Barth Jessica, Geed Shashwati, Mitchell Abigail, Lum Peter S, Edwards Dorothy F, Dromerick Alexander W
MedStar National Rehabilitation Network, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 10;15(8):e0221668. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221668. eCollection 2020.
Animal models of brain recovery identify the first days after lesioning as a time of great flux in sensorimotor function and physiology. After rodent motor system lesioning, daily skill training in the less affected forelimb reduces skill acquisition in the more affected forelimb. We asked whether spontaneous human motor behaviors of the less affected upper extremity (UE) early after stroke resemble the animal training model, with the potential to suppress clinical recovery.
This prospective observational study used a convenience sample of patients (n = 25, mean 4.5 ±1.8) days after stroke with a wide severity range; Controls were hospitalized for non-neurological conditions (n = 12). Outcome measures were Accelerometry, Upper-Extremity Fugl-Meyer (UEFM), Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), Shoulder Abduction/ Finger Extension Test (SAFE), NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS).
Accelerometry indicated total paretic UE movement was reduced compared to controls, primarily due to a 44% reduction of bilateral UE use. Unilateral paretic movement was unchanged. Thus, movement shifted early after stroke; bilateral use was reduced and unilateral use of the non-paretic UE was increased by 77%. Low correlations between movement time and motor performance prompted an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) revealing a 2-component solution; motor performance tests load on one component (motor performance) whereas accelerometry-derived variables load on a second orthogonal component (quantity of movement).
Early after stroke, spontaneous overall UE movement is reduced, and movement shifts to unilateral use of the non-paretic UE. Two mechanisms that could influence motor recovery may already be in place 4.5 ± 1.8 days post stroke: (1) the overuse of the less affected UE, which could set the stage for learned non-use and (2) skill acquisition in the non-paretic limb that could impede recovery. Accurate UE motor assessment requires two independent constructs: motor performance and quantity of movement. These findings provide opportunities and measurement methods for studies to develop new behaviorally-based stroke recovery treatments that begin early after onset.
脑恢复的动物模型表明,损伤后的头几天是感觉运动功能和生理发生巨大变化的时期。啮齿动物运动系统损伤后,对受影响较小的前肢进行每日技能训练会降低受影响较大的前肢的技能习得。我们询问中风后早期受影响较小的上肢(UE)的自发人类运动行为是否类似于动物训练模型,是否有可能抑制临床恢复。
这项前瞻性观察性研究使用了一个便利样本,包括中风后(n = 25,平均4.5±1.8天)严重程度范围广泛的患者;对照组因非神经系统疾病住院(n = 12)。结局指标包括加速度计、上肢Fugl-Meyer评估(UEFM)、动作研究臂测试(ARAT)、肩外展/手指伸展测试(SAFE)、美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)。
加速度计显示,与对照组相比,患侧上肢的总运动减少,主要是由于双侧上肢使用减少了44%。单侧患侧运动未改变。因此,中风后早期运动发生了变化;双侧使用减少,未受影响的患侧上肢的单侧使用增加了77%。运动时间与运动表现之间的低相关性促使进行探索性因素分析(EFA),得出一个双因素解决方案;运动表现测试加载在一个因素上(运动表现),而加速度计得出的变量加载在第二个正交因素上(运动量)。
中风后早期,患侧上肢的自发整体运动减少,运动转向未受影响的患侧上肢的单侧使用。在中风后4.5±1.8天可能已经存在两种可能影响运动恢复的机制:(1)对受影响较小的患侧上肢的过度使用,这可能为习得性废用奠定基础;(2)未受影响肢体的技能习得可能会阻碍恢复。准确的患侧上肢运动评估需要两个独立的指标:运动表现和运动量。这些发现为研究开发基于行为的新的中风恢复治疗方法提供了机会和测量方法,这些治疗方法可在发病后早期开始。