Suppr超能文献

住院患者家庭干预:一项随机临床试验。II. 出院时的结果

Inpatient family intervention: a randomized clinical trial. II. Results at hospital discharge.

作者信息

Haas G L, Glick I D, Clarkin J F, Spencer J H, Lewis A B, Peyser J, DeMane N, Good-Ellis M, Harris E, Lestelle V

机构信息

Payne Whitney Clinic, New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY 10021.

出版信息

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1988 Mar;45(3):217-24. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1988.01800270025003.

Abstract

Although family intervention is practiced in most psychiatric hospitals, to our knowledge, no adequately controlled studies of its efficacy exist. This study was designed to answer, in part, the question of the relative efficacy of hospitalization with family intervention as compared with hospitalization without family intervention for patients (1) with major psychiatric disorders, (2) in need of hospital treatment, and (3) for whom both treatments are judged clinically feasible. This article compares treatment results at the time of hospital discharge for 169 patients randomly assigned to the inpatient Family Intervention or comparison conditions. Inpatient Family Intervention had greater efficacy than the comparison treatment, mostly attributable to its effect on female patients, especially those patients (and their families) with affective disorder.

摘要

尽管大多数精神病医院都采用家庭干预,但据我们所知,尚无充分对照的关于其疗效的研究。本研究旨在部分回答以下问题:对于(1)患有重度精神疾病、(2)需要住院治疗且(3)两种治疗在临床上均被判定可行的患者,与无家庭干预的住院治疗相比,有家庭干预的住院治疗的相对疗效如何。本文比较了169例随机分配到住院家庭干预组或对照组的患者出院时的治疗结果。住院家庭干预组比对照治疗更有效,这主要归因于其对女性患者的影响,尤其是那些患有情感障碍的患者(及其家庭)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验