Suppr超能文献

术者与患者对机器人辅助手术的多维度感知:一项横断面研究。

Multiple perceptions of robotic-assisted surgery among surgeons and patients: a cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Department of Surgery (Urology Division), Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Safat, P.O. Box 24923, 13110, Kuwait City, Kuwait.

Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2021 Aug;15(4):529-538. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01136-w. Epub 2020 Aug 10.

Abstract

Limited data exist regarding knowledge and perceptions of surgeons and patients about robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) in the Middle East. This study aimed to explore perceptions of surgeons and patients about RAS. A questionnaire-based survey was distributed among surgeons of different specialties and patients. Between March and September 2019, 278 and 256 surveys were completed by surgeons and patients, respectively (95.2% and 94.8% response rate, respectively). The surgeons' self-reported experience with technology was related to the level of comfort with computers and computer literacy. Most surgeons have heard of RAS availability, and the majority agreed to its introduction into the healthcare system. However, only 75 (27%) of the surgeons thought that the surgeon has complete control over the robot, and 69 (25%) surgeons were not sure of the level of control the surgeon has over the robot reflecting poor knowledge about this technology. Less than a third of patient respondents have heard of RAS. However, half of them would consider it should they need to undergo surgery. When compared to open surgery, 23 (9%), 26 (10%), and 94 (37%) patient respondents thought that RAS caused less pain, had fewer complications, and was faster than conventional surgery, respectively. Knowledge and perceptions about RAS are limited among surgeons and patients in Kuwait. Efforts should focus on increasing awareness.

摘要

关于中东地区外科医生和患者对机器人辅助手术(RAS)的知识和看法,相关数据有限。本研究旨在探讨外科医生和患者对 RAS 的看法。我们对不同专业的外科医生和患者进行了基于问卷调查的调查。在 2019 年 3 月至 9 月期间,分别有 278 名和 256 名外科医生和患者完成了调查(分别为 95.2%和 94.8%的回复率)。外科医生对技术的自我报告经验与其对计算机的舒适度和计算机素养水平有关。大多数外科医生听说过 RAS 的可用性,并且大多数人都同意将其引入医疗保健系统。然而,只有 75 名(27%)外科医生认为外科医生对机器人拥有完全控制权,并且 69 名(25%)外科医生不确定外科医生对机器人的控制程度,这反映出他们对这项技术的了解有限。不到三分之一的患者受访者听说过 RAS。然而,其中一半的人如果需要手术,会考虑使用 RAS。与开放手术相比,分别有 23 名(9%)、26 名(10%)和 94 名(37%)患者受访者认为 RAS 引起的疼痛更少、并发症更少且比传统手术更快。科威特的外科医生和患者对 RAS 的了解和看法有限。应努力提高认识。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验