Suppr超能文献

雾化特布他林与静脉注射恩丙茶碱对急性哮喘患者疗效的比较。

Comparison of the effects of nebulized terbutaline with intravenous enprofylline in patients with acute asthma.

作者信息

Ruffin R, Bryant D, Burdon J, Marlin G, Mitchell C, O'Hehir R, Wilson J, Woolcock A, Webb S

出版信息

Chest. 1988 Mar;93(3):510-4. doi: 10.1378/chest.93.3.510.

Abstract

We compared the bronchodilating effects of intravenously administered enprofylline (2 mg/kg) with nebulized terbutaline (10 mg) in patients presenting to hospital with acute asthma in a multicenter double-blind parallel study. One hundred twenty three patients were randomized into the study, and 69 of these fulfilled the inclusion criteria and a retrospective time to study entry criterion; 34 received enprofylline and 35 received terbutaline. There was no significant difference in maximum increase in forced expired volume in 1 second (FEV1) between the enprofylline group (0.24 +/- 0.33 L) and the terbutaline group (0.25 +/- 0.28 L) (p greater than 0.05), nor for the increase in FEV1 over the 1-hour study period. Tremor was reported more in the group receiving terbutaline, and nausea was reported more in the group receiving enprofylline. Two patients experienced hypotension and one patient had a vasovagal episode with enprofylline treatment. Both agents acted as bronchodilators with similar efficacy in patients with acute asthma in this study.

摘要

在一项多中心双盲平行研究中,我们比较了静脉注射恩丙茶碱(2毫克/千克)与雾化吸入特布他林(10毫克)对因急性哮喘入院患者的支气管扩张作用。123名患者被随机纳入研究,其中69名符合纳入标准及回顾性研究入组时间标准;34名接受恩丙茶碱治疗,35名接受特布他林治疗。恩丙茶碱组一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)的最大增加值(0.24±0.33升)与特布他林组(0.25±0.28升)之间无显著差异(p>0.05),在1小时的研究期间FEV1的增加值也无显著差异。报告显示,接受特布他林治疗的组震颤更多见,接受恩丙茶碱治疗的组恶心更多见。恩丙茶碱治疗中有2名患者出现低血压,1名患者发生血管迷走神经发作。在本研究中,两种药物对急性哮喘患者均起到了支气管扩张剂的作用,且疗效相似。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验