Registry of Senior Australians, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, SA.
UniSA Business School, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA.
Med J Aust. 2020 Oct;213(7):321-326. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50720. Epub 2020 Aug 9.
To develop and validate a frailty index, derived from aged care eligibility assessment data.
Retrospective cohort study; analysis of the historical national cohort of the Registry of Senior Australians (ROSA).
903 996 non-Indigenous Australians aged 65 years or more, living in the community and assessed for subsidised aged care eligibility during 2003-2013.
44-item frailty index; summary statistics for frailty index score distribution; predictive validity with respect to mortality and entry into permanent residential aged care during the five years after assessment.
The mean frailty index score during 2003-2013 was 0.20 (SD, 0.07; range, 0-0.41); the proportion of assessed older people with scores exceeding 0.20 increased from 32.1% in 2003-2005 to 75.0% in 2012-2013. The risks of death and entry into permanent residential aged care at one, three and five years increased with frailty index score level (at one year, high [over 0.35] v low scores [under 0.05]: hazard ratio for death, 5.99; 95% CI, 5.69-6.31; for entry into permanent residential aged care, 8.70; 95% CI, 8.32-9.11). The predictive validity (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) of Cox proportional hazard models including age, sex, and frailty index score was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.63-0.64) for death and 0.63 (95% CI, 0.62-0.63) for entry into permanent residential aged care within one year of assessment.
We used Australian aged care eligibility assessment program data to construct and validate a frailty index. It can be employed in aged care research in Australia, but its application to aged care planning requires further investigation.
从老年护理资格评估数据中开发和验证衰弱指数。
回顾性队列研究;对澳大利亚老年人登记处(ROSA)的历史全国队列进行分析。
2003-2013 年间,903996 名年龄在 65 岁及以上、居住在社区并接受补贴性老年护理资格评估的非土著澳大利亚人。
44 项衰弱指数;衰弱指数评分分布的统计摘要;评估后五年内死亡率和进入永久性居住养老院的预测有效性。
2003-2013 年期间,平均衰弱指数评分为 0.20(SD,0.07;范围,0-0.41);评分超过 0.20 的老年人比例从 2003-2005 年的 32.1%增加到 2012-2013 年的 75.0%。死亡和进入永久性居住养老院的风险随着衰弱指数评分的增加而增加(一年时,高[超过 0.35]与低[低于 0.05]:死亡的危险比,5.99;95%CI,5.69-6.31;进入永久性居住养老院的风险比,8.70;95%CI,8.32-9.11)。包括年龄、性别和衰弱指数评分在内的 Cox 比例风险模型的预测有效性(接受者操作特征曲线下面积)为 0.64(95%CI,0.63-0.64)用于死亡,0.63(95%CI,0.62-0.63)用于评估后一年内进入永久性居住养老院。
我们使用澳大利亚老年护理资格评估计划数据构建和验证了衰弱指数。它可用于澳大利亚的老年护理研究,但在老年护理规划中的应用需要进一步研究。