 0.965|0.965) were also comparable (controls|CXLG). ARTh was significantly higher in controls (177.1 ± 59, CA: 0.993) than after CXL (155.21 ± 65, p = 0.0062, CA: 0.993) and SP-A1 was significantly higher after CXL (59.2 ± 13, CA: 0.912) than in controls (52.2 ± 16, p = 0.0018, CA: 0.912).

CONCLUSION

ARTh and SP-A1 differed significantly between controls and CXLG. Biomechanical measurements were generally of excellent reliability in both groups. CXL seems to affect biomechanical measurements of human corneas over more than 2 years.

摘要

目的

评估在加速角膜交联术(CXL,9 mW/cm,10 分钟,5.4 J/cm)后至少 2 年,角膜交联术后(CXLG,n = 16 例 20 只眼)的角膜比未经处理的圆锥角膜(KC)角膜的连续 Corvis ST®测量(CST,Oculus,Wetzlar,德国)的可靠性。

方法

在 CXLG 后至少 2 年,对 20 只眼的每只眼进行 3 次连续 CST 测量,并对非手术、根据 Belin 的 ABCD KC 分级(对照组,n = 20 只眼,20 例患者)匹配 ABC 期的 KC 角膜进行对照。主要观察指标包括最大角膜曲率(Kmax)、Belin/Ambrósio-Enhanced-Ectasia-Deviation-Index-BAD-D;生物力学参数 A1 速度、变形幅度(DA)比 2mm、Ambrósio 相对厚度与水平轮廓比(ARTh)、整合半径、硬度参数 A1(SP-A1)和 Corvis 生物力学因子(CBiF,Corvis 生物力学指数的线性项)。计算平均值、标准差和 Cronbach's alpha(CA)。

结果

两组在 CT 上均具有可比性(BAD:11.5 ± 4.7|11.2 ± 3.6,p = 0.682,Kmax:60.5 ± 7.2|60.7 ± 7.7,p = 0.868 为对照组|CXLG,配对 t 检验)。A1 速度(平均值 ± 标准差:0.176 ± 0.02|0.183 ± 0.02,p = 0.090,CA:0.960|0.960),DA 比 2mm(6.04 ± 1.13|6.14 ± 1.03,p = 0.490,CA:0.967|0.967),整合半径(12.08 ± 2.5|12.42 ± 1.9,p = 0.450,CA:0.976|0.976)和 CBiF(4.62 ± 0.6|4.62 ± 0.4,p = 0.830,CA:0.965|0.965)也具有可比性(对照组|CXLG)。ARTh 在对照组(177.1 ± 59,CA:0.993)中明显高于 CXL 后(155.21 ± 65,p = 0.0062,CA:0.993),SP-A1 在 CXL 后(59.2 ± 13,CA:0.912)中明显高于对照组(52.2 ± 16,p = 0.0018,CA:0.912)。

结论

ARTh 和 SP-A1 在对照组和 CXLG 之间有显著差异。两组的生物力学测量均具有良好的可靠性。CXL 似乎会影响人类角膜的生物力学测量超过 2 年。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6db/10049946/da9d7af98103/417_2022_5881_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验