Suppr超能文献

下肢角度测量的可靠性和同时效度:EOS 3D测角仪与二维手动测角仪的比较

Reliability and concurrent validity of angle measurements in lower limb: EOS 3D goniometer versus 2D manual goniometer.

作者信息

Huang Jun, Tian Fanli, Zhang Zhigang, Shi Weidong, Lin Jun, Chen Liang, Yang Huilin

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.

Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, China.

出版信息

J Orthop Translat. 2020 May 20;24:96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2020.05.002. eCollection 2020 Sep.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In clinical routine, preoperative radiographic assessment of lower extremity geometry relies on conventional X-rays. However, the plane goniometric measuring has several limitations in accurately locating anatomical landmarks. The purpose of this study is to propose a fast and accurate 3D-reconstruction-method based on biplanar X-rays with clinical measurements assessment in standing position.

METHODS

50 candidates for HTO or DFO with deformity of the lower extremities were included in this study. Biplanar X-rays were performed using the EOS imaging system in conventional double-stance full weight-bearing position (DS) and shifted-foot standing position (SF). The results of hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA), lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) were evaluated by either 2D manual goniometer (MG) based on X-ray in DS standing position or 3D-reconstruction goniometer based on X-rays in SF standing position.

RESULTS

For the reproducibility study, MG and EOS goniometer were both reliable in repeated measures of HKAA, LDFA, and MPTA, with average concordance correlation coefficients (CCCs) all above 0.910. The agreements between MG and EOS measurements were high for HKAA and LDFA with CCCs all above 0.90, while the agreement was low for MPTA with CCC below 0.75. Further linear regression model analysis also revealed a significant correlation between MG and EOS measurements for HKAA (all R ≥ 0.93) and LDFA (all R ≥ 0.90), but not for MPTA (all R ≤ 0.522).

CONCLUSION

In comparison with the traditional 2D manual goniometer, EOS 3D reconstruction based goniometric measuring could provide equivalent results of HKAA and LDFA, and potentially a more accurate result of MPTA. These findings suggest that EOS 3D reconstruction based goniometric measuring is suitable for preoperative evaluation and planning for HTO/DFO. However, future improvements of the 3D reconstruction method are needed for better detection of the femoral condyles and tibial plates without the requirement of shifted-foot standing position.

THE TRANSLATIONAL POTENTIAL OF THIS ARTICLE

EOS 3D reconstruction based goniometric measuring could provide equivalent or even more accurate results of HKAA, LDFA, and MPTA, in comparison with the traditional 2D manual goniometer, making it suitable for preoperative evaluation and planning for HTO/DFO.

摘要

背景

在临床实践中,下肢几何结构的术前影像学评估依赖于传统X线检查。然而,平面角度测量在准确确定解剖标志点方面存在若干局限性。本研究的目的是提出一种基于双平面X线的快速、准确的三维重建方法,并对站立位的临床测量进行评估。

方法

本研究纳入了50例因下肢畸形而需行高位胫骨截骨术(HTO)或远端股骨截骨术(DFO)的患者。使用EOS成像系统在传统双足全负重位(DS)和移步站立位(SF)进行双平面X线检查。髋-膝-踝角(HKAA)、股骨远端外侧角(LDFA)和胫骨近端内侧角(MPTA)的测量结果通过基于DS站立位X线的二维手动量角器(MG)或基于SF站立位X线的三维重建量角器进行评估。

结果

对于重复性研究,MG和EOS量角器在HKAA、LDFA和MPTA的重复测量中均可靠,平均一致性相关系数(CCC)均高于0.910。MG和EOS测量结果在HKAA和LDFA方面具有高度一致性,CCC均高于0.90,而在MPTA方面一致性较低,CCC低于0.75。进一步的线性回归模型分析还显示,MG和EOS测量结果在HKAA(所有R≥0.93)和LDFA(所有R≥0.90)方面存在显著相关性,但在MPTA方面不存在显著相关性(所有R≤0.522)。

结论

与传统的二维手动量角器相比,基于EOS三维重建的角度测量在HKAA和LDFA方面能提供等效结果,在MPTA方面可能提供更准确的结果。这些发现表明,基于EOS三维重建的角度测量适用于HTO/DFO的术前评估和规划。然而,为了在无需移步站立位的情况下更好地检测股骨髁和胫骨平台,需要对三维重建方法进行进一步改进。

本文的转化潜力

与传统的二维手动量角器相比,基于EOS三维重建的角度测量在HKAA、LDFA和MPTA方面能提供等效甚至更准确的结果,使其适用于HTO/DFO的术前评估和规划。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验